Click here: to donate by Credit Card
Or here: to donate by PayPal
Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Thank you very much and God bless you.
Posted on 05/18/2026 9:11:26 PM PDT by Red Badger
For more than two centuries, scientists have tried to determine one of the most important numbers in physics: the universal gravitational constant, known as "big G." It defines the strength of gravity throughout the universe, influencing everything from falling objects on Earth to the motion of galaxies. Yet despite its importance, researchers still cannot agree on its exact value.
That uncertainty weighed heavily on Stephan Schlamminger, a physicist at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), as he prepared to open a sealed envelope containing a crucial secret number. For nearly 10 years, Schlamminger had devoted much of his career to measuring big G with extraordinary precision. The hidden number inside the envelope would finally allow him to decode his team's results.
Why Measuring Gravity Is So Difficult
Gravity may shape the cosmos, but it is surprisingly weak compared to the other fundamental forces of nature. Electromagnetism, for example, is far stronger. Even a tiny magnet can lift a paper clip against the pull of Earth's entire gravitational field.
That weakness becomes an enormous challenge in the lab. Scientists must measure the gravitational attraction between relatively small objects, and those forces are incredibly faint. The masses used in experiments are roughly 500 billion trillion times smaller than Earth, making the gravitational pull between them extremely difficult to detect accurately.
Researchers have spent more than 225 years trying to improve measurements of big G since Isaac Newton first described gravity mathematically. Despite increasingly advanced equipment, modern experiments still produce slightly different answers. The differences are tiny, about one part in 10,000, but they are larger than expected experimental uncertainties.
That has raised an uncomfortable question. Are scientists overlooking subtle flaws in their experiments, or is there something incomplete about our understanding of gravity itself?
(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...
|
|
Click here: to donate by Credit Card Or here: to donate by PayPal Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794 Thank you very much and God bless you. |
Why buy milk, when...
Well, you know
The number is 42 isnt it ?
And thanks for all the fish.
I think you ought to know I’m feeling very depressed.
McMahon: And what is the answer, O Great Carnac?
Carson: 6.6743×10−11 m3⋅kg−1⋅s−2
Regards,
And God just says, "Come on guys, think!"
Gravity, not just a cool idea. It’s the law.
It’s a very attractive subject.
‘Uniboob’ is a real medical condition — who’s likely to get it
https://nypost.com/2026/05/16/health/uniboob-is-a-real-medical-condition-whos-likely-to-get-it/
That’s a significant warp in space-time.
Until gravity is actually understood no measurement of it is possible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.