Posted on 01/13/2025 6:04:08 AM PST by Red Badger
Rice University physicists have mathematically unveiled the possibility of paraparticles, which defy the traditional binary classification of particles into bosons and fermions.
Their research, which delves into the realms of abstract algebra and condensed matter, hints at groundbreaking applications in quantum computing and information systems, suggesting an exciting, albeit speculative, future for new material properties and particle behavior.
Breaking Conventional Particle Categories
Since the early days of quantum mechanics, scientists have believed that all particles fall into one of two categories — bosons or fermions — defined by their distinct behaviors.
However, recent research by Rice University physicist Kaden Hazzard and former graduate student Zhiyuan Wang challenges this idea. Their study, published in Nature on January 8, provides a mathematical framework suggesting the potential existence of paraparticles — particles that defy the traditional classification and were once thought impossible.
“We determined that new types of particles we never knew of before are possible,” said Hazzard, associate professor of physics and astronomy.
Quantum mechanics has long held that all observable particles are either fermions or bosons. These two types of particles are distinguished by how they behave when near other particles in a given quantum state. Bosons are able to congregate in unlimited numbers, whereas only one fermion can exist in a given state. This behavior of fermions is referred to as the Pauli exclusion principle, which states that no more than two electrons, each with opposite spins, can occupy the same orbital in an atom.
“This behavior is responsible for the whole structure of the periodic table,” said Hazzard. “It’s also why you don’t just go through your chair when you sit down.”
Historical Context and Theoretical Advances
In the 1930s and 1940s, researchers began trying to understand whether other types of particles could exist. A concrete quantum theory of such particles, known as paraparticles, was formulated in 1953 and extensively studied by the high energy physics community. However, by the 1970s, mathematical studies seemed to show that so-called paraparticles were actually just bosons or fermions in disguise. The one exception was the existence of anyons, an exotic type of particle that exists only in two dimensions.
Modern Mathematical Approaches Reveal New Possibilities
However, the mathematical theories of the 1970s and beyond were based on assumptions that are not always true in physical systems. Using a solution to the Yang-Baxter equation, an equation useful for describing the interchange of particles, along with group theory and other mathematical tools, Hazzard and Wang set to work to show that paraparticles could theoretically exist and be fully compatible with the known constraints of physics.
The researchers focused on excitations, which can be thought of as particles, in condensed matter systems such as magnets to provide a concrete example for how paraparticles can emerge in nature. “Particles aren’t just these fundamental things,” said Hazzard. “They’re also important in describing materials.”
“This is cross-disciplinary research that involves several areas of theoretical physics and mathematics,” said Wang, now a postdoctoral researcher at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics in Germany.
Implications for Quantum Mechanics and Beyond
Using advanced mathematics, such as Lie algebra, Hopf algebra, and representation theory, as well as a pictorial method based on something known as tensor network diagrams to better handle equations, Hazzard and Wang were able to perform abstract algebraic calculations to develop models of condensed matter systems where paraparticles emerge. They showed that, unlike fermions or bosons, paraparticles behave in strange ways when they exchange their positions with the internal states of the particles transmuting during the process.
Future Directions and Speculative Applications
While they are groundbreaking on their own, these models are the first step toward a better understanding of many new physical phenomena that could occur in paraparticle systems. Further development of this theory could guide experiments that could detect paraparticles in the excitations of condensed matter systems. “To realize paraparticles in experiments, we need more realistic theoretical proposals,” said Wang.
The discovery of new elementary particles and properties in materials could be used in quantum information and computation such as secretly communicating information by manipulating the internal states of particles.
Contemplating possible applications is in its infancy and still mostly speculation. This study is an early step in the study of parastatistics in condensed matter systems, but where these findings could lead is uncertain. Further exploration of the new types of theories discovered and observation of paraparticles in condensed matter systems and other materials will be subjects for research in the future.
“I don’t know where it will go, but I know it will be exciting to find out,” said Hazzard.
Reference:
“Particle exchange statistics beyond fermions and bosons”
by Zhiyuan Wang, and Kaden R. A. Hazzard, 8 January 2025, Nature.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-08262-7
It is a hypothesis based on mathematics.
It is a theory in which the proposers are attempting to devise an experiment which could be used to test the theory.
That’s called “science.”
I’ve always been fond of large bosons.
...an experiment which could be used to get a government grant...................
It is part of science.
Repeatable experiments to confirm results are the heart of science.
Suggesting speculation. Hypothecating guesses. Hinting at something hopeful.
And readying the next government grant proposal(s).
Bosons produce hadrons.
It’s Turtles All The Way Down!
Watch it, Buddy. Keep your over-excited fermions in your pants.
“We determined that new types of particles we never knew of before are possible,”
Disclaimer: I don’t believe in quantum nonsense.
Comment: That is what passes for scientific research these days?
“Something we never thought of is possible.”
How does the grant money continue to flow based on this “thinking”?
Easy.
The people giving it out are stupid..................
“Bosons produce hadrons.”
Watching them collide. LOL
I dee what you sid there.
Does this contradict the concept of electron shells in an atom, i.e. that the first shell can hold up to two electrons, the second up to eight, the third up to 18, etc.?
(I'm sure I don't understand all this. I've sat down and gone right through the chair onto the floor.)
This is a big fallacy of Karl Marx's theories. After a world-wide dictatorship is established and all people are brought under its control (i.e. the control of its leaders), a miracle occurs and--presto!--there is no longer any need for any government and paradise is attained!
The most miraculous thing of all is that some people are stupid enough to fall for this!
(Sorry to change the subject, but I just felt like a rant.)
They are charm-ing.
No. But it is a fix, because THEOretically the electrons should be able to exist in random “spin” states but they don’t seem to when they are in the same atomic orbital. So that became the Pauli exclusion principle. It doesn’t explain “why” but it is a widely accepted lynchpin for further discovery.
Early “physics” was called “natural philosophy”...now it seems to be driven by mathematical philosophy coupled with experiments which affirm the math or cast doubt on the mathematical model. Every “understanding” nowadays of physics seem to be tentative because it can be based on different maths. When they discover “Maxwells Demons” that’s gonna be a hoot.
IMHO.
QED
PAGING SHELDON COOPER
Paging Mayim Bialik, she’s an actual SCIENTIST!...........
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.