Posted on 10/26/2006 4:36:18 PM PDT by cdnerds
Drudge Siren: ALLEN'S REVENGE: EXPOSES RIVAL'S NOVEL WRITINGS; UNDERAGE SEX SCENES
(Excerpt) Read more at drudgereport.com ...
If Allen has to resort to this level of stupidity, control of the Senate is in trouble.
You should bring up this subject with the Clinton war room. I'm sure they'll see the light.
This was just posted opn FR. Webb appearing on Wasgington Post Radio this morning. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1726988/posts
And it keeps people with any level of rational thought from ever wanting to run for public office, leaving us with nothing but mediocre candidates from which to choose.
I'll have to read that. I'm sure the WashPost was really tough on Webb and mentioned that his writings are an indication of his personal values, and that the mudslinging started with some very questionable accusations about Allen.
If Ronald Reagan ran for President today, all we would be hearing about are all the details about his divorce from Jane Wyman.
With logic like that,,,,,
I SEE INTERN MATERIAL HERE!!!
Yeah but Reagan didn't write the script. He was just an actor playing a role written by other people. That's what actors have to do. They play roles created by writers. If actors avoided all roles with any violent scenes they might not work for an entire year. Also, violence is far more common and accepted in our society than the trash Webb wrote about.
I hope so but I wouldn't count on it. Mudslinging and personal destruction are the standard tactics of the DNC since 1992 and while the DNC could make a statment some day that it dislikes these tactics, I expect the mud and personal attacks to continue unabated in 2008. That is today's democRAT party and until the leadership of that party changes, its tactics will not change.
Good grief, why is this so complicated? Exposing Webb's creepiness is not stupidity, it's a national service. What kind of mind dreams this crap up and then decides to publish it? That's the only question.
...control of the Senate is in trouble.
You're damn right it is, and if exposing a pervert knocks him further down in the polls and thus helps keep control of the Senate, that's GREAT.
No, it's not. Reagan's contribution in your example is acting, not creating it. Webb's the one dreaming up sordid tales about strippers slicing bananas with their anatomy.
Remember how pathetic it was when the Left tried to make scandals out of books written by Lynne Cheney and Scooter Libby?Cheney wrote a pulpy novel, "Sisters," about a frontier woman that included graphic sexual passages and lesbian lovers. (A conservative-bashing site reprinted excerpts here.)
Libby wrote a pulpy novel, "The Apprentice," a "story of innocence and temptation" set in turn-of-the-century Japan that included graphic sexual passages--including bestiality and a scene in which the brothers of a dead samurai have sex with his daughter.
Both were works of fiction. You know, stuff that's made up.....
If it were a Republican, it would be around-the-clock coverage on all three primetime networks not to mention the cable outlets. And, they would be demanding multiple resignations.
Unquestionably true.
Made up by whom? This crap to be in the author's head in order to synthesize fiction about it. Conservatives ought to be opposed to the candidacy of a mind like that.
It's not about George Bush, it's about the 300 million rest of us.
I wholeheartedly agree with you. It is high time that we Republicans fight back with all in our arsenal, and then some! While I don't like getting into the gutter with the Dems, there are too many important issues affecting our country today that WE MUST FIGHT to preserve "God, Country & Family"!!! Sorry about the shout, but I really want to emphasize just how important this election is for our country.
And if Lynne or Scooter run for the US Senate, their writings will be relevant material.
To stop HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE in VIRGINIA
I hear rumors that the homosexual agenda research institute (kidding!), as most lefty organizations... resort to lies or disinformation To confuse the voters on the how to vote on the ANTI-GAY-MARRIAGE amendments in the different states. So, I did a little research to be absolutely sure how to vote on it in VIRGINIA only! (other states maybe different). - Public Announcement from EP :)
1 FINAL COPY Proposed Constitutional Amendment To Be Voted on at the November 7, 2006, Election PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT Article I. Bill of Rights. Section 15-A. Marriage. BALLOT QUESTION NUMBER 1
Excerpt -------------------------
EXPLANATION Present Law The Constitution does not define marriage. Under current statutory law in Virginia, persons who marry must have a license and be married by a licensed minister, judge, or other person authorized by law to perform marriages. Present law prohibits marriages between certain individuals. For example, the law prohibits a marriage between a brother and sister, between a couple where one of the parties is married to someone else, and between couples of the same sex. In 1975, the General Assembly enacted a statute (present Code of Virginia § 20- 45.2) that states "A marriage between persons of the same sex is prohibited." In 1997, the General Assembly added a sentence to § 20-45.2 that states that: 2 Any marriage entered into by persons of the same sex in another state or jurisdiction shall be void in all respects in Virginia and any contractual rights created by such marriage shall be void and unenforceable. In 2004, the General Assembly passed a law to prohibit certain civil unions or other arrangements between persons of the same sex. That law (Code of Virginia § 20- 45.3) states that: A civil union, partnership contract or other arrangement between persons of the same sex purporting to bestow the privileges or obligations of marriage is prohibited. Any such civil union, partnership contract or other arrangement entered into by persons of the same sex in another state or jurisdiction shall be void in all respects in Virginia and any contractual rights created thereby shall be void and unenforceable.
Thus, civil unions or other arrangements which purport “to bestow the privileges or obligations of marriage” are prohibited by statute.
Proposed Amendment If approved by the voters, this proposed amendment will become part of the Constitution of Virginia. The proposed amendment adds a definition of marriage as the “union between one man and one woman” to the Constitution's Bill of Rights and prohibits Virginia and its counties, cities, and towns from creating or recognizing any legal status by any name which is comparable to marriage. Marriage in the Commonwealth creates specific legal rights, benefits, and obligations for a man and a woman. There are other legal rights, benefits, and obligations which will continue to be available to unmarried persons, including the naming of an agent to make end-of-life decisions by an Advance Medical Directive (Code of Virginia § 54.1-2981), protections afforded under Domestic Violence laws (Code of Virginia § 18.2- 57.2), ownership of real property as joint tenants with or without a right of survivorship (Code of Virginia § 55-20.1), or disposition of property by will (Code of Virginia § 64.1- 46).
A "yes" vote on the proposed amendment will result in the addition of the proposed Section 15-A to Article I, the Bill of Rights. A "no" vote will mean that there will be no change made in Article I, the Bill of Rights."
And conservatives should oppose them....especially Libby, that's ghastly.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.