Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Conservative Justice Ruled with Liberals Not To Hear Maryland High School vs Caleigh Wood case?
Freerepublic ^ | OV

Posted on 10/26/2019 4:56:33 PM PDT by OneVike

Vanity, Vanity, Vanity, but inquiring minds need to know. Which of the 4 conservative justices voted not to hear the case involving the issue of Maryland High School student Caleigh Wood, who refused to take part in a school assignment to write the Islamic conversion prayer.

My guess it was Roberts, but you never know, and regardless of how I try I cannot find out which Justice it was.

Anyone know which Supreme Court justice, or more, decided to vote with the Godless liberals not to hear the case?


TOPICS: Religion
KEYWORDS: education; highschool; justice; maryland; muslim; prayer; scotus; supremcourt; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last
To: scrabblehack

Since it wasn’t an emergency, there probably weren’t four justices who wanted to hear the case, unfortunately.

One justice can’t overrule the rest of the Court.


21 posted on 10/26/2019 5:43:12 PM PDT by MitchRegal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
If the student is still incarcerated in the same government asylum, I'd be inclined to charge the parents with child abuse...

Ultimately they chose this 12-year sentence for their offspring... They have no standing for complaint...

22 posted on 10/26/2019 5:52:06 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

How can the Constitution be possibly interpreted as allowing the coercion of a student to recite a religious oath of a religion she is not bound to.


23 posted on 10/26/2019 5:54:17 PM PDT by Jonty30 (What Islam and secularism have in common is that they are both death by cultsther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SuperLuminal

Agree with you in principle.

Now allow those who opt out to have their tax contribution returned...


24 posted on 10/26/2019 6:04:48 PM PDT by SecAmndmt (Arm yourselves!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Jonty30

‘That’ is the problem!

The Constitution isn’t about Giving Rights to the People!
(Those are God Given)

The Constitution is about the Peoples control over the government!


25 posted on 10/26/2019 6:05:08 PM PDT by justme4now (Falsehood flies, and the Truth comes limping after it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Farcesensitive

4 out of 9 said no. We do have 4 libs. Not sure why you are blaming Roberts without a shred of evidence or even the slightest understanding of the procedures to this case.


26 posted on 10/26/2019 6:14:13 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MitchRegal

Good grief. It takes 4 to NOT take the case. RBG, Byers, sodamyor, kagen. That’s it!!!!!! No conservatives necessary at all.


27 posted on 10/26/2019 6:17:06 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Squishy? And what Supreme Court cases do you prove that with? He’s gone with majority since on the court. Why did you fight so hard for him if you despise him so much?


28 posted on 10/26/2019 6:19:14 PM PDT by napscoordinator (Trump/Hunter, jr for President/Vice President 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

From post #8:

The Supreme Court decides to hear a case based on at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agreeing to grant the Petition for Certiorari. If four Justices agree to grant the petition, the Supreme Court will consider the case. A Petition for Certiorari is granted in very, few selected cases—fewer than 100 a year, by the Supreme Court of the United States.

A petition for Writ Certiorari is a request that the court hear your case. The Supreme Court receives over 5000 writs of Certiorari every year. Each writ and the case it comes from is reviewed the Supreme Court clerks and then shortened into a cert. memo. The cert. memo is what the Supreme Court justices use to actually decide the case. Upon reviewing the memo, the particular justice that the case was assigned to will either deny the appeal himself and affirm the appeals court judgment or will bring the cert. memo before the other justices and debate whether the case should be heard. In order for the case to be heard, four justices must agree to hear the case. This is known as the Rule of Four. If four justices vote to hear the case, then it is placed onto the court’s docket and the parties and their attorney’s are notified that the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.

The court will typically grant the petitions of cases that are exceptionally unique and that present an issue of law that would be considered far-reaching throughout the United States. The Supreme Court also prefers cases that are clear examples for the lower court so that exact guidance can be given.

Read more: ///law.freeadvice.com/litigation/appeals/supreme_court_case_hearing.htm#ixzz63VZiB63W


It takes either 6 Justices or the Justice in charge of the Circuit to deny a petition.

That means we either have two traitors or Roberts is the traitor because the case came from his circuit.


29 posted on 10/26/2019 6:24:28 PM PDT by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SecAmndmt
"Now allow those who opt out to have their tax contribution returned..."

Agree... To get there would need the percentage of "home" home-schooled + "online" home-schooled + private school schooled + church schooled students to get close to 50%... Then there could be the voting power to do just that... Around here it must be getting close... Of the dozens of churches within 10-miles of me, there is only 3 that don't have a K-8 or K-12 operation...

30 posted on 10/26/2019 6:26:40 PM PDT by SuperLuminal (Where is Sam Adams now that we desperately need him)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

I don’t despise him.
He has an affinity for precedence.
Precedent that is often wrong.


31 posted on 10/26/2019 6:30:21 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

You have it wrong.
Four must vote to take the case.
We did not get four votes.


32 posted on 10/26/2019 6:32:19 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Did they explain denial of the case? Often there are stated reasons.


33 posted on 10/26/2019 6:34:42 PM PDT by lurk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

It takes six not to take the case. Your math is off.


34 posted on 10/26/2019 6:37:26 PM PDT by MitchRegal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Roberts and Kavanaugh.


That’d be my guess, too. There is no way the GOPe would have shepherded Kavanaugh if they thought he was a solid MAGA nominee.


35 posted on 10/26/2019 7:01:08 PM PDT by lodi90
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Bump


36 posted on 10/26/2019 7:14:48 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MitchRegal

The cert. memo is what the Supreme Court justices use to actually decide the case. Upon reviewing the memo, the particular justice that the case was assigned to will either deny the appeal himself and affirm the appeals court judgment or will bring the cert. memo before the other justices and debate whether the case should be heard.


So the particular justice reviewing the case (I assume this is the one in charge of the circuit) has 3 choices:
1. deny the appeal (but then you say one justice can’t do this on his own)
2. affirm the appeals court judgment (I’m not sure what the difference is here - it would seem that affirming the appeals court judgment is denying the appeal)
3. bring the memo to the other justices (so if 3 others want to hear the case, it gets on the docket).


37 posted on 10/26/2019 9:24:00 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: scrabblehack

Actually that is the full description, and what it says is thea the emo for the case is assigned to 1 justice, who may deny it be themselves. If not he passes it to all justices and then it requires only 4 vote yes to hear the case. So it could have been assigned to a liberal justice and they decided on their own to dent taking the case.


38 posted on 10/26/2019 9:32:30 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong

As I understand it, the case is usually assigned to the justice in charge of the circuit.

https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/circuitAssignments.aspx

Roberts has the 4th Circuit (wherein Maryland is)


39 posted on 10/26/2019 9:42:17 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: MitchRegal
There are five conservatives on the Court, counting Roberts.

Sod off, Swampy.

40 posted on 10/26/2019 10:04:48 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change with out notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson