Posted on 02/06/2021 7:40:41 PM PST by JewishRighter
I have three points on Mike Lindell's film "Absolute Proof":
1. Mike should have used a professional presenter. I love his passion for truth and his courage for sticking his neck out, but it was hard listening to his rather loud "pitchman" voice for 2 hours and his sort of ham-handed leading questions ("so this is absolute proof, right?").
2. The money part, which showed the listed foreign hacks into the election and the video animation showing the pathway of the hacks on the map, was, in general excellent and powerful. I believe it would have been better if some background was given on how this information was collected and prepared for presentation. As it was shown, it could easily be attacked as something anyone could have just typed up and the video animation could have simply been created by capable computer video specialists.
3. It was too long. I think he should have kept it to a half hour at most, perhaps leading with a few of the key experts in shorter, sharper segments and then getting more quickly to the "money part" showing the actual hacking data and video.
What say ye, FReinds?
“A few follow-up releases that go into each specific crime, perhaps with more details, from the experts, would serve a purpose.”
This ᴧ
Secondly, I see this as Mike taking all the clips and random info across the net and putting all of it in one place. There's a good chance a lot of us have heard a lot of this information before, from one place or another, but now it is in one continuous stream. He didn't do it for the entertainment value, because nothing to do with this subject has any entertainment value.
I salute him for what none of us even attempted to do, but everybody wants to critique. He is a true patriot. God bless him.
I saluted him, too, but I don’t see why it is wrong to suggest how this could be improved. After all, don’t we all want to see this have an impact on public opinion and beliefs? If people find it difficult to sit through because of length or presentation issues, it is worthwhile sharpening and trimming it to make it more effective. I want Mike to succeed!
I repectfully disagree. Mike saw a need, had a short time to fill that need and he, in my opinion, is VERY beliveable. As to the length of the video Mike is a folkys sort of guy and a Christian and I believe he gets a bit off subject some times but he connects with a lot of people. I think he did fine. He won't get an emmy or whatever they are called but oh well....
I agree!
Well done!
Each segment led in to the next.
He DID do a great job. Lazy Americans need to increase their attention spans. Then maybe they wouldn’t be so plain stupid.
I concur, and Mr. Lindell probably would, too. We are just getting started. The nature and extent of this “problem” will not just evaporate.plenty to explore. Lindell just scratches the surface.
Independent 'pedes were doing this on their own.
I watched an hour of Flashpoint which was riveting from a couple days ago with Mike, Mario and Doug Wead. Excellent.
Then I watched this two hour video and plan to watch it with my husband tomorrow as he’s the geek of the house!
EXCELLENT and I agree totally with your assessment.
I am stoked and stand that Trump will be in office soon and we’ll be in revival mode!!! Thank you JESUS!!!
look at Peter Navarro’s reports on the interne3t with huge info about the cheating..............
He
Steve Bannon had him on War Room Sat. Lindell challenged Dominion to come on a live show with him and refute his evidence. He said if they don’t, he will file a defamation suit against them, then there will be discovery and it will all come out.
Lindell is a lot like Trump. He’s like the recovering addict version of Trump!
Even when he was on drugs, he was successful, and highly motivated...a bundle of energy. And he’s a born salesman, who likes to connect with the public. Just like Trump, what some people view as “folksy”, others view as “tacky”.
I think Lindell is the perfect guy to be making a video like this. We have become an infomercial society, going back to the days of Sy Sperling’s hair club for men. This is a perfect format for getting the message out. A lot of people will watch just based on his “ironic” pop culture status.
I just want to express my gratitude for what Mike did. I didn’t post this just to knock him down, but I think this could be significantly improved and made more effective.
+++++
I don’t agree with you but your comments are reasonable. I think Mike the Narrator is part of the magic. He is trusted. That’s a characteristic that is hard to find these days. I think that trust is very important. Mike may be mistaken in some of his claims (or maybe he isn’t) but he is not lying.
As to the animation I have mixed feelings. If he has proof that this demonstrates successful hacking I missed it. Attempted hacking would be expected and seems likely. But there is a big difference between attempting and succeeding.
I thought the presentation had the events and facts down pretty good.
The evidence needed solid sourcing to give proper weight.
Mike is great, but it lacked a good flow and there were too many splices, starts and stops thus interrupting the flow.
One of the guests sounded just like Barney from the Andy Griffith show. I kept thinking that our domestic enemies will only character assassinate anyone who courageously stands up for America’s survivable.
I hope we can just get a court to present our evidence and let the chips fall...
True. Mike did a great job. He starts by pointing out two miracles. I was hooked. The experts were great. No doubt: the election was stolen by non-Americans. Everyone should be alarmed.
Thx for report. My GF listened to it tonight and said it was good. But when i heard the discussion about the hacking i was skeptical. How did they get the actual hacking information and is it relevant. I lean toward the old fashioned ballot stuffing as no one in government is smart enough for the technical stuff.
Exactly RIGHT!
Everyone uses the terms "I'm appalled"... "it's outrageous"... "I'm Horrified by what's happened"... just a LOT of TALK but NO ACTION.
INDICT and PROSECUTE for TREASON, SEDITION, and GOVERMENT OVERTHROW, with some SERIOUS SENTENCES and JAIL TIME for ALL implicated.
Time to quit SCREWIN' around and DROP the HEAVY HAMMER.
That's the problem.
In the "court of public opinion" Mike Lindell has convinced us, hands down, that he personally believes what he's saying.
And we can easily agree that it sounds reasonable.
But in a court of law standards of proof are vastly higher, and Mike's video comes nowhere near meeting that standard.
So Mike's (and our!) problem is: somewhere, somehow at least some of the data must be legally established as "facts".
Without that, everything he presented is just harmless "opinion".
And there's a second humongous issue: it's one thing to claim some underage minors voted, or a few out-of-state residents -- to which the response is always, "ho-hum, boys will be boys, nothing important to see here, move along."
It's something very different to claim that voting machines have been programmed or hacked to change individual votes, or tallies, by the millions!
In the end, Lindell claims that Trump actually received 80 million votes and Biden only 68 million.
That is an extraordinary claim requiring extraordinary proof, of which, to date, not even single vote has been proved to be changed by machine or internet hacking.
Until there is legal proof of any of it, all of it remains in doubt.
Foreign influance!
1. Too long, and could use more professional narration and explanation. That having been said, one has to admire Lindell for his guts and determination.
2. The data given in the first part of the video needs additional clarification. Some numbers (apparently) seem absolutely verifiable: (just making up a value here) something like “6,738 ballots from dead voters” seems like something one could come up with actual proof for. But other numbers were clearly estimates - for one of the states numbers like ‘1,000 of this’ and ‘7,000 of that’ were certainly not correct to 4 significant figures, and had to be approximations - and should have been presented as such.
3. The spread sheet in the last half hour contained the most powerful data - if true and verifiable - and as such required the most stringent verification: extreme claims require solid support, and if one totals the number of votes presumably taken from the Trump column, that’s pretty extreme. Some FReepers yesterday contended the target IP addresses didn’t appear to be associated with voting locations - if the woman in question was actually an expert in internet fraud, that seems like an odd oversight, but I have no idea if those claims were legit or not. And I’d be really curious to find out how they knew Trump votes were removed, and how they knew those numbers down to the exact individual number of ballots. If I was on a jury deciding this matter, that’s a key thing you’d have to convince me of.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.