Posted on 02/06/2021 7:40:41 PM PST by JewishRighter
Evidently in watching Mike Lindell's presentation you did NOT watch from 1 hour 36 minutes in and on.
I call that "ABSOLUTE PROOF" which when presented in a court of law becomes SOLID EVIDENCE and UNDENIABLE PROOF
You're "right as rain"... hats off to ya Mama!
“Why does anything have to be tightly scripted to be believed.”
Trump was often criticized by the talking heads for the same thing, for talking like a human being, instead of a preprogrammed and rehearsed teleprompter reader.
It’s one of the things people loved about him. He came across as imperfect (like most humans) but sincere and genuine (unlike most politicos and fake news reporters).
I agree with what you wrote. I couldn’t listen to the whole thing. And, I agree with the documentation of the assertions he made.
Im sure he struggled with how to whittle it all down and still present the facts.
I think the same as you on this. I suppose there could be an argument for having a paid actor but IMO that negates the purpose and the presentation would probably still be being rehearsed. I really admire the guy for sticking his neck out, as well as the attorney from Michigan.
Well said!
Succinctly and graciously stated!
Here we have a guy spending 3 million of his own money and taking time and energy and GUTS to expose an election steal!
And for his efforts he has to endure......’ if only’ criticism from folks who haven’t lifted a hand or voice to help!
Good mercy.....I am so tired of the naysayers here!
Got bless Mike! Yes, we can pick apart things that could have been better, but this man has put it ALL on the line, as our
Founding Fathers did. We need a million Mike Lindells!
Our side simply does not do these types of things well.
We have trouble presenting visual things effectively.
There are good people out there who know how to do these sorts of things, but for some reason they are though unnecessary.
We pledge
Our Sacred Honor!
.
Founding Fathers.
I watched all two hours, beginning to end, was very impressed that Mike Lindell believes his numbers are facts.
The data & claims seemed to me certainly strong enough to form probable cause and/or sufficient predicate for massive law enforcement investigations and legal actions wherever the data can be verified.
But a video, in an of itself, is not verification and actual verification must, must, must include not only intense scrutiny of every data element, but also rigorous cross examination, of which, of course, Mike Lindell presented none.
VideoDoctor: "I call that "ABSOLUTE PROOF" which when presented in a court of law becomes SOLID EVIDENCE and UNDENIABLE PROOF"
Maybe.
Believe me, I hope you're right.
That whole election stinks to high heaven, I think, and I'd love, love, love to see it smashed to hades.
Mike Lindell's video is important in the "court of public opinion", but does not, by itself, get us there.
I'm guessing we think alike on this.
Yes!
Does anybody know where we can get those documents? If you search for them all you get is a long list of YouTube pulling the video. Please let me know if there is a download place for that documentation. Thank you.
I think the proof is there in the documentation. Also in the words of the witnesses who have provided statements UNDER THREAT OF PURGERY. There is no way Mike could have put all of this evidence into his 2-hour documentary. First of all, I doubt many of us have the attention span for wading through 1000 pages of forensic evidence, (many talking about the 2-hour video did not even sit through it)and most of the evidence is probably something we would barely understand. When you start talking about computers and hacking, you step above most peoples’ pay grade (IQ)of understanding. I fear no jury would convict because no jury would understand.
Oh, STFU! (Shut The Fun Up)
First, love Mike Lindell and his pillows!
But, he shouldn’t have used is “My Pillow” commercial techniques to sell this info.
Since this is so important, ALL the data should have been validated and sourced. Then it should have been presented in a “non-techy” way to keep the audience from zoning out. The hyperbole should have been left out and it would have been much better if the “experts” could have been interviewed in person. The remote stuff becomes very difficult to follow, especially when they speak over each other.
All that being said, if the information is valid (which I suspect most of it is), it does support the claims of fraud, illegal activities and an illegitimate election. The collective information along with verified, time-stamped surveillance videos and affidavits, should be enough to get this into the courts.
Should be . . .
It’s one of the things people loved about him. He came across as imperfect (like most humans) but sincere and genuine (unlike most politicos and fake news reporters).
President Trump spoke directly to the American people. He wasn't scripted to the point where he couldn't deviate to share what was on his mind. Mike Lindell also connects well with the average American with his down to Earth style.
I think we agree, hope you're right, just wish our side can find ways to present & prove the data in venues which result in corrective actions.
It's important.
Saw that too. Great move.
“He said if they don’t, he will file a defamation suit against them”
I got the impression he’s going to sue them anyhow and his lawyers are researching the best way to go about it, defamation being one. There must be five very good reasons, loss of income being one (not sure of the legalese), I think.
I can sympathize with how difficult it is to narrow down a presentation. As a lawyer, I often write very freely, putting down all thoughts and arguments and then go back and edit. It can be excruciating to strike out phrasing and points that I feel strong about.
I also know that Mike was struggling with a timing problem: he had to get the piece ready and present it before information leaked out that would then be preemptively attacked by big tech, Dominion, MSM, Democrats: the whole pack of hyenas. I get it. My “review” was just a starting point for discussion.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.