[Sacajaweau]

Naming and proving is two different things. We don’t want 100 libel lawsuits. Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.

[Bruce Campbells Chin]

Naming and proving is two different things. We don’t want 100 libel lawsuits. Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.

Bingo. At a bare minimum, you'd need the victim willing to provide concrete, sworn testimony regarding sexual acts they committed with the specific accused. My guess is that is the biggest roadblock they have regarding prosecuting any additional parties.

Most of them, to the extent they could identify the guy, likely wants nothing further to do with this, doesn't want the publicity, and won't cooperate.

[Flaming Conservative]

Just because someone showed up at Epstein’s places doesn’t mean you had sex with a minor.

---

That’s true. They could interview the victims, whose testimony, of course, would have to be adjudicated in a court of law. It will take years and years to get through all that, but criminals need to be held accountable, and this dirty, nasty underbelly needs to be exposed. What a mess.