Posted on 03/14/2021 10:12:18 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man
if you dont read the link, heres the key points:
“This is an mRNA, packaged in a fat envelope, delivered to a cell. This is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.”
“...under CDC and FDA standards, a vaccine specifically has to stimulate, both an immunity within the person receiving it but it also has to disrupt transmission. And that’s not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand going into the cell is not to stop transmission. It is a treatment.”
Further white house press sec Jen Psaki has lied on video to people saying this has been fully tested, and that it is fda-approved. It has not been fully tested but has an experimental waiver, and it is not fda-approved at all.
After all the lies and 2020 voter fraud you would think would not trust the government and anything to do with covid vaccines but people are really stupid.
Did I get that right?
In other news, water is wet, etc.
Pure idiocy for idiots.
The mRNA vaccine produces a defensive response to the ‘spike’ protein the Covid virus uses to infect cells.
The mRNA vaccine induces production of antibodies against the ‘spike’.
Whatever the faults of the vaccine, or really the health profession - which has us failed here- this is a valid “vaccine”.
You don’t either read or cmprehend english well.
Its not a vaccine. Not by the legal or the CCD/FDA’s own definitions of what they consider a vaccine.
Clear as day.
there should be an uproar....the traditional media would have covered this 24/7.
Clear to me that you’re a fool.
But “you kooks have a ball” as we used to say...
If the mRNA approach stimulates an immune response against the spike protein, how would that not disrupt transmission? Note that conventional vaccines, i.e. using deactivated virus particles, similarly promote an immune response against the coat proteins - and this somehow does disrupt transmission.
The big question is, what is anyone going to do about it?
Last I saw in the news seventy million people are considered insurrectionists, conspiracy theorist racists, anti vaxers and racists.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cqrZOgV4ZTQ
Apparently "vaccine" won't necessarily stop a person from transmitting....all it's apparently good for is subduing symptoms. Someone is making a ton of money for this and the lock down mentality is to soften us up for The Great Reset.
“This is a medical device designed to stimulate the human cell into becoming a pathogen creator.”
In that case it is designed to turn people into Covid-19 creators and spreaders, right?
They’re a legally defined term under CDC and FDA standards, and a vaccine specifically has to stimulate, both an immunity within the person receiving it but it also has to disrupt transmission. And that’s not what this is. They have been abundantly clear in saying that the mRNA strand going into the cell is not to stop transmission.
But the mRNA strand causes the cell to produce the protein in question which the body then develops the immune response to. This is like saying that the smallpox vaccine using vaccinia virus wasn't a vaccine because it didn't produce an immune response but rather caused your body to produce more vaccinia viruses. But that is how it produced immunity to the smallpox variola virus - by having the body create enough of the related vaccinia virus to create an immune response.
I would have to see the exact legal definition of a vaccine to see why the smallpox vaccine would count and the mRNA vaccines by Pfizer and Moderna don't - and even then I would say that the law is falling behind the science.
Moderna was started as a chemotherapy company for cancer, not a vaccine manufacturer for SARS-COV2.
And BMW started as a manufacturer of airplane engines. Does that mean every BMW on the road is really an airplane? Companies evolve and add new expertise. Using Moderna's origins is a silly argument.
I tried to watch the linked video, but only the first minute showed where Dr. Martin was defining a vaccine but no further information.
Perhaps Fauci is lying to make his investments worth more...
I know, you could never believe he would do that LOL!
SEM: Thank you for posting.
Unlike some here, I am not expert, and I don’t state opinion as fact...
However, I am linking to a woman who has 21 years of research and experience in the field of vaccines. She provides a very easy-to-understand summary of what MRNA PFE, and J&J jabs are and are not...
If you are not a Christian, please disregard the beginning 2 minutes and a couple of Christian references within the video:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iaKAWWGyWI
For those who think she is too simplistic, here is link to a much more detailed talk: She begins at 26:17
https://www.bitchute.com/video/NQCMvUBDN83O/
I am not anti-vax, but I am in no hurry to get the current offerings of COVID vaccines.
Novavax’s COVID-19 vaccine was 89.7% effective in a large trial, and worked against the contagious virus variant first found in the UK; 96.4% effective against the original virus strain
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3942243/posts
Thank you for posting this...I have heard of this doc, but had not found his videos...
I have heard it described as a “biologic.”
Whatever these cv19 gene therapies are, they are not necessary. The scamdemic would have completely failed without the restrictions on effective treatments, without the social media bans on discussing those treatments, without the phony death numbers, if we had adopted a basic public health measure of testing everyone for vitamin D levels and then raising them as needed, and on and on.
Anyone claiming to be against CCP infiltration of America is delusional if they think they can stop CCP while going along with the scamdemic narrative.
It is very possible the formula was invented before the virus.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.