Posted on 11/12/2021 1:36:42 PM PST by ransomnote
Wow. These numbers are brutal but entirely consistent with what many of us have realized recently.
The vaccines failed and are hurting.
Somehow I dropped the publication date, which was Nov 12, 2021. I didn’t know an article would or could post without a date. I apologize for the error. If you have time, would you add the publication date? Regardless, thank you for your time and attention.
PING
Watched the early morning NBC newscast this morning. News reader said all the cases and deaths were from the unvaccinated.
🖨BkMk
Some whistleblowers have said that the hospitals are not asking or recording patient’s vaccination status, and then referring to all of them as ‘unvaccinated.’ If the public only knew how blood thirsty the pandemic ‘handlers’ are.
If the chart is accurate, the chances of contracting the virus are significantly greater (in some age groups) if you have been vaxed.
That would destroy the entire argument to get the vax would it not?
That would destroy the entire argument to get the vax would it not?
In a sane world it would.
Sadly, that is not the world in which we live.
Great post, ransomnote.
The published numbers in England (not the UK) and in Israel have been shrieking this MINUS vaccination impact for at least two months.
If the chart is accurate, the chances of contracting the virus are significantly greater (in some age groups) if you have been vaxed.
That would destroy the entire argument to get the vax would it not?
~~~~~~~~
Yes. All reason to have the ‘vaccines’ have been publicly exposed as false. The only thing our enemies can do is pretend they didn’t hear anything about it and just keep parroting the talking points - and that’s what they are doing.
How can anything go below minus 100%?
if it’s true, the chances of getting covid are now 126% greater, but the question then becomes, will the vaccine protect against serious illness and death from covid? As claimed? Or are they lying about that too?
I wonder if folks can sue for being lied to and talked into getting vaxxed because they were old it would protect them 96%? But5 i imagine companies will claim “Noone ever said it would prevent catching covid, we only claimed that if you got it, you have a 96% less chance of dying”
In other words you’re more likely to get COVID if you get the shot
How can anything go below minus 100%?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The pharma companies used convoluted, deceptive calculations to make it seem like the ‘vaccines’ were effective. The CDC, NIH, FDA, Fauci and Walensky all were in on the sham.
So deceptive Relative Risk calculations were used to over report the false promise of the ‘vaccines’.
To accurately compare the ‘vaccines’ false promises to the ‘vaccines’ actual performance, it’s one again necessary to mirror the Pharma industry’s use of Relative Risk calculations. Suddenly the shills are disgusted with Relative Risk calculations and often sneer the results are ‘meaningless’. Using Relative Risk calculations before and after administration results in the most accurate comparison ‘before’ and ‘after’.
Note that the pharmas said efficacy was 95%. Keep in mind any positive number is considered to indicate to what extent the ‘vaccines’ are working.
When you start getting negative numbers for efficacy in this context, it means that people are more likely to get infected if they are ‘vaccinated’. :(
It is looking like an ugly cold and flu season.
Waiting for the democrat/media/big pharma/Faux-xi cheerleaders on here to say the death serum is perfectly safe with 98% efficacy.
thanks ill check that out
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.