Posted on 07/22/2021 6:18:07 AM PDT by Tilted Irish Kilt
Worth the reading and worth book marking.
“Did you read the informed consent document?”
Our kids were pushing us to get the jab. I read the informed consent document all the way through, we decided not only no but hell no.
YES!!!!
Just replied to Kaiser Permanente propaganda pushing the CoVID ‘vaccine’ narrative. The word ‘immunity’ was totally absent from their email. I criticized them for not making the t-cell test for CoVID antibodies available to their patients to be able to fully detect ‘herd immunity’, the goal of the experimental (not expressed in its propaganda) genetic treatment, aka, the ‘jab’. I followed the money and complimented them on their business plan of capitalizing on the damage from the CoVID spikes that will keep them solvent for decades.
>>> we decided not only no but hell no.
I wonder how many actually read it in line when the nurse is there waiting for you to sign before they jab you.
The enemy understands laziness and fear, and exploit both to their fullest.
I’ll guarantee that they did NOT want you actually reading that.
I’ve seen in “info document” on it which is similar, but not the actual informed consent. Can you post that?
“As soon as I was able I got the Shingrix vaccine and would recommend it for everyone.
Shingles is bad juju I wouldn’t wish on anyone.”
Concur. Similar experience and got the vaccine asap afterwards - had a persistent bothersome nodule (where the first symptoms occurred) on the back of my neck afterwards - finally had it removed - still itches now & then.
Same thing with pneumonia - get the shot if you’re a senior.
This covid vaccine I’m passing on for now altho the Novamax is looking like the one I will consider IF the prophylactic protocols I follow are ever proven to be lacking.
Prayer said...he may want to look into taking fish oil...and giving blood.
Thank you very much for posting this article. It’s a great summary of data that I have read from numerous sources. If someone is considering getting the jab, I highly recommend that they read this first.
Why giving blood? To remove it from the body?
That is a good one.
Just seen at :
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/white-house/biden-says-cdc-will-probably-recommend-kids-under-12-wear-n1274682
" Biden also said Wednesday that he hoped that the vaccines would become available to kids under 12 "soon,"
but he stressed that he was not pressuring the CDC or other health experts to rush to a decision."
"They're not promising me any specific date, but my expectation talking to the group of scientists we put together, over 20 of them,
plus others in the field, is that sometime maybe in the beginning of the school year, at the end of August, beginning of September, October,
they'll get a final approval," he said. "
Question : How does one get " informed consent " from a child under the age of 12 years old ?
I only need one reason: I don’t consent.
A better reason, because the Government said I need to!
I will see if I can find it. The one I read was a paper copy from Banner Health explaining that the vaccine was “experimental”, and approved for emergency use only. It also said that the vaccine “may not “ prevent you from getting covid. There was lots of legal boiler plate crap in the document as well.
I will see if I can find it. The one I read was a paper copy from Banner Health explaining that the vaccine was “experimental”, and approved for emergency use only. It also said that the vaccine “may not “ prevent you from getting covid. There was lots of legal boiler plate crap in the document as well.
My first reason for not getting the vaccine, is that they don’t even have an accurate test for Covid, so why would I get a vaccine for it. And although I’m not a scientist, didn’t play one on TV, and didn’t stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night, I believe the variants are being caused by the vaccines themselves.
So, I reviewed the FDA's analysis of ZOSTAVAX and its effectiveness against contracting shingles over time for adults aged 50-59. The results were interesting, eye-opening, and comparatively fascinating. In short:
-the stated intent of this vaccine is "Prevention of herpes zoster (shingles) in individuals 50 years of age and older."
-over seven years, 3.59% of the 1.4MM people under the study got shingles, or 0.5% per annum.
-over a median follow-up period of 1.3 years, the incidence of contracting shingles was 70% lower for the vaccine group vs placebo.
-for the first three years after the vaccine (e.g. keeping the period of observation fixed), the vaccinated group's incidence of contracting shingles was 60% lower than the placebo, but
-the relative incidence fell to 39% in the third year.
Now...by contrast, the COVID19 shots had, at most, maybe 14 to (I think) 28 days of observation after the second shot. The quoted percentages of about 96% effectiveness were based in this very narrow window of observation.
Further, the effectiveness of the shingles shot was tracked over VERY long time frames, and notice the fall-off after the third year. BUT...also notice the relative lack of deterioration in effectiveness during the initial 3 year period. Parenthetically, all the data, tracking, quality-control, and recording was centralized and standardized by Merck; you can hate on Merck all you want, but contrast that set-up with the relative mayhem and anarchy around COVID19 cases, hospitalizations, and fatalitiess and breakthrough situations.
Finally, the shingles vaccine doesn't "prevent" shingles but lowers your chance of contracting shingles. Frankly, I don't think that distinction is made clear.
The decision to get a shingles vaccine is a personal one. I can argue pro and con based on the data I reviewed. But I am not concerned about the integrity or thoroughness of the underlying analysis. And, for what it's worth, a 60-70% effectiveness over more than 28 days is what I would EXPECT to be the case.
Getting excited about a 96% reduction in COVID19 incidence two weeks after the last shot is akin to cheering that Ozzy Osbourne stayed sober three hours after leaving rehab.
Nobody has the time, or patience to do this relative comparison, grunt work. Except the CDC and media. From them...crickets. Small wonder we are stuck at 56% vaccination levels.
“Getting excited about a 96% reduction in COVID19 incidence two weeks after the last shot is akin to cheering that Ozzy Osbourne stayed sober three hours after leaving rehab.”
That is the money quote, right there!
I too still have itching in the group of nerves the shingles attacked.
Also I have some numbness (nerve damage I assume) that I will probably live with the rest of my days.
But I’ll take all that over full blown shingles ANY DAY.
“The decision to get a shingles vaccine is a personal one. I can argue pro and con based on the data I reviewed”
If you opt to not get the shingles vax and later come down with a full blown case of shingles I can assure you my friend the experience will certainly convince you. Lol
It thins the blood and also helps build new blood...men especially should give blood as they usually have more sluggish (iron) blood
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.