Posted on 08/08/2021 8:31:18 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
In a new study, scientists from the CNRS, Aix-Marseille University, and the French Blood Establishment (EFS) have examined the previously sequenced genomes of one Denisovan and three Neandertal females who lived 100,000 to 40,000 years ago, in order to identify their blood groups and consider what they may reveal about human’s evolutionary history. Of the 40-some known blood group systems, the team concentrated on the seven usually considered for blood transfusion purposes, the most common of which are the ABO (determining the A, B, AB, and O blood types) and Rh systems.
The findings bolster previous hypotheses but also offer new surprises. While it was long thought that Neandertals were all type O—just as chimpanzees are all type A and gorillas all type B—the researchers demonstrated that these ancient hominins already displayed the full range of ABO variability observed in modern humans. Extensive analysis covering other blood group systems turned up alleles that argue in favour of African origins for Neandertals and Denisovans.
(Excerpt) Read more at heritagedaily.com ...
There is no harm in believing what one wants like S&S forever, it is a right. But in turn, making an effort to go out of the way like S&S and try to “suppress” those who do not believe the same is wrong. It’s not a one way street...
You do realize it is not the religion thread right?
IT’S SCIENCE. THE BEGINNING AND THE END.
Neandertals and Denisovans are humans. They are more different race, than different species, as proven by evidence of interbreeding.
Read my comment to those guys above. I defended your right to believe as you like, it is absolutely your right. But purposely going out of your way to suppress the ideology of others is indeed wrong because it dogs their own right to believe as THEY like. They are not going out of their way to go over to the religion forum and try to suppress your ideology.
It is a two way street... The Constitution has granted this right for everyone, not just you... It is not “selective” like it or not. Don’t agree with it? Then don’t participate in it. At least they show this respect for the religion forums. They don’t go out of their way to go shove science down your throat. It would be wrong to do so.
Suppressing my right to voice my opinion on this thread goes against the definition of scientific reasoning. If you want exclusivity, label the thread atheist forum.
That is self righteous double speak. You know very well there is a difference between just an opinion and a campaign to suppress ideology.
I posted a comment
FUNGI and READY2BIRD suppressed ideology. Get your facts straight.
Ready2brd
Nope, absolutely backwards. You went out of your way to come swing at the OP and thread topic and try to suppress all further discussion about it first in an effort to create conflict...
See, this is a problem I am now seeing with the extremely faithful. They cannot even be honest about their own real actions. Always in denial, always self righteous.
And now you are actually trying to insult my intelligence by trying to claim the 180 opposite. As the “aggressor” you are now trying to claim yourself as the poor victim. lol
This dishonesty is why I got involved. I am so sick of the dishonest hypocrisy and lack of self accountability. But you are welcome for me first defending your right to believe what you like even though your intentions were to disrupt conversation.
YEP, MY BAD. Friends still don’t won’t me to go to blood bank.
An atheist scientist came to God and said, “We’ve figured out how to make a man without you.” God said, “OK, let me see you do it.” So the atheist bent down to the ground and scooped up a handful. But God stopped him and said, “Oh, no you don’t. Get your own dirt!
And now you are dodging.
Why not just admit that you read the tile of the thread and immediately thought “Wait! SCIENCE!!! God wills i that I go attack this blasphemy!”.
Because it is quite a common practice even though very few have the integrity to admit this was their true agenda. If you can’ help it, at least be proud of it and not deny it or try to spin it 180 from reality and put it onto others.
That would be the honest thing to do in representing your faith. Gives much more credit to both your faith and your conviction as being truly righteous by example.
Actually, I was scrolling on FR and happened upon the thread and placed a comment. Good day.
And have a great afternoon and a successful but sporting hunt to you back... :)
Your family eye color is similar to mine. My Dad had hazel eyes, Mom had blue/gray eyes. Older sister had hazel eyes.
Then I come along, “a cotton-top with black eyes” or so my mother said. They couldn’t figure it out.
My Dad was missing some of his permanent teeth, and I inherited that condition plus his B negative blood type.
Father’s people came from Alsace-Lorraine, mother’s were British.
“Ready2brd”
Ready to breed? Is that correct?
Acronym soup around here sometimes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.