Posted on 03/14/2021 10:12:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
if you dont read the link, heres the key points:
“This is an mRNA, packaged in a fat envelope, delivered to a cell. This is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.”
“...under CDC and FDA standards, a vaccine specifically has to stimulate, both an immunity within the person receiving it but it also has to disrupt transmission. And that’s not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand going into the cell is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment.”
We have to end all medical treatment if that is the standard for which to base skepticism - people / clinics being paid for their services.
This is my No.1 question also. It doesn’t appear that the worthless NIH is in any hurry to answer this question. Just another reason to be highly suspicious of these jabs.
Correct. It does not enter the nucleus and mRNA disintegrates very quickly...it does not hang around.
I think some people are conflating this with the Astrazeneca vaccine which is not approved for use in the US...that one actually does send things into the nuclear membrane. That gives me pause, as that could influence the cell permanently - I don’t know that science on that, but what if cell while having the material reproduces through mitosis? What would the long term effect of that be?
I operate under 2 concepts while discussing the vaxx:
1. Informed consent vs government* order.
2. My body, my choice.
* As of now, there is no government order but the ideological fascists (Karen) are very active and vocal.
From what I’ve read, the mRNA doesn’t go away. Once triggered by a wild virus, our bodies continue to produce the spike protein causing an excessive immune response and auto-immune disease or worse. But we shall see a few months down the road. Unfortunately lab animal tests were skipped in the development.
Novavax’s COVID-19 vaccine was 89.7% effective in a large trial, and worked against the contagious virus variant first found in the UK; 96.4% effective against the original virus strain>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Also Novavax is not an mRNA based vaccine.It works much the same way that a flu vaccine does.It does not give your body genetic instructions via the immune system.
history will likely show that this vaccine is safe, effective without causing clotting and blood platelet disease obvious in a minority of people with Astrazenaca and Moderna applications.
These vaccines interfere or destroy the production of red blood cells in some patients, from the bone marrow out. No one knows why yet.
Novavax will not do that.
Excellent reading! A deeper document is the following, and provides a good understanding and further concerns with lockdowns, and how lockdowns can affect virulence, transmissibility, and detectability.
Giving legal immunity to the pharmas essentially turned the US populace into a testing “sample”.
Bkmk
The mRNA infects a tiny number of ells and tricks then into producing the protein that the virus uses to attach to cells. The immune system recognizes the protein as foreign and is stimulated to produce an immune reaction that kills the cells.
This immune response is exactly what a normal vaccine does also.
The mRNA vaccines do this in such small amounts that it takes two shots to achieve 90+% immunity.
Conventional vaccines also do not 'kill' the virus, but stimulate the immune system to do so.
What about the Johnson & Johnson vaccine?
It is NOT an mRNA vaccine.
Yup.
Been sayin that since Day 1.
This is what it really does and there is no turning back, All of this for a virus that is over 95% survivable.
It still delivers the spike protein in a bubble and uses human tissue to do it.
Quit using Israel. They have become a total covid police state.
It is NOT an mRNA vaccine.
Thats is correct., The use DNA instead of mRNA, but still the vaccine gives instructions to the immune system to create something. Its far mor ugged than the mRNA vaccines. It does not require lipid bubbles in which to put the virus cells into the blood. Some people think that the problems with the mRNA vaccines are in the exterior lipid lining which is made from glycol.One of these is Dr. Tenpenny.
If you support that theory, then J&J is a safe vaccine. But Novavax is even safer mainly because it works the way traditional flu vaccines do, without giving genetic instructions to our immune systems to create something.
Perhaps a visit to the dump will let you be around all the real scientists. After all, the RAT party and the Great Reset are all about science. Ask Dr Fauci and Bill Gates.
Well O.K. One set of lawyers nearly a century ago got the SCOTUS to set the definition of “vaccine” a certain way.
But when do lawyers NOT get terms set in some way that benefits someone.
If we had all the lawyers out of the room, we’d likely never have defined “a vaccine” in law as it was done nearly a century ago at the SCOTUS.
I think legal definitions are the least important “science” that we need to know about an issue, any issue.
So, when will the Novavax vaccine be approved fo use in the USA?
So basically, it's no better than HCQ or Ivermectin, two known safe drugs. This is nothing more than a form of conditioning people to obey without question, just like masks.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.