There's so much in your comments... How about this one:
"I have no particular issue with exploring controversial topics in fiction. Such things are critical to vetting ideas, opinions and concepts in a healthy society."
Do you draw any lines at all? If so, where? If not, why? What about a docu-drama about Jeffrey Dahmer, with Dahmer made out to be a sympathetic character? What about the German homosexual cannibal? Do you think it legitimate if a movie were to be made showing him to be a sympathetic character, or the act of homosexuals eating each other (cooked, of course) a desirable and acceptable act?
There is no legitimate reason to debate the issue of pedophilia. There is only one side, and that is that adult/child sex is extremely evil and wrong. There is no other side in the debate.
And BTW, you are wrong concerning there being no connection between homosexuality and child molestation. Homosexuals have been known throughout history to be attracted to young - adolescent and pre-adolescent - boys. You even mentioned that two thirds of victims of pedophiles are girls. So that leaves one third are boys. Guess what - they are molested overwhelmingly by men. Men+boy sex is homosexual. So around 2% of the population is molesting one third of the children who are molested.
That's what the studies report:
Homosexuals, being around 2% (including bisexuals) of the population, account for a third of child molestations. Sources:Child Molestation and Homosexuality
Homosexual Rape and Murder of Children
Homosexuality and Child Sexual Abuse
Homosexuality and child molestation: the link, the likelihood, the lasting effects.There is absolutely no evidence homosexuality is genetic.