In 1961 the British still used inches and pounds..
I am concerned about that footprint ...
did BC documents in Kenya have them back then ??
or was that a Stanley Ann thing ??
and why only one foot ???
The dates are wrong...British dates were ALWAYS day, month, year...
Unless again Stanley Ann as an American who would notice the different format, filled in those dates ...
I’m concerned that Orly has aligned herself to Smith...
Yes he has placed himnself in a legal web if he lied ...
But what if he works for Barry ???
Who is going to proscecute Smith then ???
Barry can always “pardon” him etc...
I’m not impressed by that affidavit...
If he lied for Barry, Barry will protect him...
Thank you, Tennessee Nana and Agamemnon for pointing out my error. I know the British manner of dates is wrong on the certificate.
TN: You raise interesting questions!
I work with international dating conventions in regulatory documentation routinely. While day-month-year is a preferred dating method on continental Europe, and to a certain extent preferred in the UK, one will still see both conventions for UK and context for each convention will often be supplied. There is no uniform dating method and it can be confusing at times.
The US generally prefers month-day-year convention, yet even US-supplied documentation differs. Consider the Customs form one fills out for the US when re-entering the US. The dating system is day-month-year. When you fill out your IRS tax forms, however, the requirement is month-day-year.
It is quite possible that Dunham could have influenced the dating convention.
As to the footprint thing, my own father's US hospital birth certificate in 1929 took the print of only the right foot for ID purposes.