[dangus]

How can anything go below minus 100%?

[ransomnote]

How can anything go below minus 100%?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The pharma companies used convoluted, deceptive calculations to make it seem like the ‘vaccines’ were effective. The CDC, NIH, FDA, Fauci and Walensky all were in on the sham.

So deceptive Relative Risk calculations were used to over report the false promise of the ‘vaccines’.

To accurately compare the ‘vaccines’ false promises to the ‘vaccines’ actual performance, it’s one again necessary to mirror the Pharma industry’s use of Relative Risk calculations. Suddenly the shills are disgusted with Relative Risk calculations and often sneer the results are ‘meaningless’. Using Relative Risk calculations before and after administration results in the most accurate comparison ‘before’ and ‘after’.

Note that the pharmas said efficacy was 95%. Keep in mind any positive number is considered to indicate to what extent the ‘vaccines’ are working.

When you start getting negative numbers for efficacy in this context, it means that people are more likely to get infected if they are ‘vaccinated’. :(

[greeneyes]

Same way the stock market can go up to more than 100%. It’s a relative measure. When something doubles it’s up 200%. It can also go down 200%.