I think the proof is there in the documentation. Also in the words of the witnesses who have provided statements UNDER THREAT OF PURGERY. There is no way Mike could have put all of this evidence into his 2-hour documentary. First of all, I doubt many of us have the attention span for wading through 1000 pages of forensic evidence, (many talking about the 2-hour video did not even sit through it)and most of the evidence is probably something we would barely understand. When you start talking about computers and hacking, you step above most peoples’ pay grade (IQ)of understanding. I fear no jury would convict because no jury would understand.
I think we agree, hope you're right, just wish our side can find ways to present & prove the data in venues which result in corrective actions.
It's important.