Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just Spoke W/ Very Senior Ret. USAF Officer. Says USAF, NORAD, Etc. Have "No Clue" About Missile.
Friends and Fiends | Friends and Fiends

Posted on 11/09/2010 2:03:14 PM PST by MindBender26

Just spoke with old friend, very senior retired USAF general officer/pilot. Says his contacts, many of whom were his "boys," have no idea what Pacific missile is/was

As I was calling him, he was calling me to run my old network traps to see if anyone at the network desks in NY or DC have any idea what this was!

Data from video seems to be that it was large, ballistic, (not cruise) sub-launched. Course seemed to be trans-polar, so could have impacted in Arctic, Russian Far East, China, etc.

Current guesses... and these are wild guesses (some from the O Club at his lunch)

1: Crazy Russian or Chinese sub captain. No explosion because they didn't want one, or captain did not have correct codes for the PAL.

2: Islamic.......... ????? Demonstration?????

3: Hoax... but that seems way to far fetched.

Navy is also supposedly bat sh*t over this because there was no acoustic detection of sub!

NORAD scratching head ????

There may be an explanation, but no one knows what it was... or is!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: as225; californiamissile; chat; contrail; missilemystery; mysteryflight; mysteryjet; mysterymissile; mysterymissle; unsourced; unverifiable; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-347 next last
To: lacrew
I’d say Mr. Putin is just showing off. Get a sub within 35 miles of LA,and fire off a missile to prove it (kind of like the acoustic device on SPUTNIK to prove it was there).

The Russians want the new START treaty ratified. If they did this they can wave bye-bye to that.
161 posted on 11/09/2010 4:22:41 PM PST by Cheburashka (Democratic Underground - the Hogwarts of Stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Every large rocket hobbyist files a flight plan in advance and informs the rocketry community months before their launch schedule.

It was 35 miles off of the coast, longer flight time than any amateur rocket, no flight plan filed, and as far as the amateur rocket community is concerned it wasn’t theirs.

To everyone saying it is a jet, you can see a large single orange flame shooting from bottom of the object producing the contrail. Also, the contrail is super large when scaled against the helicopter in flight (good reference point), which is several miles closer to the camera. The bottom plume appears to be at least a mile wide.


162 posted on 11/09/2010 4:23:41 PM PST by BushCountry (I spoken many wise words in jest, but no comparison to the number of stupid words spoken in earnest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 159 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Oh how cool is this!

I just clicked the TV listing

Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

Is on tonight. 7pm on TCM. Me and my precious bodily fluids are gonna watch that.

Yeeeee haaaawwwwww!


163 posted on 11/09/2010 4:29:51 PM PST by Responsibility2nd (Yes, as a matter of fact, what you do in your bedroom IS my business.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry
Absolutely not an aircraft or hobby rocket. I have no real idea but my gut guess is that it would take at least $100 million dollars to build and launch something that big from scratch. That would be with the most amazing budget managers in the history of bean counting. No one could buy the parts and fuel for it and not be detected either. Even in a foreign country.

If FR mil, ex-mil and engineering FReepers disagree I'll gladly accept their greater knowledge and experience on the matter.

164 posted on 11/09/2010 4:34:31 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: oh8eleven; Darksheare
It passed spell check and as I hit the Post button I saw it and knew I’d end up “red faced.”

LOL. Over on the Undead Thread we'd just call it a "typso" and a sure sign that FReeper darksheare was lurking.

165 posted on 11/09/2010 4:34:52 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Norad says it ain't a foreign missile or threat:
The North American Aerospace Defense Command, or NORAD, issued a statement jointly with the U.S. Northern Command, or NORTHCOM, saying that the contrail was not the result of a foreign military launching a missile. It provided no further details.

"We can confirm that there is no threat to our nation, and from all indications this was not a launch by a foreign military," the statement said.

My money is on a contrail, the source for info was posted earlier on this thread. I'll repost my synopsis in favor of contrail.

Missile launch:

Jet contrail off CA coast last year (Mistaken for missile at the time.):


This event:


166 posted on 11/09/2010 4:38:58 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd
Dr. Strangelove Or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb

We have the DVD. Along with "Failsafe." Those times should not be forgotten.

167 posted on 11/09/2010 4:39:14 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar; oh8eleven

I was lurking, drifting through the forum while reading the bad movie website Agony Booth.
Weird how that works.


168 posted on 11/09/2010 4:45:32 PM PST by Darksheare (I shook hands with Sheryl Crow and all I got was Typhus and a single sheet of toilet paper.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 165 | View Replies]

To: hc87; GOPJ
Did you know the word “gullible” isn’t in the dictionary?

Yes it is! It says, "a furasda an car a thoirt á" (very roughly, "easy to twist him")

(The dictionary is "The New English-Gaelic Dictionary," BTW. Look it up.)

169 posted on 11/09/2010 4:48:04 PM PST by sionnsar (IranAzadi|5yst3m 0wn3d-it's N0t Y0ur5:SONY|TV--it's NOT news you can trust)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

You captured the wrong frame. Do a capture of a closeup that shows a bright orange light ahead of the smoke. Jets do not shoot fire without their after burners engaged. Also, if it was a jet why don’t they know from flight plans and time?

It doesn’t make any sense.


170 posted on 11/09/2010 4:53:38 PM PST by BushCountry (I spoken many wise words in jest, but no comparison to the number of stupid words spoken in earnest)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr

I think we can all agree that video from yesterday shows a vehicle moving from east to west away from the CA coast. If it was an aircraft leaving a contrail how is it that the first part of the contrail appears to originate in the west on the horizon? Wouldn’t the contrail of an aircraft leaving the CONUS originate over land to the east of the coast?


171 posted on 11/09/2010 5:03:15 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 166 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

One theory: Earthbound asteroid headed for western hemisphere... missile launched in hopes of deflecting/obliterating before impact... Just a theory...


172 posted on 11/09/2010 5:18:47 PM PST by visioneer2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

Drug cartels ub a kevlar coated sub?


173 posted on 11/09/2010 5:21:45 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoSixChip

I think the Chinese may have good reason to demonstrate an undectable launch platform.

If it was a sub, its long gone. The Chinese have been playing with the Japan Defence Forces in the same way, they are really stealthy, running up to the 20 mile coastal limit.They have not launched though.

I looked at the CBS video.It was definitely a rocket, the contrail was so thick it indicates that the fuel oxidizer was on board the craft, it was not an air/fuel mix engine.

Also possible it was a USN unauthorized/accidental launch.


174 posted on 11/09/2010 5:23:50 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_the_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BushCountry

Here’s the video that has the most close up (enlarged) view that I’ve found:

http://www.necn.com/11/09/10/Mysterious-missile-launched-off-Californ/landing_scitech.html?blockID=348833&feedID=4213

I don’t see fire at all.

Here’s the flight path of one jet that’s been offered as a possibility as far as direction and time:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/AWE808/history/20101108/1955Z/PHNL/KPHX


175 posted on 11/09/2010 5:27:57 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26
Wow! - that is quite a submarine. I hope during the time of lease the US was able to develop better sensing capability.
176 posted on 11/09/2010 5:30:01 PM PST by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-Qaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 146 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Any direction would be apparent direction. If it is a jet contrail, it’s apparent motion would be mostly vertical, it’s actual path would be mostly horizontal to the earth’s surface.

Here’s the flight path of one jet that’s been offered as a possibility as far as direction and time:

http://flightaware.com/live/flight/AWE808/history/20101108/1955Z/PHNL/KPHX

Here’s a link to the vectors/physics of it:

http://uncinus.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/4/


177 posted on 11/09/2010 5:30:52 PM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 171 | View Replies]

To: MindBender26

It’s a common contrail. The object is traveling toward you, not away from you, and since the contrail has a long persistence, it looks like it emanates from the horizon, thus the illusion that it is a missile traveling away from you.


178 posted on 11/09/2010 5:33:37 PM PST by Banjoguy (Barack H. Obama, the Democrats and the MSM are at war with the American people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Candor7; bvw
"My guess is a missile with a leak that had to be launched."

bvw posted this. It is one of the most interesting speculations I have seen. It fits in several ways. It accounts for a very big missile. It accounts for a completely unexpected launch and it very well might be considered too embarrassing to tell the truth about. It would also explain the contradiction between saying no one knows anything about it yet confidently state there is no threat.

179 posted on 11/09/2010 5:33:49 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 174 | View Replies]

To: D-fendr
If it is a jet contrail, it’s apparent motion would be mostly vertical, ...

Until it passed overhead.

180 posted on 11/09/2010 5:35:09 PM PST by TigersEye (Who crashed the markets on 9/28/08 and why?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 341-347 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson