Evidently in watching Mike Lindell's presentation you did NOT watch from 1 hour 36 minutes in and on.
I call that "ABSOLUTE PROOF" which when presented in a court of law becomes SOLID EVIDENCE and UNDENIABLE PROOF
I watched all two hours, beginning to end, was very impressed that Mike Lindell believes his numbers are facts.
The data & claims seemed to me certainly strong enough to form probable cause and/or sufficient predicate for massive law enforcement investigations and legal actions wherever the data can be verified.
But a video, in an of itself, is not verification and actual verification must, must, must include not only intense scrutiny of every data element, but also rigorous cross examination, of which, of course, Mike Lindell presented none.
VideoDoctor: "I call that "ABSOLUTE PROOF" which when presented in a court of law becomes SOLID EVIDENCE and UNDENIABLE PROOF"
Maybe.
Believe me, I hope you're right.
That whole election stinks to high heaven, I think, and I'd love, love, love to see it smashed to hades.
Mike Lindell's video is important in the "court of public opinion", but does not, by itself, get us there.
I'm guessing we think alike on this.