Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rogue Planets That Float in Space Without Orbiting a Sun Could Outnumber the Stars
Scitechdaily.com ^ | August 21, 2020 | By Ohio State University

Posted on 08/21/2020 11:37:55 AM PDT by Red Badger

Artist’s conception of SIMP J01365663+0933473, a planetary-mass object beyond our Solar System. The object, about a dozen times more massive than Jupiter is traveling through space unaccompanied by any parent star.. Credit: Chuck Carter, NRAO/AUI/NSF

================================================================================

Upcoming NASA mission will search for planets in the Milky Way without their own sun.

An upcoming NASA mission could find that there are more rogue planets — planets that float in space without orbiting a sun — than there are stars in the Milky Way, a new study theorizes.

“This gives us a window into these worlds that we would otherwise not have,” said Samson Johnson, an astronomy graduate student at The Ohio State University and lead author of the study. “Imagine our little rocky planet just floating freely in space — that’s what this mission will help us find.”

The study was published today in the Astronomical Journal.

The study calculated that NASA’s upcoming Nancy Grace Roman Space Telescope could find hundreds of rogue planets in the Milky Way. Identifying those planets, Johnson said, will help scientists infer the total number of rogue planets in our galaxy. Rogue, or free-floating, planets are isolated objects that have masses similar to that of planets. The origin of such objects is unknown, but one possibility is they were previously bound to a host star.

“The universe could be teeming with rogue planets and we wouldn’t even know it,” said Scott Gaudi, a professor of astronomy and distinguished university scholar at Ohio State and a co-author of the paper. “We would never find out without undertaking a thorough, space-based microlensing survey like Roman is going to do.”

The Roman telescope, named for NASA’s first chief astronomer who was also known as the “mother” of the Hubble telescope, will attempt to build the first census of rogue planets, which could, Johnson said, help scientists understand how those planets form. Roman will also have other objectives, including searching for planets that do orbit stars in our galaxy.

That process is not well-understood, though astronomers know that it is messy. Rogue planets could form in the gaseous disks around young stars, similar to those planets still bound to their host stars. After formation, they could later be ejected through interactions with other planets in the system, or even fly-by events by other stars.

Or they could form when dust and gas swirl together, similar to the way stars form.

The Roman telescope, Johnson said, is designed not only to locate free-floating planets in the Milky Way, but to test the theories and models that predict how these planets formed.

Johnson’s study found that this mission is likely to be 10 times more sensitive to these objects than existing efforts, which for now are based on telescopes tethered to the Earth’s surface. It will focus on planets in the Milky Way, between our sun and the center of our galaxy, covering some 24,000 light years.

“There have been several rogue planets discovered, but to actually get a complete picture, our best bet is something like Roman,” he said. “This is a totally new frontier.”

Rogue planets have historically been difficult to detect. Astronomers discovered planets outside Earth’s solar system in the 1990s. Those planets, called exoplanets, range from extremely hot balls of gas to rocky, dusty worlds. Many of them circle their own stars, the way Earth circles the sun.

But it is likely that a number of them do not. And though astronomers have theories about how rogue planets form, no mission has studied those worlds in the detail that Roman will.

The mission, which is scheduled to launch in the next five years, will search for rogue planets using a technique called gravitational microlensing. That technique relies on the gravity of stars and planets to bend and magnify the light coming from stars that pass behind them from the telescope’s viewpoint.

This microlensing effect is connected to Albert Einstein’s Theory of General Relativity and allows a telescope to find planets thousands of light-years away from Earth–much farther than other planet-detecting techniques.

But because microlensing works only when the gravity of a planet or star bends and magnifies the light from another star, the effect from any given planet or star is only visible for a short time once every few million years. And because rogue planets are situated in space on their own, without a nearby star, the telescope must be highly sensitive in order to detect that magnification.

The study published today estimates that this mission will be able to identify rogue planets that are the mass of Mars or larger. Mars is the second-smallest planet in our solar system and is just a little bigger than half the size of Earth.

Johnson said these planets are not likely to support life. “They would probably be extremely cold, because they have no star,” he said. (Other research missions involving Ohio State astronomers will search for exoplanets that could host life.)

But studying them will help scientists understand more about how all planets form, he said.

“If we find a lot of low-mass rogue planets, we’ll know that as stars form planets, they’re probably ejecting a bunch of other stuff out into the galaxy,” he said. “This helps us get a handle on the formation pathway of planets in general.”

Reference: 21 August 2020, Astronomical Journal.


TOPICS: Arts/Photography; Astronomy; History; Science
KEYWORDS: astronomy; catastrophism; nancygraceroman; rogueplanet; rogueplanets; science; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Red Badger

Rogue Planets = Death Stars


21 posted on 08/21/2020 12:24:31 PM PDT by RedMonqey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

In development. Bet it sucks.

https://www.imdb.com/title/tt0455856/?ref_=fn_al_tt_2


22 posted on 08/21/2020 12:29:52 PM PDT by gymbeau (I refuse to be anonymous. I am THEnonymous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: gymbeau

nuts!


23 posted on 08/21/2020 12:35:01 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Those rouges! Gotta watch them rouge planets. Sneaking around out there.

So, just the red ones, then?

24 posted on 08/21/2020 12:44:46 PM PDT by TangoLimaSierra (To the Left, The Truth is Right Wing Extremism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: gymbeau
I see it going one of two ways. Remember about 20 years ago with those competing asteroid movies? It'll either be a loud, effects-laden video for a rock soundtrack like Armageddon, or it'll be a ponderous, shoe-gazing snorefest like Deep Impact. I'm betting the latter. (Although Deep Impact did have one thing going for it: Téa Leoni dies at the end. She irritates me for some reason.)
25 posted on 08/21/2020 12:52:39 PM PDT by Viking2002 ("If a really stupid person becomes senile......how can you tell?" - George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I have always wondered about rogue planets being out there...
thanks for this.

I wondered about there being dark gas giants out there with their own solar systems.
Gas giants that just didn’t quite have that oomph to turn into a shining star..


26 posted on 08/21/2020 12:53:20 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mowowie

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brown_dwarf


27 posted on 08/21/2020 12:57:09 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: gymbeau; BenLurkin

Updated: 24 April 2017


28 posted on 08/21/2020 12:58:10 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Viking2002

You may be right. I don’t like remakes in general but there are exceptions, like Cronenberg’s The Fly and Spielberg’s War of the Worlds.

I guess we’ll find out.


29 posted on 08/21/2020 12:59:46 PM PDT by gymbeau (I refuse to be anonymous. I am THEnonymous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Ah....yes

Thanks for reminding me.


30 posted on 08/21/2020 1:05:54 PM PDT by mowowie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Maybe this is where all the ‘dark matter’ is hiding.


31 posted on 08/21/2020 1:07:58 PM PDT by Track9 (Islam: Turning everything it touches to ShiÂ’ite since 632 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Track9

Yep, hiding in plain sight...............


32 posted on 08/21/2020 1:10:36 PM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: gymbeau
Agreed. Some classics should be left to stand alone. An exception, for example, would be John Carpenter's '82 remake of The Thing with Kurt Russell. Carpenter actually stuck closer to the original story monster-wise than did the '51 Howard Hawks version, but most other aspects followed the same plotline, and side-by-side, they were eventual equals as far as how they're viewed today. Both had great ensemble casts. That remake-of-a-remake (a pseudo-prequel, actually) that was done about ten years ago was a stinkbomb.
33 posted on 08/21/2020 1:15:45 PM PDT by Viking2002 ("If a really stupid person becomes senile......how can you tell?" - George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Like the book Jupiter theft.


34 posted on 08/21/2020 1:59:23 PM PDT by BiteYourSelf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: 75thOVI; Abathar; agrace; aimhigh; Alice in Wonderland; AnalogReigns; AndrewC; aragorn; ...
Thanks Red Badger.


The Rogue Planets kw, chrono:

35 posted on 08/21/2020 2:11:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Imagine an imaginary menagerie manager imagining managing an imaginary menagerie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

How much mass is missing, now?


36 posted on 08/21/2020 2:38:22 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (60 in '20. Now, more than ever! (61, I didn't take into account Mittens.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: depressed in 06
How much mass is missing, now?

Excellent question.

37 posted on 08/21/2020 2:42:38 PM PDT by aimhigh (THIS is His commandment . . . . 1 John 3:23)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

There was a 1950s novel where a rogue pair of planets enters our solar system, smash Earth, and the survivors have to jump to the new world that happens to have domed cities left over by THAT world’s former survivors.


38 posted on 08/21/2020 3:39:48 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: granite

That’s aside from ones ejected from multi-sun systems, whether they formed as binaries or one caught another.


39 posted on 08/21/2020 3:48:49 PM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jmacusa
Rouge planets?

Next they will announce the discovery of mascara planets.

40 posted on 08/21/2020 3:56:50 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson