Posted on 01/23/2018 4:38:56 AM PST by MNDude
What would happen if texts originating from a FBI agent to several [internals] discussed the assassination (possibility) of the POTUS or member of his family? What if the texts suggest foreign allies were involved? Forget the Russia set up [1 of 22]. This is only the beginning. Be careful what you wish for. AS THE WORLD TURNS. Could messages such as those be publicly disclosed? What happens to the FBI? What happens to the DOJ? What happens to special counsel? What happens in general? Every FBI/DOJ prev case could be challenged. Lawless. Think logically. We haven’t started the drops re: human trafficking / sacrifices [yet][worst]. Those [good] who know cannot sleep. Those [good] who know cannot find peace. Those [good] who know will not rest until those responsible are held accountable. Nobody can possibly imagine the pure evil and corruption out there.
It’s amazing the amount of dis-information the trolls are throwing at us. It’s not working. My first response is that they are incredibly uninformed. For being FReepers, that’s inexcusable, since this information has been discussed here for years. Q is just, in his/her/their round-about way, confirming to us everything we’ve thought was true. Example: AS 187. That was discussed here at the time and everyone came to that conclusion. It would be nice to ignore the trolls, but they are so disruptive, and refuse to exercise even one little grey cell.
Who is Steve? The quote in my comment is from the owner of this site.
And you have a problem because I don’t wet my pants over Q posts. Funny!
Who needs evidence when one can sprinkle SEKRIT code gibberish into a drama queen blog post posing as insider knowledge?
Thank you.
.
You do nothing but wet your pants. That’s the problem.
Stay off of threads that you don’t understand.
.
Who was responding to “steve.”
.
.
When”Q” posts something, and a few minutes later president Trump affirms it in a tweet, do you suppose that someone is lacking “insider knowledge?”
Or are you just not willing to pay enough attention?
.
See post #204. That sums this Q stuff very well.
.
You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about, and quite possibvly lack the cognition to understand the cryptic posts of Q.
Get back on the porch; you’ll get lost if you try to follow the big dogs.
.
We have always given links to up and coming conservative thinkers and writers. World Net Daily got their initial readership from FR back in 1998, 2001 and 2002.
Drudge, Black Sheep News, and tons of others were linked in threads.
Hell at one point we belonged to what was the Conservative Ring.
bfl
..maybe I’ve missed something. I thought the ONLY place Q was posting to was greatawakening over on 8 Chan and every thing else was suspect...
Yes, now that I've been looking at this I agree. Q's cryptic postings are followed by many people researching publicly available information, that otherwise is overlooked or forgotten, to solve the postings' meanings. That is a good thing.
You totally missed the point of my post (That’s OK it’s a mistake many n00bs make :) )
So for those readers in Rio Linda.......
Don’t be insulting people just because they ask a question. There are always people who have been here longer and everyone but Jim R is a n00b to someone.
If a simple question offends or threatens you, then examine your self and the beliefs you hold. Else it costs nothing to just answer the question.
Just responding to the original post with “As of yet none of us have seen, and are not able to see, what is cooking regarding this treachery.
We all want the truth out and heads to roll. Patience”
would have been sufficient.
Excellent. If you do not believe it is a conspiracy theory then present proof. Or simply answer the question as dforest did in post 175.
Until proof one way or another can be presented it IS a conspiracy theory. That is not judging it as true or false, it is just recognizing that it is unproven as of this point.
My point is that there is no reason to be insulting anyone over simply asking a question. Everyone here except Jim R is a n00b to someone.
You call the original poster (of this line of discussion) a troll and yet you present no proof that he is or that he isn’t. It’s kind of the liberal “accuse them of anything until something sticks” line of reasoning. That is unnecessary. Just discuss the issues.
Seems to me he just asked a simple question. How can a question be a distraction in the search for truth?
Aug 1 2017 signup date is a n00b
to everyone, *and* suspicious for someone acting to defend the Deep State by posting FUD.
.
A question that hinges on a false premise is a technique to derail meaningful discussion by confusion.
.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.