Posted on 12/07/2003 8:17:54 PM PST by Mia T
missus clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic
One has to surmise from hillary clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize. (Incidentally, someone ought to clue in her dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit." Nothing more... nothing less....)
It is common knowledge that missus clinton limits the frequency, intensity and content of her cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Tim Russert's (Meet the Press, NBC) stomach-turning HILLARY 2004! boosterism and nonexistent follow-ups ("And why do you suppose there aren't enough troops to fight a war, missus CLINTON?") made it clear that she had the latter two -- intensity and content -- covered today. It was frequency that was did her in.
Tokyo Rose also aided and abetted our enemies by using psychological warfare designed to lower the morale of our troops; and she was convicted of treason. One could easily argue that clinton's betrayal, because it is ultimately self-serving, is an even greater iniquity. And then, of course, there are the clintons' other treasonous acts....
Russert, therefore, was not only on the wrong page. He was in the wrong book.
issus clinton failed to notice: 'living history' begets a certain symmetry. How fitting it is that the clintons were forced to reveal their inept and treasonous hand on this day, exactly 62 years after the attack on Pearl Harbor.
The questions isn't,
"Who in his right mind would ever want the clintons back in the Oval Office?"
The question is,--
"Who in his right mind would want the seditious, America-undermining clintons unconfined?"
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
http://hillarytalks.blogspot.com
http://virtualclintonlibrary.blogspot.com
http://demmemogate.blogspot.com
http://www.hillarytalks.us
http://www.hillarytalks.org
fiendsofhillary.blogspot.com
fiendsofhillary.us
fiendsofhillary.org
fraudsofhillary.com
copyright Mia T 2003
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: ON VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: ON CHINA
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: On White House Coverups
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: On Military Tactics (clintonTURKEYS, clintonTREASON)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: ON PREDATORS
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: On White House Intimidation
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: ON TRAVEL OFFICE
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: On Ethnic Slurs
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: L'Etat, c'est moi! (Iowa parsed)
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
hillary talks: On Terror
(viewing movie requires Flash Player 6, available HERE)
Lib Author Regrets Voting (TWICE!) for clinton
"Sickened" by clinton's Failure to Protect America from Terrorism
MUST-READ BOOK FOR DEMOCRATS:
How clintons' Failures Unleashed Global Terror
The Man Who Warned America
(Why a Rapist is Not a Fit President)
UDAY: "The end is near this time I think the Americans are serious, Bush is not like Clinton."
eyes wide shut (she knew she raped, too)
A '68 Mustang is not exculpatory
missus clinton's REAL virtual office update
Q ERTY8BUMP
by Mia T, 6.11.03
The endless plume of leeward (leftward, miasmic, co-rapist) clinton puff seems to defy not only the laws of logic and decency, but the first law of thermodynamics -- conservation of energy that is, if one fails to considers entropy. The second law of thermodynamics states that the quality of energy in a closed system is degraded irreversibly. Physical, chemical, and electrical energy transform into thermal energy --heat. Reversing the process, e.g., heat into physical energy, cannot fully occur within the system without an inevitable loss of energy in the form of irretrievable heat. Energy is not destroyed; it is merely unavailable for producing work. (The irreversible increase of this nondisposable energy in the universe is measured by the abstract dimension called entropy.) clinton corruption is all about the irreversible degradation of the energy in our closed system. A leftist band of heat-producing useful idiots are currently assisting in the clintons' $8-million--make that $20 million--revisionist assault. ![]() And if ever there was a heat-producing USEFUL IDIOT, it is Harvard's Elizabeth Sherman, who contends, apparently, that the clintons' rape of Broaddrick is somehow mitigated over time.. Contrast Sherman with clinton Administration Veteran/ Berkeley Professor, J. Bradford DeLong, who observed missus clinton up close:
There is a lot of talk these days, most notably by voluble nervous-Nellie Democratic operatives like Susan Estrich, about the clintons sucking up the oxygen, but no one is paying attention to the irreversible transformation of light into heat by the clintons. Once we understand that the latter process is irreversible, we will begin to do what we must.
|
The wife of the rapist is on a down hill run, hopefully there is no tree to stop her as she hurtles at blurring speed towards the iced over lake which will crack with a resounding thwaangggg!!! as she hits it; she will zip right through the crack into the cold, black icy water, plunging to great depths and the crack will slowly close up over her making a new Lock Ness monster, which should she ever surface and shall be called Horribilis Femineus Clintoneus
One has to surmise from hillary clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize. (Incidentally, someone ought to clue in her dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit." Nothing more... nothing less....) It is common knowledge that missus clinton limits the frequency, intensity and content of her cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Tim Russert's (Meet the Press, NBC) stomach-turning HILLARY 2004! boosterism and nonexistent follow-ups ("And why do you suppose there aren't enough troops to fight a war, missus CLINTON?") made it clear that she had the latter two -- intensity and content -- covered today. It was frequency that did her in. Tokyo Rose also aided and abetted our enemies by using psychological warfare designed to lower the morale of our troops; and she was convicted of treason. One could easily argue that clinton's betrayal, because it is ultimately self-serving, is an even greater iniquity. And then, of course, there are the clintons' other treasonous acts.... ![]()
Russert, therefore, was not only on the wrong page. He was in the wrong book.
|
Mia T, 12.14.03 z = distance between flag lapel pin and chin d = distance between midpoint of chin and jowl y = distance between the midpoint of chin and top button x = distance between top button and flag lapel pin
One has to surmise from hillary clinton's Sunday-Circuit, pink-suited panic that clinton in-house polling has the missus out-polling Jane Fonda for the Tokyo-Rose prize. (Incidentally, someone ought to clue in clinton's dresser: exculpation-by-pink-suit can work only once; notwithstanding, a treasonous middle-aged matron in a pink suit reads: "dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit"... or to the sharper subset, "fatuous dowdy treasonous middle-aged matron in pink suit attempts ingénue exculpation ploy." What could they be thinking? Surely, clinton "infrastructure" knows that such a scheme requires freshness of face, not mouth....) It is common knowledge that missus clinton limits the frequency, intensity and content of her cozy clintonoid interviews of the Colmes kind. Tim Russert's (Meet the Press, NBC) stomach-turning HILLARY 2004! boosterism and nonexistent follow-ups ("And why do you suppose there aren't enough troops to fight a war, missus CLINTON?") made it clear that she had the latter two -- intensity and content -- covered today. It was frequency that did her in. Tokyo Rose also aided and abetted our enemies by using psychological warfare designed to lower the morale of our troops; and she was convicted of treason. One could easily argue that clinton's betrayal, because it is ultimately self-serving, is an even greater iniquity. And then, of course, there are the clintons' other self-serving treasonous acts.... Russert, therefore, was not only on the wrong page. He was in the wrong book. The question isn't, The question is,-- hillary talks: ON MILITARY TACTICS |
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.