Posted on 09/04/2009 7:20:05 PM PDT by Man50D
As of today, September 4, 2009, this Affidavit has been filed with the United States District Court in Southern California ~ represented by Orly Taitz.
This is a legal affidavit that declares Lucas Smith to be of sound mind and judgement. Lucas can go to jail if he lied on this affidavit.
The document (Certified COPY of Obama Kenyan Birth Certificate) you see here, once it is validated by the court, is pretty much the proverbial smoking gun.
(Excerpt) Read more at americangrandjury.org ...
7 pounds 1 ounce = 3.2 kilograms or one half stone
Including the troublesome placement of the dates, I also see nothing British style in the information, but birth information in the US is usually supplied by the mother to the doctor and Obamas mother was from Kansas.
Nothing odd here in reporting weight and height in pounds and inches. THAT is the English, "un-Frenchified" pre-decimal system.
They still traded in six-pence and florins in 1961.
Here’s how I see it. Lucas Smith has placed his evidence before the court under the penalty of perjury. Will the frauds at Factcheck be willing to do the same??? I doubt it.
From this website in a thread called "American vs British style of writing dates":
http://www.antimoon.com/forum/t1952-45.htm
David Thu Jan 11, 2007 9:32 pm GMT
What a stupid discussion:
Fact is:
Both day-month-year and month-day-year are used in Britain. And the month-day-year version is even preferred by British newspapers:
Let's see:
The Times: February 17, 2005
Guardian: Feburary 17, 2005
Economist: February 17th 2005
And there are also influential American publications (especially academic publications) that use day-month-year, for example:
Science Magazine: 17 February 2005
Physical Review Letters: 17 February 2005
****
and from Saturday's Times of London, check out the date, September 5, 2009:
.
Agreed....Helton Maganga appears to be real. My question is why not get Helton to sign an affidavit ? It would sure carry a lot more weight than an ex-con. Maganga’s signature
appears ‘very’ neat. Almost like it could be a woman. Does anyone know Helton’s gender ? Also, would a Hospital Chief Administrator stamp and sign a document without reading it first ? If this document was sealed as Smith stated, wouldn’t the Chief Administrator be aware of this ? This should be an easy debunk or verification once someone contacts Maganga. BTW, I hope it’s real, just raising a few concerns.
When using all numbers, written, you’ll never see anything other than dd/mm/yy or dd/mm/yyyy in common use.
Will the Judge find for the plaintive, and give all uniformed personnel the option to refuse orders?
Nobody knows what’s fake and what’s not.
Many of us have two authentic BCs, the unofficial one with footprints that the hospital issues, and the official one that is recorded with the government. The one Smith has would be the hospital copy; the one attorney Orly has is supposedly the governmental one.
I’ve followed all these threads and the detailed examination of purported BCs. Some are quickly dismissed as forgeries. From all I’ve seen, the jury is still out on both of these.
(I wish that last sentence were not a figure of speech.)
Who knows?
I noticed that too. It's actually way too neat for a man's signature.
Another thing is the dates. They're done American style, as in, MM/DD/YY. British style is DD/MM/YY. This little detail is a glaring out-point in my opinion, and casts serious doubt on the document's authenticity.
Also, would a Hospital Chief Administrator stamp and sign a document without reading it first ?
That thought occurred to me too. He didn't notice whose birth certificate copy this was before signing it? Would he really have stamped and signed it if he had noticed the name? I have my doubts.
It takes a thief, to catch a thief.
This has been his point all along. He never hid who he was, and in fact stated that WHO he was is the only reason he could get it. He paid people off, who wanted cash. He was funded to get this information, and he paid off the people needed to get it.
So the argument that he is undependable, is specious. In fact, he was exactly the type of person needed, to get this information. Going “by the rules”, would have had unsurmountable road blocks.
Bad men, or guys who know how to “work” the system, to get what they want, don’t care about the rules, they care about results.
Now your trying to discredit the product, because of the delivery man.
Wake up people. If you discredit the document, fine. But, so far. Nobody has. Here are the facts:
* This is a typed document
Copy is issued on Feb 1, 09 by
Hilton Magonga
Chief Administrator (so should be there today)
Issued by:
Coast Province General Hospital
Mombasa British Protectoriate of Kenya
Certificate Number 32018
DOB August 4, 1961 Time: 7:42PM
Weight: 7Lbs, 1 Oz 18” Long
Mother: Stanley Ann Obama
Maiden Name: Dunham
Birthplace of Mother:
Wichita, KS, United States
Residence of Mother:
Honalulu, Hawaii, United States
Occupation of Mother: Student
Father:
Barak Hussein Obama
DOB: 1936
Birthplace of Father:
Kanyadhiang village,Kenya
Occupation of Father: Student
Attending Physician:
James O. W. Ang’Awa
Hospital Administrator:
John Kwame Odongo 8/7/1961
Lucas Smith Defense of new birth certificate by WND and Jerome Corsi...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GX1DFV0hsPI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SCc3Axxd8kU&NR=1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AdueOWxo518&NR=1
Here Lucas Smith responds to Corsi, with plausable answers
I personally wrote Smith, and got a response. In that letter, I told him that his credibility was in question, and that it appeared to many to be a scam for cash. He told me that he had a person who represented him, and gave him guidance. I suggested that his credibility would be greatly enhanced if he were to make this part of public record thru a lawyer, much like Orly Taits has done. Even if it is proven fake, its part of public record, and once there, the threats against his life, are gone. It is my hope that he listened and this is why he has put this into the legal system.
So, now the charge that he is in it for the money, is no longer valid, he has put the document into the system, where it is safe. You can get copies all over the net, and dissect it as best you can. I have been trying, and so far, nothing points out as incorrect, or implausable.
The Obamaites are hard at work tho, trying to sew seeds of doubt. So, I am going at this in this way, see what they have to say. Does what they have to stay invalidate the document? If so, what is their proof? Words are not good enough. So far, speculation, questions, nothing more. No HARD proof that the document is not genuine...
He paid people off, who wanted cash. He was funded to get this information, and he paid off the people needed to get it.
So the argument that he is undependable, is specious.
Hold on, friend. I never questioned Lucas Smith's credibility, and I haven't attacked him in any way. Don't dub in something that I didn't say or imply.
I happen to agree with you that Lucas Smith has exactly the sort of qualities required to get the "results".
Now your trying to discredit the product, because of the delivery man.
Again - not so. What I am questioning are certain details about the document itself, and the circumstances of its signing by the hospital administrator.
These are just questions - not accusations or efforts to debunk the document. If they can be answered intelligently, with supportive facts, then I'm satisfied.
The balance of your post has a lot of good information in it. We'll all see where it leads in the days to come.
Federalville will be a step up for Lucas. According to the Cedar Rapids Gazette, he's already done time:
Online court records say Lucas D. Smith, now 29, was convicted in Linn County of forgery in May 1998 and second-degree theft in May 2000. He was released from prison Dec. 25, 2002, the Department of Corrections says.
Thanks.
That is just what I expected about Lucus Smith and now that he and his attorney have knowingly submitted false documentation to a Court of Law, they can be sent to Federal Prison.
There is a date stamp on the top LHS next to the Helton Maganga signature, February 19, 2000 (year unclear) which suggests that what we are looking at is a photocopy of a document stamped with the stamp of the current administrator.
In 1961 the British still used inches and pounds..
I am concerned about that footprint ...
did BC documents in Kenya have them back then ??
or was that a Stanley Ann thing ??
and why only one foot ???
The dates are wrong...British dates were ALWAYS day, month, year...
Unless again Stanley Ann as an American who would notice the different format, filled in those dates ...
I’m concerned that Orly has aligned herself to Smith...
Yes he has placed himnself in a legal web if he lied ...
But what if he works for Barry ???
Who is going to proscecute Smith then ???
Barry can always “pardon” him etc...
I’m not impressed by that affidavit...
If he lied for Barry, Barry will protect him...
Thank you, Tennessee Nana and Agamemnon for pointing out my error. I know the British manner of dates is wrong on the certificate.
TN: You raise interesting questions!
I’m an interesting Nana !!!
:)
LOL! Now you’re sounding like my grandma. She’d say something like that. :)
I work with international dating conventions in regulatory documentation routinely. While day-month-year is a preferred dating method on continental Europe, and to a certain extent preferred in the UK, one will still see both conventions for UK and context for each convention will often be supplied. There is no uniform dating method and it can be confusing at times.
The US generally prefers month-day-year convention, yet even US-supplied documentation differs. Consider the Customs form one fills out for the US when re-entering the US. The dating system is day-month-year. When you fill out your IRS tax forms, however, the requirement is month-day-year.
It is quite possible that Dunham could have influenced the dating convention.
As to the footprint thing, my own father's US hospital birth certificate in 1929 took the print of only the right foot for ID purposes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.