Posted on 09/11/2024 9:50:20 AM PDT by Navy Patriot
U.S. — Following last night's debate in which David Muir and Linsey Davis employed an impressive strategy against former President Donald Trump, news broke that Democrats have decided to replace Kamala Harris on the ballot with the ABC moderators.
Discussions began almost immediately after the debate to replace the Harris-Walz ticket with Muir-Davis based entirely on the moderators' ability to articulate Harris' positions and attack Trump better than she ever has.
"They really got her strongest points across," said one top Democratic Party official. "We loved the way they fought back against any facts Trump was presenting. They've mastered the art of twisting reality and playing fast and loose with truth, which is exactly what we look for in our candidates. It was staring us right in the face. We talked it over and figured, why not just go with them instead?'"
Muir and Davis were surprised but humbled by the news. "It will be an honor to serve," Muir said in a brief statement. "We have always done our very best to advance the cause of the Democratic Party, and now that we're being called upon to run for election, we would be shirking our responsibility as journalists not to answer the call. As members of the press, we always know what's best for all Americans. We can't wait to get into the White House."
At publishing time, Muir and Davis released a statement that they were looking forward to their next debate against Trump, which they would moderate themselves.
(Excerpt) Read more at babylonbee.com ...
This is too good!
Yes, these two moderators ambushed Trump. He never saw it coming.
It was an ambush followed by a lynching.
> He never saw it coming.
He should have. This is ABC. He walked into this trap willingly. Unfortunately.
Yes he did, he took them on 3 to 1, held his own, and made the points he needed to on the Economy and Immigration.
Attorney General Dave Yost
@DaveYostOH
There’s a recorded police call from a witness who saw immigrants capturing geese for food in Springfield. Citizens testified to City Council.
These people would be competent witnesses in court.
Why does the media find a carefully worded City Hall press release better evidence?
9:38 AM · Sep 11, 2024 250.4K Views
Maybe the democommies are reconsidering joementia after all?
As repulsive as (Disney) ABC moderators were, at least they have measurable IQs. Not much, but it’s there. As for the Ho, well, we know the Ho.
After Rona McDaniel’s departure GOP voters were led to believe that there would be some improvement in the moderator selection process. Just sayin.
The Democrats also announced that the donkey was a dated and obsolete symbol of the Democrat Party. It is being replaced by the cat.
Because they are Lying, Anti American, Degenerate, Marxist Traitors that Bugger Children.
Oh, BS. Trump was almost murdered by his opponents...ya think a debate against the media and commiela was a problem?
Logical, ... Marxist Democrats are all Whining Pussies.
“Yes he did, he took them on 3 to 1, held his own, and made the points he needed to on the Economy and Immigration.”
*************
Those are the two big issues in voters’ minds so staying focused on them was the smart thing for him to do.
Everyone knows where Trump stands on all the issues. He has solutions. Harris on the other hand did nothing to clarify her views or reassure voters with well thought out positions. All she did was attack Trump and pontificate with emotion laden platitudes. She didn’t make the big sell that she had to.
Good one..
He had a great response to the she’s not black question. Nobody cares.
I love the Bee!
"Democrats To Replace Kamala On Ballot With ABC Moderators"
Speaking of desperate elite Democrats unilaterally replacing ticket candidates, misguided Democrats probably screwed up big time when they replaced OBiden with OHarris imo.
More specifically, consider Section 2 of the 14th Amendment, that section a penalty for states where election-related fraud has occurred. Given the zero tolerance, "hair trigger" wording of that section, Democrats violated that section (imo) when they unilaterally threw out 14+ million primary votes for OBiden, replacing him with constitutionally unqualified (imo) OHarris.
"But when the right to vote at any election"
"is denied to any"
"or in any way abridged,"
"Section 2 of 14A: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election [all emphases added] for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State." [Apportionment of Representatives]
"Section 5 of 14A: The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article."
In fact, consider that the post-Civil War congressional Republicans who drafted Section 2 made it to discourage Southern Democrats (my words) from rigging the ballot boxes that Democrats are now alleged to have done for 2020, 2022 and possibly earlier elections!
"Because slavery (except as punishment for crime) had been abolished by the Thirteenth Amendment, the freed slaves would henceforth be given full weight for purposes of apportionment. This situation was a concern to the Republican leadership of Congress, who worried that it would increase the political power of the former slave states, even as such states continued to deny freed slaves the right to vote." —Apportionment of Representatives
With Section 2 in mind, consider that if this were a better world, in stark contrast to ignoring Section 2 like Pence and the J6 Congress seemingly did concerning alleged voting problems in 2020, the feds should actually be warning all states before an election that the feds will be darkening the doorway of any state to investigate allegations of possible violations of constitutional voting integrity protections.
Also, regarding possibly big problems with OHarris's constitutional eligibility for POTUS, if I understand correctly, neither of her parents were citizens when she was born. And if such is the case, note that the following information has removed any doubts for me that she is not a natural born citizen (NBC), therefore not qualified to be either POTUS or VP.
Regardless that media has presented NBC as a mystery because it is not defined in the Constitution but in the strange Law of Nations, it turns out that Justice John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, had clarified in an official note that the Law of Nations is as much US law as the Constitution is.
Excerpted from the writings of Chief Justice John Jay:
"That you may percieve more clearly the Extent and objects of your Inquiries, it may be proper to observe that the Laws of the united States admit of being classed under three Heads or3 Descriptions—1st. all Treaties made under the authority of the united States.—John Jay’s Charge to the Grand Jury, the Circuit Court for the District of Virginia, 22 May 17932dly. The Laws of nations [emphasis added]—
3dly. The Constitution, and Statutes of the united States—"
So OHarris does not satisfy the POTUS qualifications of constitutional drafters imo.
Since Congress and renegade states have repeatedly proven that they are an enemy of the people imo, it is now up to Democratic and Republican Trump supporters to effectively "impeach and remove" ALL (exceptions?) state and federal lawmakers and executives in November.
In fact, it's up to us Trump supporters to take the first MAJOR step in draining the swamp by supporting Trump 47 with a new, Constitution-respecting Congress, new state lawmakers too, not only so that he will not be a lame duck president from the first day of his second term, but will support him to quickly finish draining the swamp.
Finally, let's not allow the anti-Trump media try to fade our memories of what we witnessed on July 13.
Down the Memory Hole: Google Hides Autocomplete Suggestions Related to Trump Assassination Attempt (7.28.24)
This one didn’t make me LOL like the last one you posted. Even so, I still think it’s better than the last one. It could be due to them giving you SO MUCH TO WORK WITH !
I do agree that The Bee gives more to work with while still being accurate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.