Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: etraveler13
He never hid who he was, and in fact stated that WHO he was is the only reason he could get it.

He paid people off, who wanted cash. He was funded to get this information, and he paid off the people needed to get it.

So the argument that he is undependable, is specious.

Hold on, friend. I never questioned Lucas Smith's credibility, and I haven't attacked him in any way. Don't dub in something that I didn't say or imply.

I happen to agree with you that Lucas Smith has exactly the sort of qualities required to get the "results".

Now your trying to discredit the product, because of the delivery man.

Again - not so. What I am questioning are certain details about the document itself, and the circumstances of its signing by the hospital administrator.

These are just questions - not accusations or efforts to debunk the document. If they can be answered intelligently, with supportive facts, then I'm satisfied.

The balance of your post has a lot of good information in it. We'll all see where it leads in the days to come.

51 posted on 09/05/2009 10:51:38 AM PDT by Windflier (To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Windflier

Please accept my apology, I was referring to another poster. I hit reply on your box, by mistake.
Sorry for the mixup.


65 posted on 09/05/2009 9:12:35 PM PDT by etraveler13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson