Skip to comments.
Fossils Bridge Gap in African Mammal Evolution
Reuters to My Yahoo! ^
| Wed Dec 3, 2003
| Patricia Reaney
Posted on 12/03/2003 4:53:26 PM PST by Pharmboy
LONDON (Reuters) - Fossils discovered in Ethiopia's highlands are a missing piece in the puzzle of how African mammals evolved, a team of international scientists said on Wednesday.
Little is known about what happened to mammals between 24 million to 32 million years ago, when Africa and Arabia were still joined together in a single continent.
But the remains of ancestors of modern-day elephants and other animals, unearthed by the team of U.S. and Ethiopian scientists 27 million years on, provide some answers.
"We show that some of these very primitive forms continue to live through the missing years, and then during that period as well, some new forms evolved -- these would be the ancestors of modern elephants," said Dr John Kappelman, who headed the team.
The find included several types of proboscideans, distant relatives of elephants, and fossils from the arsinoithere, a rhinoceros-like creature that had two huge bony horns on its snout and was about 7 feet high at the shoulder.
"It continues to amaze me that we don't have more from this interval of time. We are talking about an enormous continent," said Kappelman, who is based at the University of Texas at Austin.
Scientists had thought arsinoithere had disappeared much earlier but the discovery showed it managed to survive through the missing years. The fossils from the new species found in Ethiopia are the largest, and at 27 million years old, the youngest discovered so far.
"If this animal was still alive today it would be the central attraction at the zoo," Tab Rasmussen, a paleontologist at Washington University in St Louis, Missouri who worked on the project, said in a statement.
Many of the major fossil finds in Ethiopia are from the Rift Valley. But Kappelman and colleagues in the United States and at Ethiopia's National Science Foundation (news - web sites) and Addis Ababa University concentrated on a different area in the northwestern part of the country.
Using high-resolution satellite images to scour a remote area where others had not looked before, his team found the remains in sedimentary rocks about 6,600 feet above sea level.
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Miscellaneous; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: africa; archaeology; crevolist; evolution; ggg; godsgravesglyphs; history; links; mammals; multiregionalism; neandertal
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,101-1,105 next last
To: Phaedrus
I would be far more disturbed in an era without QM as the underlying paradigm of physics. I do not follow th math of QM very well, but the strangeness of it meshes nicely with my worldview. I do not understand or expect ever to understand the deep down basis of existence, but I do think science is the most effective tool for whittling away at the problem.
961
posted on
12/11/2003 1:26:26 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
I always thought the lottery was a tax on ignorant and undereducated people...And that is different from OTHER taxes how????
962
posted on
12/11/2003 1:26:42 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: Elsie
Every time I post something to this effect, 'Change a bit at a time in a computer program and just SEE if it gets better', in response to the "E" mantra of random mutations changing a living creature advantageously, it seems to be absorbed into a black hole: no responses ensue....Well, this ain't no black hole. Genetic algorithms do exactly what you say.
On the subject of computer viruses, hybris changed its name randomly to help avoid detection and restart itself if erased.
To: Elsie
And that is different from OTHER taxes how????Most taxes are on achievement and are paid by the most productive members of society.
964
posted on
12/11/2003 1:29:58 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
I do not understand or expect ever to understand the deep down basis of existence, but I do think science is the most effective tool for whittling away at the problem.
Ecclesiastes 6:10
Whatever exists has already been named, and what man is has been known; no man can contend with one who is stronger than he.
Hebrews 2:10
In bringing many sons to glory, it was fitting that God, for whom and through whom everything exists, should make the author of their salvation perfect through suffering.
Hebrews 11:6
And without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him.
2 Peter 3:5
But they deliberately forget that long ago by God's word the heavens existed and the earth was formed out of water and by water.
965
posted on
12/11/2003 1:30:38 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: Right Wing Professor
An algorithm is NOT a program......
(is it the ex VEEP dancing?)
966
posted on
12/11/2003 1:33:07 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: js1138; Alamo-Girl; Phaedrus; marron; Right Wing Professor; tortoise
All living creatures, even plants neurons, have tropisms, reflexes, adaptive learning mechanisms that make life essential bets about the future. That future might be milliseconds away or it might be months. The awareness is built in, even when it is not conscious. By saying the above, you merely confirm my observation, js1138. Which is that all living creatures display adaptive learning mechanisms that make life-essential "bets about the future" -- regardless of whether the organism is self-aware ("fully conscious") or not. Even amoebae seem to have the capability "to learn." Does a computer virus?
967
posted on
12/11/2003 1:34:34 PM PST
by
betty boop
(God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world. -- Paul Dirac)
To: js1138
Most taxes are on achievement and are paid by the most productive members of society.Because the LEAST productive members of society are allowed to VOTE! To vote to STEAL the time and effort of the others.
968
posted on
12/11/2003 1:36:21 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: js1138
I would be far more disturbed in an era without QM as the underlying paradigm of physics. I do not follow th math of QM very well, but the strangeness of it meshes nicely with my worldview. I do not understand or expect ever to understand the deep down basis of existence, but I do think science is the most effective tool for whittling away at the problem. I find myself "reacting" in a multitude of ways to this with an inclination to agree overall. I think the thrust of Western Science's initial blooming as an exploration of certain aspects of the nature of God was correct and should be regained. I think the Materialist blinders must be removed. But science is and will remain a powerful tool in our attempts to understand reality. There are more things in heaven and on earth than are dreamed of in our philosophies. Or our sciences. Perhaps we can also regain some of the wonder.
To: Right Wing Professor
A computer virus most definitely, in reproducing itself, decreases its entropy How?
970
posted on
12/11/2003 1:40:09 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: betty boop
Does a computer virus? If you are comparing them to biological viruses, I'd say yes, there are computer viruses that display that level of learning. There are polymorphic viruses that replicate via email, grabbing bits of text from the host to include in the next round. This is why they can avoid any simple filter based on the text of the message subject. They can also modify the text of their own code to avoid detection by anti-virus scanners. This is one of the reasons anti-virus programs need such frequent updates.
I occasionally monitor the log file for the company firewall. I see continual hits by the slammer virus that was effectively countered last summer. Yet it continues to propagate.
971
posted on
12/11/2003 1:42:36 PM PST
by
js1138
To: Phaedrus
I think the thrust of Western Science's initial blooming as an exploration of certain aspects of the nature of God was correct and should be regained. I can't disagree with that, although I would certainly differ from your view at some place in the details. I am not overly concerned with silly remarks made by individual scientists, and I think parents should be ready and able to counter anything said at school that disagrees with their worldview. (In the long run, however, children will merge what their parents say with what they hear from others. This places a premium on parents developing defensible positions on things they consider important.)
972
posted on
12/11/2003 1:50:13 PM PST
by
js1138
To: Right Wing Professor; Alamo-Girl; Phaedrus; js1138; marron
Some of the most fundamental principles of quantum mechanics - e.g. the Heisenberg principle, the Schrödinger equation - explicitly include first derivatives with respect to time. Quantum events are perfectly indifferent to time, and they do not depend on the future in the sense I describe: They depend on the observer. It is the observer -- Heisenberg, Schroedinger, the experimental scientist -- who "interjects" any kind of time sense into such events. And generally, this is limited to noting the time duration of the observed quantum event.
But the concept of future I am trying to describe to you involves a teleological consideration -- a purpose, a goal. Do you suppose that quantum particles exchanging energy among themselves or a vacuum field have such any goal or purpose in view?
973
posted on
12/11/2003 1:53:02 PM PST
by
betty boop
(God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world. -- Paul Dirac)
To: js1138; Alamo-Girl; Phaedrus; marron; Right Wing Professor
If you are comparing them to biological viruses, I'd say yes, there are computer viruses that display that level of learning. To whatever extent computer viruses are able to "learn," it is in the limit of the algorithm that specifies them. That is, they have this ability put into them from "outside." Therefore, they are not alive.
974
posted on
12/11/2003 1:55:27 PM PST
by
betty boop
(God used beautiful mathematics in creating the world. -- Paul Dirac)
To: Elsie
Because the LEAST productive members of society are allowed to VOTE! To vote to STEAL the time and effort of the others. I suppose we could have a constitutional ammendment denying citizenship to the least of these...
975
posted on
12/11/2003 1:58:19 PM PST
by
js1138
To: js1138
The constitution is fine, except for the fact that is not followed.
Any MORE amendments will change nothing: The till is fully open to anyone with the brass to raid it.
976
posted on
12/11/2003 2:03:53 PM PST
by
Elsie
(Don't believe every prophecy you hear: especially *** ones........)
To: betty boop
In the sense you describe, classical mechanics doesn't depend on the future, either. Neither do chemical or biological or geological or astronomical systems.
977
posted on
12/11/2003 2:06:15 PM PST
by
Doctor Stochastic
(Vegetabilisch = chaotisch is der Charakter der Modernen. - Friedrich Schlegel)
To: betty boop
Quantum events are perfectly indifferent to time, and they do not depend on the future in the sense I describe: They depend on the observer. It is the observer -- Heisenberg, Schroedinger, the experimental scientist -- who "interjects" any kind of time sense into such events. And generally, this is limited to noting the time duration of the observed quantum event. Quantum mechanics determines the behavior of all matter, whether or not anyone observes it. Any chemical reaction is a time-dependent process that is governed by quantum mechanics.
Do you suppose that quantum particles exchanging energy among themselves or a vacuum field have such any goal or purpose in view
No. But nor do I think that a dividing amoeba has one either.
To: betty boop
To whatever extent computer viruses are able to "learn," it is in the limit of the algorithm that specifies them. That is, they have this ability put into them from "outside." Therefore, they are not alive. We can assemble some viruses from their constituent molecules. Are they any more or less alive from the same virus in the wild?
To: Elsie
Because they change a random sequence of bits on a hard disk to a specific sequence.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 941-960, 961-980, 981-1,000 ... 1,101-1,105 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson