Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Conservative Justice Ruled with Liberals Not To Hear Maryland High School vs Caleigh Wood case?
Freerepublic ^ | OV

Posted on 10/26/2019 4:56:33 PM PDT by OneVike

Vanity, Vanity, Vanity, but inquiring minds need to know. Which of the 4 conservative justices voted not to hear the case involving the issue of Maryland High School student Caleigh Wood, who refused to take part in a school assignment to write the Islamic conversion prayer.

My guess it was Roberts, but you never know, and regardless of how I try I cannot find out which Justice it was.

Anyone know which Supreme Court justice, or more, decided to vote with the Godless liberals not to hear the case?


TOPICS: Religion
KEYWORDS: education; highschool; justice; maryland; muslim; prayer; scotus; supremcourt; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

1 posted on 10/26/2019 4:56:33 PM PDT by OneVike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I need to run to the store for my wife, but I will join the conversation when I return.


2 posted on 10/26/2019 4:57:50 PM PDT by OneVike (Just another Christian waiting to go home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Roberts is the even money bet.


3 posted on 10/26/2019 5:00:26 PM PDT by ealgeone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I figure your right but Robert’s is a Bushie and no conservative.


4 posted on 10/26/2019 5:00:35 PM PDT by Equine1952 (Get yourself a ticket on a common mans train of thought))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I need to take a shower but will respond later.


5 posted on 10/26/2019 5:01:02 PM PDT by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

The shower.

You’re supposed to get into the shower.


6 posted on 10/26/2019 5:05:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin (The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire. Or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ealgeone
The words “Conservative” and “Justice Roberts” should never be mentioned in the same sentence.Appropriate synonyms for Roberts are traitor, judas, back stabber.
7 posted on 10/26/2019 5:05:45 PM PDT by sport
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

The Supreme Court decides to hear a case based on at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agreeing to grant the Petition for Certiorari. If four Justices agree to grant the petition, the Supreme Court will consider the case. A Petition for Certiorari is granted in very, few selected cases—fewer than 100 a year, by the Supreme Court of the United States.

A petition for Writ Certiorari is a request that the court hear your case. The Supreme Court receives over 5000 writs of Certiorari every year. Each writ and the case it comes from is reviewed the Supreme Court clerks and then shortened into a cert. memo. The cert. memo is what the Supreme Court justices use to actually decide the case. Upon reviewing the memo, the particular justice that the case was assigned to will either deny the appeal himself and affirm the appeals court judgment or will bring the cert. memo before the other justices and debate whether the case should be heard. In order for the case to be heard, four justices must agree to hear the case. This is known as the Rule of Four. If four justices vote to hear the case, then it is placed onto the court’s docket and the parties and their attorney’s are notified that the Supreme Court agrees to hear the case.

The court will typically grant the petitions of cases that are exceptionally unique and that present an issue of law that would be considered far-reaching throughout the United States. The Supreme Court also prefers cases that are clear examples for the lower court so that exact guidance can be given.

Read more: ///law.freeadvice.com/litigation/appeals/supreme_court_case_hearing.htm#ixzz63VZiB63W


8 posted on 10/26/2019 5:07:10 PM PDT by MitchRegal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

There are five conservatives on the Court, counting Roberts.

It would take two conservatives to refuse the case, not just one.


9 posted on 10/26/2019 5:12:02 PM PDT by MitchRegal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

There are five conservatives on the Court, counting Roberts.

It would take two conservatives to refuse the case, not just one.


10 posted on 10/26/2019 5:12:03 PM PDT by MitchRegal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
I too cannot find the answer you seek, however, all 3 that voted against Wood in the appeals court were appointed by Barack Obama. Judges: Barbara Milano Keenan, Pamela Harris, & James A. Wynn Jr.

But it had to be more than one "conservative" justice who voted not to hear the case. I say this because of this that I found:

The Supreme Court decides to hear a case based on at least four of the nine Justices of the Supreme Court agreeing to grant the Petition for Certiorari. If four Justices agree to grant the petition, the Supreme Court will consider the case. ... A petition for Writ Certiorari is a request that the court hear your case.

11 posted on 10/26/2019 5:13:56 PM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike
SCOTUS votes to grant cert are not made public.

At the link, the LA Times objects to that.

https://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-1008-segall-scotus-anonymous-certiorari-20141007-story.html

When the Supreme Court votes on whether to grant a writ of certiorari, it doesn’t reveal which justices voted in favor of or against hearing the case (unless a justice writes a dissent, which is highly unusual). This secrecy is totally unnecessary and inconsistent with democratic aspirations of public transparency and open government.

12 posted on 10/26/2019 5:15:36 PM PDT by TChad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Is there a formal vote taken, when the SCOTUS declines to hear a case, or is it just the chief justice who polls the associate justices, to see if there is a quorum to take up the case; and if not issues a notice the court won’t hear/challenge the case?


13 posted on 10/26/2019 5:16:05 PM PDT by Wuli
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Robert DeLong; OneVike; MitchRegal

Post 8 makes it sound as though one justice can sink your
case. This is likely the justice who is in charge of your circuit. Maryland is in the 4th circuit. Roberts is in charge of that one.

Now if it gets past that stage then it takes 4 votes?


14 posted on 10/26/2019 5:28:09 PM PDT by scrabblehack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Once again, Christianity is still criminalized and can not even be mentioned in any public setting while Islam is elevated and taught in public schools.

JoMa


15 posted on 10/26/2019 5:28:32 PM PDT by joma89
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

I’d guess it was Roberts.

He’s not a real conservative.


16 posted on 10/26/2019 5:30:40 PM PDT by Farcesensitive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OneVike

Good grief.
Would have been ‘professional’ to offer another assignment to the student- but no big deal.
Lots of religions in the world for students to learn something of.


17 posted on 10/26/2019 5:32:32 PM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Farcesensitive

Obama/MB etc. has Robert’s puppet strings firmly in hand.

Muslim money is doing great damage to our country.


18 posted on 10/26/2019 5:34:55 PM PDT by Aria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MitchRegal

Three conservatives, two squishes.
Roberts and Kavanaugh.


19 posted on 10/26/2019 5:41:32 PM PDT by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents_Know Islam, No Peace-No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: MitchRegal

Roberts is the Mitt Romney of the Supreme court. Just like Trump says......”how come the democraps never have guys like this?”


20 posted on 10/26/2019 5:41:35 PM PDT by inchworm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-48 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson