Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

This battery breakthrough could change the world
GearBurn ^ | July 12, 2016 | By Wiehahn Diederichs

Posted on 07/12/2016 6:07:12 PM PDT by Swordmaker


Well it seems the battery gods have heard our call and bestowed upon us a miracle.

Researchers at the University of California Irvine (UCI) may have discovered a way to drastically increase the life of modern day batteries. And the best part is that they stumbled upon this solution by accident.

To be more specific, the discovery was made by fifth-year PhD student, Mya Le Thai. Mya was working on an electrolyte gel that was to substitute the electrolyte liquid currently found in batteries in an attempt to make it more affordable. But in a coincidental twist of fate (thank you battery gods), her solution also happened to significantly extend the lifespan of a battery.

Up until now, the most promising venture into the evolution of battery technology had come in the form of nanowire filaments, wires comprised of various materials that are thousands of times thinner than a human hair.

For a long time now, scientists have aimed to replace the graphite anode currently used in lithium batteries with these nanowire filaments. These nanowires are considerably more powerful, have the ability to store greater amounts of energy and retain that energy for a much longer time period.

But if nanowires are such a great alternative to lithium batteries, why does the world still predominantly use the latter? Well, the problem with nanowires is that they are extremely fragile and tend to break when repeatedly charged. It’s not hard to see why electronic manufacturers would rather stick with the less resilient yet more reliable lithium batteries.

This is where Mya Le Thai’s magic gel comes in. Typically, a Lithium Ion battery can go through between 5000 and 7000 recharge cycles before it dies and will also gradually lose its energy storage capacity over time. When researchers applied Thai’s plexiglass-like gel to gold nanowires in a manganese dioxiode shell, it increased that number to over 200,000 and the battery didn’t lose any of its power or storage capacity over a period of three months.

This is a colossal difference, which could lead to multiple positive implications in our daily lives. Smartphones, laptops, battery cars, wireless remotes, digital cameras… pretty much anything that isn’t connected to a power socket requires a battery. With this innovation all these items will be powered, and remain powered, for a much, much longer time.

I’m sure my tiny mind is only scratching the surface of this great discovery and the extent of its real-world applications. But I’m pretty sure that over the next few years we will probably realise just how dependent on batteries we are and how significant this discovery actually is.

It will most probably be quite some time before we see this discovery in commercial action, though. For now, all we can do now is wait. Like most scientific discoveries, there is always more testing to be done and lab rats to torment.

“For this research right now the plan is to understand the mechanisms of how this gel electrolyte could prolong the cyclibility so well,” Thai said. “The future bigger plan would be to optimize these gel electrolytes to see if it can improve even more.”

Don’t take too long, Ms. Thai. I’m sure most of us are waiting in intense anticipation.

Those of you who are more scientifically-inclined can read a detailed report of the research titled “100k Cycles and Beyond: Extraordinary Cycle Stability for MnO2 Nanowires Impacted by a Gel Electrolyte”, published in the American Chemical Society’s publication, Energy Letters.

Feature image: Steve Zylius via UCI


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Computers/Internet; Science
KEYWORDS: again; andagain; applepinglist; batteries; battery; decades; magicbattery; technology; windowspinglist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
To: Swordmaker

Another day, another astonishing battery breakthrough.


61 posted on 07/12/2016 8:20:31 PM PDT by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

The Engineer here waited 60 posts for the relevant point.

The important point has not been stated yet. I am grateful to my inner Engineer that simplifies solutions since relevance is so obscure.

Go to the front of the class if someone can state the relevant idea. I will give a hint, it is a negative.


62 posted on 07/12/2016 8:25:22 PM PDT by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

I wish I had a dollar for every time I’ve seen an article about a battery breakthrough that never made it to market. I’d be a millionaire.


63 posted on 07/12/2016 8:28:10 PM PDT by Moonman62 (Make America Great Again!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

I didn’t want to touch that one with a 10 foot pole.


64 posted on 07/12/2016 8:38:45 PM PDT by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

Whoever finds the answer first wins. So here is another hint, and maybe giveaway.

List three properties of a battery, rank their importance, then state if this discovery is a breakthrough or a dud.

a) duration it holds initial charge eg 3 months
b) battery life eg 200k cycles
c) ???

Breakthrough or a Dud?

Determine property c) for the answer.


65 posted on 07/12/2016 8:39:26 PM PDT by TheNext (Hillary Hurts Children & Women)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Bobalu
Not quite the way it happened according to the biochemists on "In Our Time with Melvyn Bragg - Penicillin." Close, but no mention of a cantaloupe. There isn't any agreement on where the mold spores came from.

WARNING: Clicking the above link will download the podcast to your machine. It's a great podcast.

66 posted on 07/12/2016 8:46:11 PM PDT by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

Energy density.


67 posted on 07/12/2016 8:46:38 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

‘Tthank you battery gods.’ Wimp. Just be honest and real and say: Thank you, God the Father, for the wonders of creation. New discoveries show Your splendor.


68 posted on 07/12/2016 8:49:55 PM PDT by Falconspeed ("Keep your fears to yourself, but share your courage with others." Robert Louis Stevenson (1850-94))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
But they didn't actually discover it by accident.

They were looking for something and found it. Then they found it had a nice side effect.

69 posted on 07/12/2016 8:53:15 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (Proud Infidel, Gun Nut, Religious Fanatic and Freedom Fiend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

anyone else using envelop batteries?


70 posted on 07/12/2016 8:54:01 PM PDT by KC Burke (Consider all of my posts as first drafts. (Apologies to L. Niven))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

Great news...


71 posted on 07/12/2016 9:12:33 PM PDT by GOPJ ("Crooked Hillary has the violent thug vote" - - Freeper Reeses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: familyop

My go to is the dry cell with the screw terminals on top.

Now THATS a battery!


72 posted on 07/12/2016 9:19:52 PM PDT by Rome2000 (SMASH THE CPUSA-SIC SEMPER TYRANNIS-CLOSE ALL MOSQUES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle

Many great dicoveries are accidental. Plastic was created by accident. X-rays were discovered by accident, along with gunpowder, antibiotics (penicillin) and nuclear fission. The list goes on and on.


73 posted on 07/12/2016 9:40:25 PM PDT by Crucial
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Balding_Eagle
Top DNC Staffer Murdered In Washington DC

Sorry, but most inventions have been discovered by mistake. The telephone comes to mind for one.
74 posted on 07/12/2016 9:53:45 PM PDT by OneVike (I'm just a Christian waiting for a ride home)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Blood of Tyrants

That’s the key question. I still like my Dollar Tree 8-pack of batteries for one dollar. They don’t last as long as the Energizer, but lots of portable devices they work just fine. And you’re spending $12.00 a year on batteries, not $50.00


75 posted on 07/12/2016 10:07:00 PM PDT by poconopundit (When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheNext

Property c is cost — or manufacturability. There was no discussion of cost in the story.


76 posted on 07/12/2016 10:15:39 PM PDT by poconopundit (When the people shall become so corrupted as to need despotic government. Franklin, Const. Conv.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Swordmaker

There they are again...those pesky little weasel words “may have”.


77 posted on 07/13/2016 12:18:29 AM PDT by Fresh Wind (Hey now baby, get into my big black car, I just want to show you what my politics are.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
The side effect is that this will distrupt Apple’s business model, because they time their product announcements to match their battery lifetime.

Uh, nope. My original iPhone, purchased on June 27, 2007, is still operational, and still holding a charge, being used as an iPod touch by my 4 ½ year old grand daughter with the original battery still in it. That phone was handed down through various family members and finally retired from cell phone use a year or so ago. At that time it held 80% of its original daily charge time. Nice try. If what you claim were true, Apple mobile devices wouldn't be commanding the high resale prices they do, even three, four, and five years post introduction.

78 posted on 07/13/2016 2:17:43 AM PDT by Swordmaker (This tag line is a Microsoft insult free zone... but if the insults to Mac users continue..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: sparklite2

And another genius was discovered!!! Interesting story, I did not know that. Thanks.


79 posted on 07/13/2016 5:27:18 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: tubebender

Stiff competition


80 posted on 07/13/2016 6:40:21 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Democrats bait then switch; their fishy voters buy it every time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson