Posted on 09/16/2004 7:41:01 PM PDT by Iam1ru1-2
Publication In Or After September
by Rev. Louis P. Sheldon Chairman, Traditional Values Coalition
Washington, DC Homosexual activists have apparently decided to reveal the next phase of their agenda this fall in theaters all over the United States. Nicole Kidmans film Birth and Kevin Bacons The Woodsman, both present sympathetic views of pedophilia. Three of Hearts: A Postmodern Family, by film producer Susan Kaplan tells the story of two homosexual males and a female who become a family and eventually produce a child. Her film was recently shown at the Toronto Film Festival.
We have long been warning that the next phase of the homosexual movement would include the normalization of adult/child sex and the promotion of polyamorymultiple sex partners as family. Apparently that time has arrived.
The whole debate over the legalization of same-sex marriage takes on new urgency as we are being taught by Susan Kaplan that marriage shouldnt be limited to just two partnersbut three, four, or morein various combinations.
Once same-sex marriage breaks free of its quarantine in Massachusetts and is legalized elsewhereit will be difficult to stop sexual anarchists from demanding the right to marry two or more individuals. It wouldnt surprise me to learn that the legal briefs are already written by homosexual legal firms or the ACLU, just waiting to be filed when the time is right.
And, of course, organizations such as the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF) are now working closely with the Woodhull Freedom Foundation (WFF) to undermine age of consent laws in the 50 states, to promote the legalization of public sex by homosexuals in restrooms and parks, and to legalize prostitution. The NGLTF and WFF bragged about this new campaign in a press release issued on May 28, 2004. This new coalition apparently wants children to be free to engage in sex with whomever they wishregardless of age.
This will be a dream come true for the North American Man-Boy Love Associationand it will become open season for molesters to assault children.
Kevin Bacons film, The Woodsman is produced by homosexual activist filmmaker Lee Daniels who told a reporter for Film Festival Today that he wanted to put a benign face on pedophilia in this film. A benign face on someone who molests children? Why would someone want to provide a sympathetic view of a man who robs children of their innocence and condemns them to years of guilt and shame?
And, why would Nicole Kidman want to portray a woman who thinks a 10-year-old boy is her reincarnated husband? The film shows Kidman and the boy sitting naked in a tub together during a dream sequence.
These three films are part of an overall homosexual-inspired trend that seeks to deconstruct traditional marriage and overturn the taboo against adult/child sex. Hollywood could take a powerful leadership role in condemning the destruction of marriage and helping promote a national outcry against child molesters. Instead, it has become an ally of child molesters and sexual anarchists who are intent on undermining the basic unit of civilization: the traditional family. Our children and the traditional family will suffer the consequences of this Hollywood alliance with sexual criminals and perverts.
The Nicole Kidman film includes, as far as I'm aware, a scene where a mother and son bathe together but I don't know the context of the scene or her on-screen son's age.
Bosses of Kidman's Movie Defend Controversial Scene
29 June 2004 (WENN)
Bosses of Nicole Kidman 's latest movie Birth are defending the decision to include the actress in a bathtub scene with a 10-year-old boy. In the movie, the Oscar-winning actress' dead husband is reincarnated as a child, played by Canadian actor Cameron Bright , and it has elicited much outrage after it was revealed Kidman and her young co-star share a bathtub in one scene. But New Line Cinema's Mark Ordesky insists there's nothing in the movie to cause alarm. He says, "There is no physical contact between Nicole and Cameron. They are not nude in the bathtub. The scene was shot over Nicole's shoulder. (Cameron) is playing a grown man trapped in the body of a 10-year-old. When you see the performances in the context of the plot, it makes perfect sense. It is meant to be a provocative film, but not in a horrible or salacious way." Bright, who played Rebecca Romijn-Stamos ' son in the movie Godsend, notes, "In one movie I did, I had an abusive father, and in another I had a father who was a pedophile. I've had a lot of really dark roles." Lauren Bacall also appears in the movie as Kidman's mother.
Kidman's Kissing Scene with Boy Sparks Outrage
21 June 2004 (WENN)
Hollywood star Nicole Kidman 's latest film has sparked controversy before its even been released - because of a passionate clinch she shares with a ten-year- old boy. The Oscar-winning actress, 36, is seen getting romantic with a ten-year-old boy she believes is the reincarnation of her dead husband in Birth - which has horrified film executives. New Line Cinema bosses are anxious over scenes involving Kidman and the boy stripping off together for a bath - while another scene see the two locking lips. PR companies who are set to promote the $54 million film have allegedly called it a 'publicity nightmare'.
Liberalism is a Mental Ilness that must be crushed !
You wrote:
"I have acquaintances in polyamorous relationships. One is two men, two women but one of the women left. "
Wow. I checked your ID and it says Indiana.
I would've bet you were from California or at
least from Utah </g>
My questions to you, since you have homosexual friends,
are: [WARNING! HAND GRENADES TO FOLLOW]
a) why are so many lesbians "pro-choice" when it
probably won't affect them personally?
b) by the same token, why do so many lesbians
use artificial penises ("d*ldos")? Doesn't it
defeat the whole purpose?
c) Many feminists have derided marriage as a
stultifying social construct designed to subject
women to a lifetime as little more then sex slaves.
Given that so many homosexuals are "liberal" and
presumably have some sympathy towards these views,
why are they so anxious to get married themselves?
These are hard questions to ask, and I am not trying
to get you into trouble; do not jeopardize your
friendships for the sake of _my_ intellectual
curiosity. How did the friend react, for example,
to your suggestion about gay bigamy?
But the only homosexual of my acquaintance
(co-worker) was rather giggly and was unable even to
articulate their own resistance to the current Iraq
invasion, and had thought out their positions on
*anything* very coherently.
We have long been warning that the next phase of the homosexual movement would include the normalization of adult/child sex
And anyone who dared say that was ridiculed and told that was not true at all!
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.1) |
Homosexual Agenda: Categorical Index of Links (Version 1.0) |
Homosexual Keyword Search |
You wrote:
"It's is unfair, unreasonable, slanderous, dangerous, disengenous and innaccurate to link adult-adult homosexuality and pedophilia "
[Sarcasm torpedo ARMED. FIRE!]
I briefly checked your ID. Yep, it was California. If they keep it up, will you scratch their eyes out? </g>
You wrote:
"It's is unfair, unreasonable, slanderous, dangerous, disengenous and innaccurate to link adult-adult homosexuality and pedophilia "
[Sarcasm torpedo ARMED. FIRE!]
I briefly checked your ID. Yep, it was California. If they keep it up, will you scratch their eyes out? </g>
Heh!
"the heart of conservatism is libertarianism."
Reagan supported the Drug War and opposed abortion. He was not a libertarian in the libertine sense you mean.
Advanced mathematics?
?????????????
I don't mean to rain on your parade, but can you point me to any reputable documentation for this? True, their calendar can be today most easily checked by using advanced mathematics, but there in no indication to suggest that given a long enough period of time, all their observations and predictions were the result of anything other than "lower" mathematics. Finding a treatise on imaginary numbers or second derivatives in Mayan or Inca might persuade me otherwise.
But the position that there should be an age of consent is itself a moral position.
There are those who feel such limits are as arbitrary as those condemning homosexuality.
There's so much in your comments... How about this one:
"I have no particular issue with exploring controversial topics in fiction. Such things are critical to vetting ideas, opinions and concepts in a healthy society."
Do you draw any lines at all? If so, where? If not, why? What about a docu-drama about Jeffrey Dahmer, with Dahmer made out to be a sympathetic character? What about the German homosexual cannibal? Do you think it legitimate if a movie were to be made showing him to be a sympathetic character, or the act of homosexuals eating each other (cooked, of course) a desirable and acceptable act?
There is no legitimate reason to debate the issue of pedophilia. There is only one side, and that is that adult/child sex is extremely evil and wrong. There is no other side in the debate.
And BTW, you are wrong concerning there being no connection between homosexuality and child molestation. Homosexuals have been known throughout history to be attracted to young - adolescent and pre-adolescent - boys. You even mentioned that two thirds of victims of pedophiles are girls. So that leaves one third are boys. Guess what - they are molested overwhelmingly by men. Men+boy sex is homosexual. So around 2% of the population is molesting one third of the children who are molested.
That's what the studies report:
Homosexuals, being around 2% (including bisexuals) of the population, account for a third of child molestations. Sources:Child Molestation and Homosexuality
Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children
Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse
Homosexuality and child molestation: the link, the likelihood, the lasting effects.There is absolutely no evidence homosexuality is genetic.
Try this one on for size. This story just broke in the Chicago area:
Evanston Teacher (and Teachers' Union President) Charged For Soliciting A Child For Sex
Evanston Teacher's Union President Arrested - Carroll Charged With Trying To Solicit Child
Robert Carroll, the perp, and [Carroll's "boyfriend"] Russell Elenz have two adopted sons. I fear for those boys.
ugh
Courtesy ping.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.