Skip to comments.
Roberts nominated 13-5 vote
C-span 3
| 21 Sept 2005
| EDCOIL
Posted on 09/22/2005 9:52:02 AM PDT by edcoil
I am watching a Cspan 3 of the vote. Hard to read the screen but it looks like a 12 to 5 vote for Roberts to be Chief Justice.
TOPICS: Breaking News; Constitution/Conservatism; Politics/Elections; US: Alabama; US: Arizona; US: California; US: Delaware; US: Illinois; US: Iowa; US: Kansas; US: Maine; US: New York; US: Ohio; US: Oklahoma; US: Pennsylvania; US: South Carolina; US: Texas; US: Utah; US: Vermont; US: Wisconsin
KEYWORDS: 109th; anothersouter; biden; brownback; bushsfault; chiefjustice; coburn; cornyn; dewine; durbin; feingold; feinstein; graham; grassley; hatch; historyinthemaking; johnroberts; judiciarycommittee; kennedy; kohl; kyl; leahy; roberts; robertshearings; rollcall; schumer; schummer; scotus; senate; sessions; shoemore; shumer; specter; tedkennedy; ussenate
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-187 next last
To: prairiebreeze
No surprise with those votes
121
posted on
09/22/2005 11:43:36 AM PDT
by
Mo1
To: Peach
The next person, whoever it is, will face hell. All because the RATs have to save face with their kook base. Did you see the scathing comment Ralph Neas wrote about Leahy's vote?? Whewee!
I say Bush should go for broke on the nomination and put up a solid conservative. AND he and Cheney should put the message out to Frist and the R's on the Gang of 14 they'd darned well better stick to their guns.
Like you, I remain unconvinced on the soundness and reliability of the Gang.
122
posted on
09/22/2005 11:44:12 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(Judge Roberts will soon be Chief Justice Roberts. The RATS lose again.)
To: Rokke
At least with Ted Nugent we'd have someone decidedly pro-gun!
123
posted on
09/22/2005 11:54:56 AM PDT
by
Panzerlied
("We shall never surrender!")
To: StarFan
I heard next week. But not sure what day.
124
posted on
09/22/2005 11:55:34 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(FOOTBALL REFEREES: Best seat in the house, and we're paid to be there.)
To: edcoil
Kennedy voted "No," because when they asked whether or not he wanted to "Confirm" he thought they were asking him "Teddy, with all the booze, can your Mr. Happy ever get "firm," so he honestly said, "No"
125
posted on
09/22/2005 11:57:03 AM PDT
by
MindBender26
(Having my own CAR-15 in RVN meant never having to say I was sorry......)
To: ChronicMA
I guess Leahy drew the short straw.
126
posted on
09/22/2005 11:57:18 AM PDT
by
dfwgator
(Flower Mound, TX)
To: Rokke
To: joyspring777
NO votes
Kennedy, E. (MA)
Biden, J. (DE)
Feinstein, D. (CA)
Schumer, C. (NY)
Durbin, R. (IL)There's a real rogues' gallery.
128
posted on
09/22/2005 11:59:38 AM PDT
by
ArrogantBustard
(Western Civilisation is aborting, buggering, and contracepting itself out of existence.)
To: Piranha
Hmmm. I had assumed that Schumer would vote to approve him, based on his closing statement during the hearing. I guess I was wrong. Schumer said on O'Reilly a week ago or so that Roberts was a "mainstream conservative" and that he would probably vote him.
Either he was lying all along, or in the end he just couldn't stop himself from pandering to PFAW and the abortion on demand lobby.
129
posted on
09/22/2005 11:59:45 AM PDT
by
jpl
To: b4its2late
130
posted on
09/22/2005 12:02:56 PM PDT
by
StarFan
To: StarFan
If I find it somewhere, I'll let you know.
131
posted on
09/22/2005 12:04:38 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(FOOTBALL REFEREES: Best seat in the house, and we're paid to be there.)
To: StarFan
132
posted on
09/22/2005 12:07:04 PM PDT
by
b4its2late
(FOOTBALL REFEREES: Best seat in the house, and we're paid to be there.)
To: b4its2late
"the democrats votes were choreographed"...No kidding, that group can't even take a bathroom break without first reading their DNC talking points to make sure they wipe according to the play book! They're disgusting the whole perverted, narcissistic bunch!
To: frankjr
Good observation. It makes you wonder sometimes.
134
posted on
09/22/2005 12:31:16 PM PDT
by
OESY
To: Betaille
You may have a point re: Feingold and Kohl's "Yes" votes for Roberts. Wisconsin has about a 35% Catholic population, and conservative Catholics have made a point to note that some of the Democratic rhetoric against Roberts crossed the line into "know-nothing land".
135
posted on
09/22/2005 12:35:09 PM PDT
by
Gumdrop
To: absolootezer0
To all:
I just cut and pasted it right out of CSPANs website. Errors are theirs, not mine.
To: absolootezer0
His first name is, I believe, Edward and goes by Ted or Teddy. Again, CSPAN info, not mine.
To: Grampa Dave; Zacs Mom
And bravo and thank you to Zacs Mom. Really...uh...CAPTURED the man. (Actually, I wish someone would REALLY capture him and lock him away for a long time.)
To: Rokke
oops. Feinstein, not Boxer. Hard to tell them apart.
Boxer is Uglier.
139
posted on
09/22/2005 1:26:28 PM PDT
by
LtKerst
(Lt Kerst)
To: Rokke; bootyist-monk
Personally, I think the President ought to nominate William Bennett or Ted Nugent. Ted Nugent would never be confirmed after writing that "I'm A Bad American" brief.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120, 121-140, 141-160 ... 181-187 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson