Posted on 12/14/2013 7:18:01 AM PST by rickmichaels
The small town of Superior, Wisconsin may emerge as an unlikely American maritime hub for Canadian crude if plans to transport Alberta oil sands oil across the Great Lakes come to pass.
There are many hurdles to cross. The first is a proposal to repair a shipping dock on Lake Superior that would set the stage for the construction of an oil terminal feeding refineries in and around the Great Lakes.
Superior-based Elkhorn Industries has applied for a permit to reconstruct 700 feet of dockwall with the Wisconsin Natural Resources Department, and the move has pricked the ears of those who believe it is the first step towards mass transportation of Canadian crude across the lakes that separate Ontario and several U.S. states.
(Excerpt) Read more at business.financialpost.com ...
Thanks rickmichaels.
I have no problem with them shipping crude on the salt-water oceans, but the fresh-water Great Lakes is another issue. Still prefer pipelines.
Interesting news. The biggest constraint is the lock systems throughout the Great Lakes. Under the political pressure from the North American railroad industry, they were never built to accommodate ships that are commonly used in international shipping today. Crude oil from the center of North America must be trading at a huge discount in order to make up for these major inefficiencies in transportation costs.
Real plan or just a case of grabbing a hostage and shouting “Give us the pipeline or the lake gets it”?
Excellent Observations about the locks at the Welland Canal and Sault Saint Marie, Michigan. There is one further problem. Depth of the lakes and channels. Ships using the Great Lakes whether lake ore boats carrying iron ore or other bulk products and ocean going ships can load to a draft of about 25 feet. About half the draft for ships that call on ocean ports.
It would explain why Karl Lenin and Debbie Stupid cow have suddenly become interested in the pipeline under the straits.
vs hauling it halfway around the world?
We’re protective of our lakes. However the state and feds have a responsibility to ease the flow while encouraging safety.
People are still squealing about the Embridge spill but few mention the fact that the state hadn’t been doing the required inspections for years. Oil producers have to pay for state and federal inspectors in which case the states and feds have a bad habit of collecting the money and doing nothing.
Its kind of like the $20 billion we’ve paid the DOE to dispose of nuclear waste but they haven’t moved an ounce.
Sounds OK to me until...
the winds of November come early.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vST6hVRj2A
BP’s Whiting refinery is just finishing their modernization project, originally called Operation Canadian Crude. For the past few years, it was the largest construction project going in the US. Whiting refinery is in northern Indiana, ON the shores at the southern end of Lake Michigan. It is the fourth largest refinery in the US.
Another development mostly overlooked in the Great lakes trade is the effective gutting of the Jones Act by the Canadian National Railroad.
CN bought US Steel’s Great lakes Fleet (eight or nine ore carriers) and now operates them out of Duluth.
the great lakes have locks?
The links do not work for me.
Duluth-Superior is already one of the nation’s biggest ports and the area population is 300,000. Not really the sleepy small town indicated.
They used to have to get up a big head of steam and jump Niagara Falls.
Alberta oil sands oil via the Great Lakes
FReep Mail me if you want on, or off, this Wisconsin interest ping list.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.