Posted on 07/22/2021 6:18:07 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
One of the reasons for refusing the experimental covid vaccine is a lack of “ informed consent”.
The author presents his reasoning behind his refusal to take the covid vaccine in a succinct and clear manner
and presents connected incorporated 'hot links' to actual data to explain his position.
That was floating around the early releases.
That the vax was not a true vaccine, since it MAY not prevent infection, but a prophylactic treatment that MAY reduce the severity of infection.
Now, it is sliding away from even that.
But billions of dollars were spent making these treatment. Billions. The companies were promised by Trump to be made whole from the trials, and they are frantic to get their money back.
..a prophylactic treatment that MAY reduce the severity of infection.
A friend of mine who is an EMT told me the same thing.
In a limited way, it does make sense.
All vaccines have a potential to kill you. Look in the literature for even the flu vaccine (very safe). Some people go into shock and die.
But it creates a dangerous situation. I used the Remington trigger as an example for a reason. Rifles are by their nature, dangerous. Having some liability shield in place makes sense, but that in this case gave cover to a firm to market and make a poor design that got people hurt for decades, rather than have a recall.
It is a balancing act, and having seen it play out a few times I am not comfortable that this point with the treatments (especially since I had covid with few issues already pre vax).
Probably because he read the studies and the literature.
Not saying it is bad or good, but you need to be honest about things.
For your consideration about "profit" see below :
Included in the posted article is reason #13:
"FAUCI AND SIX OTHERS AT NIAID OWN PATENTS IN THE MODERNA VACCINE "
"Thanks to the Bayh-Dole Act, government workers are allowed to file patents on any research they do using tax payer funding."
"Tony Fauci owns over 1,000 patents (see this video for more details), including patents being used on the Moderna vaccine...which he approved government funding for."
"In fact, the NIH (which NIAID is part of) claims joint ownership of Moderna's vaccine. "
"Does anyone else see this as a MAJOR conflict of interest, or criminal even? "
"I say criminal because there's also this pesky problem that makes me even more distrustful of Fauci, NIAD, and the NIH in general. "
Great read. Thanks for posting.
>>> Notice how now that this has finally leaked out the naritive has changed from “get vaxxed and don’t get covid” to “get vaxxed to hopefully minimize the effects when you DO get covid”.
When people tell me they have been “vaccinated”, I ask them 2 questions....
1. Does the vaccine prevent you from getting the virus?
Answer: Always “yes”
2. Did you read the informed consent document?
Answer: Always “no” or “there wasn’t any” or “What is that”?
Only one reason I am not getting the vaccine-—Natural immunity!! We recovered Covid and I trust God’s vaccine way more than a “vaccine” directed and injected by corrupt Oligarchs!
That’s why we have terms like Big AG, Big Pharma. I think defense contractors were among the first in recent times but the railroad was long before that and banks aka Big Money is the original and sort of an umbrella group.
My son had to get the vax yesterday. He held off as long as he could. His job takes his into many countries. So it’s an entry qualification. He got the J&J. Crazy because he’s been in and out of every hot spot you can name since the beginning. Not even a sniffle. I prayed over him since the beginning and prayed over him before the shot. As of late last night his arm hadn’t hurt. He asked them to put it in his right arm (even tho it’s dominate) as it’s furthest from the heart. He didn’t want it snd held off as long as possible. Please say a prayer that he will be ok.
I will keep repeating this:
The key was always to protect the vulnerable, and very early on the data demonstrated that it was not the general population that was really vulnerable, in any fatal way, but a subset comprised of the very elderly, the obese, those with chronic heart, blood pressure or lung conditions, and those with diabetes, and even in all those cases fatalities skewed greater at older ages and less at younger ages. So, yes, the truly vulnerable needed protection. But the general population was never fatally vulnerable.
Instead of working out how to protect the vulnerable, officials chose the draconian measures of isolating all the non-vulnerable from each other as much as possible; and creating a false environment that they were all nice people for behaving with such nice herd mentality.
What is important to me is not whether or not I should have the vaccine, but that the author is not insane to have his legitimate reservations.
Yes, it is a complete conflict of interest and immunity for treatments cannot be extended to firms and government agencies that created the disease the treatment is for.
If they were guilty of making the banned gain-of-function bioweapon, they cannot be given immunity for the treatment. Other firms, yes, but not the disease creator.
Good read. Lots of info. Thank you.
Thank you very much for this outstanding post!
It is, and should be, a keeper.
Thank you for posting this. Perfect timing.
Today, I received a survey from my work regarding manadatory covid vaccines. This information will be helpful in responding to the survey. All that being said, I work in a university (the heart of darkness) and they will mandate the vaccine - regardless of what employees want. I’m retiring in December so I have nothing to lose in expressing grave concerns with this gene therapy.
Fifty Years Later: The Significance of the Nuremberg Code
><
Thanks very much!
My own personal rule is 10 years track record before I’ll accept a vaccine. By that time, I’ll be so old I won’t care.
In referenced Nuremberg Code have found four (4) positve referenced code rules to the vaccine
three (3) ambivalent/ mixed referenced outcomes
and three (3) negative violations to the experimental vaccine.
Your analysis might vary .
Included on the New England Journal of Medicine page is :
" The Nuremberg Code is the most important document in the history of the ethics of medical research.
The Code was formulated 50 years ago, in August 1947, in Nuremberg, Germany, by American judges sitting in judgment of Nazi doctors
accused of conducting murderous and torturous human experiments in the concentration camps (the so-called Doctors' Trial).
It served as a blueprint for today's principles that ensure the rights of subjects in medical research."
It's a tacit admission that the vaxxes don't work.
Have you noticed the organized suppression of any alternative thought of not taking the vaccine ?
Or, how there is no further discussion of "herd immunity", or,
the existence of "natural immunity", as is already found in children (?) , and yet there is a move afoot to vaccinate children ?
See profit motive, post #15, and response post #25
and remember to :" Follow the Money !"
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.