Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gymbeau
Agreed. Some classics should be left to stand alone. An exception, for example, would be John Carpenter's '82 remake of The Thing with Kurt Russell. Carpenter actually stuck closer to the original story monster-wise than did the '51 Howard Hawks version, but most other aspects followed the same plotline, and side-by-side, they were eventual equals as far as how they're viewed today. Both had great ensemble casts. That remake-of-a-remake (a pseudo-prequel, actually) that was done about ten years ago was a stinkbomb.
33 posted on 08/21/2020 1:15:45 PM PDT by Viking2002 ("If a really stupid person becomes senile......how can you tell?" - George Carlin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]


To: Viking2002

I never saw the latest remake, but Carpenter’s Thing was great.
It and the original are both great, though very different.


42 posted on 08/21/2020 5:30:50 PM PDT by gymbeau (I refuse to be anonymous. I am THEnonymous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson