Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

... in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.
https://x.com/AGPamBondi/status/1947622027587723365 ^ | July 22, 2025 | AG Pam Bondi

Posted on 07/22/2025 7:37:32 AM PDT by Racketeer

Statement from @DAGToddBlanche :

This Department of Justice does not shy away from uncomfortable truths, nor from the responsibility to pursue justice wherever the facts may lead. The joint statement by the DOJ and FBI of July 6 remains as accurate today as it was when it was written. Namely, that in the recent thorough review of the files maintained by the FBI in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.

President Trump has told us to release all credible evidence. If Ghislane Maxwell has information about anyone who has committed crimes against victims, the FBI and the DOJ will hear what she has to say.

Therefore, at the direction of Attorney General Bondi, I have communicated with counsel for Ms. Maxwell to determine whether she would be willing to speak with prosecutors from the Department. I anticipate meeting with Ms. Maxwell in the coming days. Until now, no administration on behalf of the Department had inquired about her willingness to meet with the government. That changes now.


TOPICS: Agriculture; Books/Literature; Education; Food
KEYWORDS: aclownposting; bondibashing; bondipatelcoverup; bondiwhiners; bondiwhining; clinton; coverupcomplete; crappytdstroll; criminal; epstein; epsteindelusion; epsteindistraction; garbagepost; gates; heyitsawhiner; heyitsbondi; losers; lyingscum; noonecares; nothing2seehere; pambondi; pedophilia; problemtrollneedszot; promisesnotkept; rrrrrrrightpam; slandermerchants; wasteoftime

Click here: to donate by Credit Card

Or here: to donate by PayPal

Or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794

Thank you very much and God bless you.


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last
I wonder what changed? Last weeks excuse now gives Maxwell a ticket out. In exchange for her testimony, she will be released.

This is unconscionable and more proof of the sickness within our leadership.

1 posted on 07/22/2025 7:37:32 AM PDT by Racketeer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Racketeer
no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.

I didn't see it in 2022 when Maxwell was convicted, but the writing was right there on the wall --

Maxwell procured, Epstein abused. She's in jail. He's dead. We're done. No one else was ever involved in anything. The verdict against Maxwell spelled this all out. It was a two person operation. Full stop.

The government had this one tied up with a bow three years ago. We just didn't get the memo.

2 posted on 07/22/2025 7:43:22 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (The list of things I no longer care about is long. And it's getting longer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer

I’d take Ghislane getting out in exchange for naming ALL of the pedos.


3 posted on 07/22/2025 7:43:55 AM PDT by uranium penguin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer
And now a word from George Carlin:


4 posted on 07/22/2025 7:44:56 AM PDT by Leaning Right (It's morning in America. Again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer

The Deep State has had ~6 years to sanitize what was found, including 4 while Dopey was “President”. And the year and a half during Trump45, the DOJ/FBI could not be said to be fully under Trump’s control.

If you have evidence that can be used to prosecute Epstein Island visitors, get it out there, tell us all about it.


5 posted on 07/22/2025 7:47:01 AM PDT by FreedomPoster (Islam delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

We also didn’t get the totality of evidence that existed back then. Anyone who thinks the FBI/DOJ wouldn’t have destroyed anything hasn’t been paying attention.


6 posted on 07/22/2025 7:48:57 AM PDT by bigbob (Yes. We ARE going back)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: uranium penguin

Naming and proving is two different things. We don’t want 100 libel lawsuits. Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.


7 posted on 07/22/2025 7:52:40 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer
In exchange for her testimony, she will be released.

You made that up.

8 posted on 07/22/2025 7:58:02 AM PDT by M. Thatcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer

Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
·
1h
Today’s statement by Pam Bondi seems like a massive cope. Why wasn’t this “interview” with Ghislaine Maxwell done on day 1?

I guess what I want to know is whether the DOJ is basically saying they have never met with Ghislaine Maxwell to ask her or interview her about whether she has information about sex crimes committed against minors…

Shouldn’t they have already done this?

Maybe there is a mix up in communication. But I just can’t help but wonder whether or not this has already happened. And if not, why?
Quote
Laura Loomer
@LauraLoomer
·
JUST IN: Pam Bondi says the DOJ & FBI are open to meeting with Jeffrey Epstein associate Ghislaine Maxwell to discuss whether or not she has information about people who have committed sex crimes against minors.


9 posted on 07/22/2025 8:01:00 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer

I will bet a months pay that he doesn’t ask her why she thinks her father’s funeral was attended by 6 current and former heads of Israeli intelligence.


10 posted on 07/22/2025 8:03:18 AM PDT by nitzy (I don’t trust good looking country singers or fat doctors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

I have been paying attention and they have not destroyed everything. They can’t.

Yes, someone ..ahem..CIA...or uh..a “technical glitch” destroyed all of Alex Acosta’s incoming emails as it regards the sweetheart deal with Epstein that happened under the Bush Admin. Even though they claim it happened to more than one person it would have been easy for CIA to do it to more than one so as not to look suspicious.

There are still plenty of files that could be accessed including the transcript of the interview with OPR.

The Trump Admin itself knows whether or not Acosta said Epstein belonged to intelligence. Read that sentence again.

A CIA name trace should have been done. Where is it? If they didn’t do it, then do it.

FINCEN. Treasury has an Epstein file.

there are avenues to pursue.


11 posted on 07/22/2025 8:07:40 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer

“in the Epstein case, no evidence was uncovered that could predicate an investigation against uncharged third parties.,”

That could be a true statement, even if a ton of evidence of crimes by third parties exist, IF the Statutes of Limitation have run out.

Whether SoLs come into play depends on the specific crimes, the states where they occurred, when they occurred.


12 posted on 07/22/2025 8:11:16 AM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nitzy

or why he was buried at Mount Olives.

I dont know anything about the place other than a blurb I saw where it allows you to be first in line for the resurrection.

He was a british citizen. Not sure any ole british citizen can be buried there.

the writer for Tomorrow Never dies said Maxwell was the inspiration for the Bond Villain


13 posted on 07/22/2025 8:13:01 AM PDT by RummyChick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau
Naming and proving is two different things. We don’t want 100 libel lawsuits. Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.

Bingo. At a bare minimum, you'd need the victim willing to provide concrete, sworn testimony regarding sexual acts they committed with the specific accused. My guess is that is the biggest roadblock they have regarding prosecuting any additional parties.

Most of them, to the extent they could identify the guy, likely wants nothing further to do with this, doesn't want the publicity, and won't cooperate.

14 posted on 07/22/2025 8:15:32 AM PDT by Bruce Campbells Chin ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: nitzy
I will bet a months pay that he doesn’t ask her why she thinks her father’s funeral was attended by 6 current and former heads of Israeli intelligence.

How many CIA heads attended?
15 posted on 07/22/2025 8:18:57 AM PDT by Jan_Sobieski (Sanctification)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.


That’s true. They could interview the victims, whose testimony, of course, would have to be adjudicated in a court of law. It will take years and years to get through all that, but criminals need to be held accountable, and this dirty, nasty underbelly needs to be exposed. What a mess.


16 posted on 07/22/2025 8:20:20 AM PDT by Flaming Conservative ((Pray without ceasing))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Racketeer
tail-chase
17 posted on 07/22/2025 8:21:59 AM PDT by The Louiswu (USA FIRST...USA FOREVER)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Louiswu

Ha! Posting known lefty memes, we see.

Not a good look, Wu.


18 posted on 07/22/2025 8:22:53 AM PDT by Jane Long (Jesus is Lord!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: uranium penguin

I would only if indictments were obtained - a conviction on anyone is a bridge too far for anyone to expect. So disappointing, disgusting and destructive.


19 posted on 07/22/2025 8:22:55 AM PDT by linedrive ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Jan_Sobieski

None that I know of....enlighten me if I am wrong. I am always eager to learn new truths.


20 posted on 07/22/2025 8:23:05 AM PDT by nitzy (I don’t trust good looking country singers or fat doctors.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-72 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson