Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Latest UKHSA Report shows the Covid-19 Vaccines have negative effectiveness as low as MINUS 126% as infections in the Fully Vaccinated soar
theexpose.uk ^ | theexpose.uk

Posted on 11/12/2021 1:36:42 PM PST by ransomnote

The latest report available from the UK Health Security Agency shows that the Covid-19 vaccines are now proving to have negative effectiveness in everyone over the age of 30 in the UK as low as minus-one-hundred-and-twenty-six-percent.

Pfizer claim that there Covid-19 mRNA injection has a vaccine effectiveness of 95%. They were able to claim this because of the following –

During the ongoing clinical trial, 43,661 subjects were split evenly between the placebo and vaccine groups (about 21,830 subjects per group).

In the placebo group — the group that didn’t have the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine — 162 became infected with the coronavirus and showed symptoms.

Whilst in the vaccine group — the group that got the real vaccine — that number was only 8.

Therefore the percentage of placebo group who became infected equated to 0.74% (162 / 21830 x 100 = 0.74).

Whilst 0.04% of the vaccinate group became infected (8 / 21830 x 100 = 0.04)

In order to calculate the efficacy of their Covid-19 mRNA injection, Pfizer then performed the following calculation –

They first subtracted the percentage of infections in the vaccinated group from the percentage of infections in the placebo group.

0.74% – 0.04% = 0.7%

Then they divided that total by the percentage of infections in the placebo group, which equated to 95%.

0.7 / 0.74 = 95%.

Therefore, Pfizer were able to claim that their Covid-19 mRNA injection is 95% effective.

We don’t need to go into the fact that this calculation was extremely misleading and only measured relative effectiveness rather than absolute effectiveness. Neither do we need to go into the fact that Pfizer chose to ignore thousands of other suspected infections during the ongoing trial and not perform a PCR test to confirm the infection because it would have thrown efficacy below the required minimum of 50% to gain regulatory approval.

The reason we don’t need to go into it is because the general public are being told that the Pfizer Covid-19 vaccine is 95% effective due to the calculation performed above. The same calculation was also used based on individual results to claim a vaccine efficacy of around 70% for AstraZeneca, and around 98% for Moderna.

Now, thanks to a wealth of data published by the new UK Health Security Agency we are able to use the same calculation that was used to calculate 95% effectiveness of the Pfizer vaccine, to calculate the real world effectiveness of the Covid-19 vaccines.

Table 3 of the UK Health Security Agency Vaccine Surveillance report, published November 11th 2021, shows the number of recorded infections by vaccination status between week 41 and week 44 of 2021. It also shows the confirmed case rate among persons fully vaccinated, and rates among persons not vaccinated per 100,000 people.

Pfizer had an equal amount of people who had been vaccinated, and had not been vaccinated in the ongoing clinical trial in order to calculate the effectiveness of their vaccine, so in order to calculate the real-world effectiveness all we have to do is perform the same calculation using the rates per 100,000 numbers supplied by the UK Health Security Agency, which are as follows –

The effictiveness of all available vaccines combined is as low as minus-126% within the 40-49 age group, and only as high as +13% in the 18-29 age group, the only age group other than the under 18’s that the vaccines are currently showing to have a positive effectiveness.

This proves that the Covid-19 vaccines are making people more susceptible to catching Covid-19, rather than preventing cases of Covid-19 by the claimed 95%, and the fact the effectiveness of the vaccines has now surpassed the minus-100% barrier in everyone between the age of 40 and 69, suggests that it has completely decimated their immune systems, at least when it comes to infection from the alleged SARS-CoV-2 virus.

By combining the numbers provided for all age groups over the age of 18, we have been able to calculate an average vaccine effectiveness of minus-69%, and we’re definitely seeing this in the number of confirmed cases by vaccination status.

Between week 41 and week 44 of 2021 there were 79,516 confirmed Covid-19 cases in the unvaccinated over 18’s, 25,554 confirmed cases in the partly vaccinated over 18’s, and a frightening 450,132 confirmed cases in the fully vaccinated over 18’s.

The new UK Health Security Agency report proves without a shadow of a doubt that the Covid-19 vaccines do not prevent infection or transmission.

 


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: braineatingqvirus; craycray; dumbingdownfr; fuzzymath; garbagesource; moreqmadness; notthisagain; pleasegethelp; qtard; qult; qvirus; ransomnut; theyrecrazyjim; tinfoiltime
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2021 1:36:42 PM PST by ransomnote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Wow. These numbers are brutal but entirely consistent with what many of us have realized recently.

The vaccines failed and are hurting.


2 posted on 11/12/2021 1:38:51 PM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote; Admin Moderator

Somehow I dropped the publication date, which was Nov 12, 2021. I didn’t know an article would or could post without a date. I apologize for the error. If you have time, would you add the publication date? Regardless, thank you for your time and attention.


3 posted on 11/12/2021 1:39:00 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathi; Unrepentant VN Vet; metmom; Fractal Trader; SecAmndmt; bagster; doc maverick; ...

PING


4 posted on 11/12/2021 1:39:41 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Watched the early morning NBC newscast this morning. News reader said all the cases and deaths were from the unvaccinated.


5 posted on 11/12/2021 1:41:43 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

🖨BkMk


6 posted on 11/12/2021 1:42:13 PM PST by greeneyes ( Moderation In Pursuit of Justice is NO Virtue--LET FREEDOM RING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: odawg

Some whistleblowers have said that the hospitals are not asking or recording patient’s vaccination status, and then referring to all of them as ‘unvaccinated.’ If the public only knew how blood thirsty the pandemic ‘handlers’ are.


7 posted on 11/12/2021 1:43:03 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

If the chart is accurate, the chances of contracting the virus are significantly greater (in some age groups) if you have been vaxed.

That would destroy the entire argument to get the vax would it not?


8 posted on 11/12/2021 1:45:12 PM PST by Signalman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

That would destroy the entire argument to get the vax would it not?


In a sane world it would.

Sadly, that is not the world in which we live.


9 posted on 11/12/2021 1:48:23 PM PST by volunbeer (Find the truth and accept it - anything else is delusional)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
COVID ping...

Great post, ransomnote.

The published numbers in England (not the UK) and in Israel have been shrieking this MINUS vaccination impact for at least two months.

10 posted on 11/12/2021 1:48:49 PM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

If the chart is accurate, the chances of contracting the virus are significantly greater (in some age groups) if you have been vaxed.

That would destroy the entire argument to get the vax would it not?
~~~~~~~~
Yes. All reason to have the ‘vaccines’ have been publicly exposed as false. The only thing our enemies can do is pretend they didn’t hear anything about it and just keep parroting the talking points - and that’s what they are doing.


11 posted on 11/12/2021 1:49:03 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

How can anything go below minus 100%?


12 posted on 11/12/2021 1:50:39 PM PST by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Signalman

if it’s true, the chances of getting covid are now 126% greater, but the question then becomes, will the vaccine protect against serious illness and death from covid? As claimed? Or are they lying about that too?

I wonder if folks can sue for being lied to and talked into getting vaxxed because they were old it would protect them 96%? But5 i imagine companies will claim “Noone ever said it would prevent catching covid, we only claimed that if you got it, you have a 96% less chance of dying”


13 posted on 11/12/2021 1:54:13 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob434

Thread on the deaths was just posted here:

https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4012259/posts


14 posted on 11/12/2021 1:57:33 PM PST by LilFarmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

In other words you’re more likely to get COVID if you get the shot


15 posted on 11/12/2021 1:57:37 PM PST by Mr. K (No consequence of repealing obamacare is worse than obamacare itself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dangus

How can anything go below minus 100%?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The pharma companies used convoluted, deceptive calculations to make it seem like the ‘vaccines’ were effective. The CDC, NIH, FDA, Fauci and Walensky all were in on the sham.

So deceptive Relative Risk calculations were used to over report the false promise of the ‘vaccines’.

To accurately compare the ‘vaccines’ false promises to the ‘vaccines’ actual performance, it’s one again necessary to mirror the Pharma industry’s use of Relative Risk calculations. Suddenly the shills are disgusted with Relative Risk calculations and often sneer the results are ‘meaningless’. Using Relative Risk calculations before and after administration results in the most accurate comparison ‘before’ and ‘after’.

Note that the pharmas said efficacy was 95%. Keep in mind any positive number is considered to indicate to what extent the ‘vaccines’ are working.

When you start getting negative numbers for efficacy in this context, it means that people are more likely to get infected if they are ‘vaccinated’. :(


16 posted on 11/12/2021 1:59:12 PM PST by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

It is looking like an ugly cold and flu season.


17 posted on 11/12/2021 2:05:14 PM PST by bray (Our patience is wearing thin Joe)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Waiting for the democrat/media/big pharma/Faux-xi cheerleaders on here to say the death serum is perfectly safe with 98% efficacy.


18 posted on 11/12/2021 2:05:44 PM PST by wastedyears (The left would kill every single one of us and our families if they knew they could get away with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LilFarmer

thanks ill check that out


19 posted on 11/12/2021 2:06:06 PM PST by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Signalman
>"If the chart is accurate, the chances of contracting the virus are significantly greater (in some age groups) if you have been vaxed. >That would destroy the entire argument to get the vax would it not?"

No it wouldn't, because until recently the vaccinated had a drastically lower chance of dying (and being hospitalized) with covid.

But wait! It turns out that the advantage the vaccinated have on these two fronts is collapsing rapidly, week after week.

see more discussion here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4012259/posts
20 posted on 11/12/2021 2:10:07 PM PST by Mount Athos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-39 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson