Posted on 07/22/2021 6:18:07 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
But, Blood cells are being replenished all the time. It’s not like the same rbc’s and platelets are circulating indefinitely. I think the lifespan of rbc’s are a few months.
Blood letting is a common practice for those who are high in iron.
A post the other day stated that the poster would not take the vaccine because those demanding that he take it were the ones who have lied about everything for the past five years!
That's even more of a reason than the one I gave.
Thanks for posting this.
Two more:
One
Early intervention treatment exists
And is effective when given in time
Prophylaxis measures exist also, and this is also relevant for those who have taken it
Reason one continued:
Do a search on
Peter McCullough and
Zev/Vladimir Zelenko
I’m sure there are others
Our own random note a while back posted on early intervention.
continued:
Two:
This is NOT a vaccine. It does not meet the legal or FDA definitions.
For more search on
Reiner Fuellmich and
David Martin.
There’s several videos out, a long one
that is devastating especially on the
patent history.
I also recommend Stew Peters interview with David Martin.
yeah... i would like to carry a copy around with me so that when people tell me i should get vaccinated, and then to proceed to tell me it protects against the virus, I can show them they are wrong.
This study from nature immunology: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41590-020-00808-x.pdf
Shows that the existing vaccines are worthless for building durable immunity since the data is that the nucleocapsid section, which the vaccines do not code, is where most of the pre-existing resistance against serious disease resides.
We now know they lied - it ain't a “novel” virus - 81% of the population in fact does have existing immunity.
The odds are that a healthy person under the age of 50 will not suffer significant harm, and will strengthen their immunity.
From a public health perspective this is preferable, because such immunity stops the disease from being of harm to the public on a durable basis. The JAB does not.
Children have substantial risk from the shot, and if healthy nada from the disease. Forcing Children to take the shot given the serious side effects is criminal.
And it is quite stupid to try to Vax your way out of an epidemic/pandemic. There's a reason they give flu shots before the flu season.
“And it is quite stupid to try to Vax your way out of an epidemic/pandemic. There’s a reason they give flu shots before the flu season”.
BINGO!!
I’m part of the control group too, I’m going to stay that way.
👍😉
Bkmk
it just reduces the effect of the symptoms to a more manageable and tolerant level, and prevents rampant hospitalization.
The term vaccine is a misnomer, and is being used intentionally since we all have had vaccines previously, and they are historically known to be reliable.
************************************************************************************
I sincerely have doubts that it even does that. Especially if you look at the 85% reduction Dr. McCullough has for his patients using multidrug treatment plan.
And the misnomer is why I call it a JAB, because it is NOT a traditional inactivated vaccine. Just a sly way of lying by using a familiar term to sucker people into believing it is something it is not.
bookmark
I agree with you.
Very interesting. I haven’t taken the shot and do not plan on taking it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.