Posted on 02/05/2025 4:54:44 AM PST by Red Badger
For decades, fusion researchers struggled with neutron isotropy, a key indicator of scalable plasma stability. Zap Energy’s latest results show its FuZE device avoids the pitfalls of past Z pinch failures, generating isotropic neutrons that confirm thermal fusion is occurring.
A Major Milestone for Zap’s Fusion Technology
In physics, “isotropy” refers to a system where properties remain the same in all directions. In fusion research, neutron energy isotropy is a key measurement that assesses how evenly neutrons are emitted from a device. This uniformity is crucial — when fusion plasmas are isotropic, they indicate a stable, thermal plasma that can be scaled up for greater energy production. In contrast, anisotropic plasmas, which emit neutrons unevenly, suggest instability and may not support sustainable fusion.
A recent Zap Energy study, published in Nuclear Fusion, presents the most compelling evidence yet that its sheared-flow-stabilized Z-pinch method produces stable, thermal fusion. The research, conducted on the FuZE device, marks a significant milestone in proving that Zap’s approach can be scaled to higher energy outputs, strengthening confidence in the performance potential of the next-generation FuZE-Q device.
“Essentially, this measurement indicates that the plasma is in a thermodynamic equilibrium,” explains Uri Shumlak, Zap’s Chief Scientist and Co-Founder. “That means we can double the size of the plasma and expect the same sort of equilibrium to exist.”
Inside a Zap core, hydrogen nuclei are fused into helium, a process that kicks out a neutron at high energies. These neutrons carry 80% of the energy that comes from the fusion reaction, so, in general, the more neutrons, the better.
However, not all kinds of fusion reactions are created equal. Thermal fusion is Zap’s goal — when nuclei are fused together by the extreme heat and pressure inside its plasmas. Thermal fusion produces energetic neutrons that scale exponentially (at around 10 to the eleventh power) as the amount of current conducting through the plasma is dialed up to reach the levels necessary for fusion to yield net energy.
Less desirable is what’s known as beam-target fusion, which happens when a hydrogen nucleus is accelerated to high velocity and strikes a stationary nucleus. Unlike in thermal fusion, beam-target fusion indicates the plasma is out of equilibrium, and therefore doesn’t scale as strongly, making a working energy source much more difficult.
Thermal fusion produces neutrons with isotropic velocities, or with the same energy in all directions, while beam-target fusion produces them anisotropically, or such that neutrons in certain directions have higher energies. So, comparing measurements of the neutron energy at different locations is a simple way to see how much of the fusion in the FuZE device is non-thermal.
“If we saw neutrons primarily from a beam-target source, it would mean that our machine wouldn’t be scalable. We couldn’t get to net energy production,” says Rachel Ryan, a senior scientist at Zap and lead author of the new research.
To test the neutron isotropy in FuZE, Zap scientists and engineers ran a series of tests using neutron detectors placed around the device. Measuring 433 plasma shots generated with the same machine settings, the neutrons were found to be almost totally isotropic.
Neutron Detector Fusion Test Prep
Zap researcher Rachel Ryan prepares a neutron detector prior to fusion tests. Credit: Zap Energy
A Meaningful Measurement, in More Ways Than One
Besides being a key benchmark for physics progress, neutron isotropy holds extra historical significance for Zap’s fusion approach.
The Z pinch is one of fusion’s oldest approaches and dates back to the 1950s. When scientists working on the Zero Energy Thermonuclear Assembly (ZETA) device in the United Kingdom began using magnetic fields to “pinch” a plasma strongly enough to create fusion, they thought they had succeeded. But that success didn’t come in the way they had hoped. Their device turned out to be creating almost entirely beam-target fusion through the creation of instabilities in the magnetic field. That meant they could never generate net-energy-gain fusion. What had been a hopeful moment for the physics community turned out to be a disappointment and a PR disaster.
And while isotropy became a particular black mark for pinch-based approaches, all fusion technologies risk measuring false positives from beam-target neutrons. For example, a device known as a dense plasma focus (DPF) has also been largely dismissed as a practical path to a fusion power plant. Though they are similar in some ways to Zap’s devices and are considered an effective means of generating neutrons, DPF neutrons come primarily from beam-target interactions.
A Step Toward Scalable Fusion Power
In the shadow of those experiments, Zap is extra conscious of the story its neutrons tell. The company first measured thermal fusion in 2018 and these new tests, done with higher sensitivity and at higher energies, are the latest confirmation that sheared flows can postpone the instabilities that doomed previous Z pinch efforts. Scalable thermal Z-pinch fusion, without requiring any external magnets for confinement, remains promising.
The paper represents a major physics consideration, Shumlak says. “This is why we put so much effort into making these precise measurements,” he says.
Preparing for the Future
Since joining Zap in 2023, Ryan has played the lead role in planning and carrying out neutron measurements at Zap, building on work previously done by collaborators and co-authors from Lawrence Livermore National Lab. Next up for the team is running the same set of tests at higher energies on Zap’s FuZE-Q device. Initial results look promising.
“As we continue to scale up, it’s important for us to keep taking this measurement and keep checking whether beam-target fusion is contributing to our yields,” Ryan says.
Interestingly, the paper also notes that the neutrons became less isotropic and lost uniformity near the end of each shot. The researchers suggest this is likely a phase where the pinch becomes unstable before it breaks down and stops generating fusion entirely. Understanding that phase may give a better understanding of how to keep the instabilities from cutting fusion short and further increase the duration and performance of the plasma.
Reference:
“Time-resolved measurement of neutron energy isotropy in a sheared-flow-stabilized Z pinch”
by R.A. Ryan, P.E. Tsai, A.R. Johansen, A.E. Youmans, D.P. Higginson, J.M. Mitrani, C.S. Adams, D.A. Sutherland, B. Levitt and U. Shumlak, 31 January 2025, Nuclear Fusion.
DOI: 10.1088/1741-4326/ada8bf
Only 29 years and 11 months away!.............
It sounds as if they are saying that, at least you get back more of the energy you put into it.
I am, frankly, still bothered by all of this fusion hoopla. They are using heavy isotopes with extra neutrons to even make the creation of helium possible. Unless you can force the production of neutrons, I don’t believe that you have fusion, no matter what you call it.
INVEST NOW!
Is this just about a new way to boil water?
This stuff is literal. We already know from the past that Mr. Fusion *is* a fusion:
The Mr. Fusion was constructed by mounting a Krups Coffina grinder on top of a custom-made base made from the outer shell of a Singer magnetic disc memory core, now obsolete, which was a feature in some computers made in the 1960s.
I did not realized that there are comparison charts for being served cold versus being iced. Obviously grounds for concern, because it could always be worse.
and then hillary is going to jail! Rudy has the receipts. Oh, and fusion
Yeah, it would sound great if I didn’t remember the same headline from 1992.
bkmk
Being made of tremendous amounts of energy, the focus should 100% be on pure matter disassembly. The reverse, fusing atoms into bigger atoms, is, and always has been, an inefficient dead end. Yes, nature does it that way, but nature also takes million of years to form 5 minutes worth of petroleum, coal, and natural gas. Man-made hydrogen fusion devices are for rapidly cooking Demonrats, socialists, and communists in their nests, and little else.
Nature does it easily with something humans don’t possess: MASSIVE AMOUNTS OF GRAVITY....................
Well say you'll be true
well say you'll be true
well say you'll be true
well say that you'll be true FuZE-Q
Yep, just decades away.... again.
Is more money needed?
I agree. And even if it's technically fusion, there's still the impractical matter (pardon the pun) of creating the neutrons to feed it. IMHO, it means we'd have to fight the Weak Nuclear Force (or perhaps it'd be strengthen the WNF to get more bare neutrons out of it) so much that we'd be using up more energy to generate neutrons than we'd save by having fusion.
Take two tachyons and call me in the morning.
Once they get fusion reactors producing electricity then will super capacitors replace batteries and take “refueling” an EV a few minutes instead of hours?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
