To: Racketeer
I’d take Ghislane getting out in exchange for naming ALL of the pedos.
To: uranium penguin
Naming and proving is two different things. We don’t want 100 libel lawsuits. Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.
To: uranium penguin
I would only if indictments were obtained - a conviction on anyone is a bridge too far for anyone to expect. So disappointing, disgusting and destructive.
19 posted on
07/22/2025 8:22:55 AM PDT by
linedrive
( )
To: uranium penguin
She could have named them at her trial and pre-trial.
39 posted on
07/22/2025 9:13:22 AM PDT by
Fury
To: uranium penguin
I’d take Ghislane getting out in exchange for naming ALL of the pedos.
She has an argument before SCOTUS that she never should have been prosecuted because of Epstein's plea deal. They could have invoked that as proof she didn't have a Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination. They preferred to prosecute her to keep her silent. Let her off, and she has to talk. The Biden administration didn't want her talking because she might have impugned other Rats, possibly including Biden himself.
56 posted on
07/22/2025 12:16:58 PM PDT by
Dr. Franklin
("A republic, if you can keep it." )
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson