He paid people off, who wanted cash. He was funded to get this information, and he paid off the people needed to get it.
So the argument that he is undependable, is specious.
Hold on, friend. I never questioned Lucas Smith's credibility, and I haven't attacked him in any way. Don't dub in something that I didn't say or imply.
I happen to agree with you that Lucas Smith has exactly the sort of qualities required to get the "results".
Now your trying to discredit the product, because of the delivery man.
Again - not so. What I am questioning are certain details about the document itself, and the circumstances of its signing by the hospital administrator.
These are just questions - not accusations or efforts to debunk the document. If they can be answered intelligently, with supportive facts, then I'm satisfied.
The balance of your post has a lot of good information in it. We'll all see where it leads in the days to come.
Please accept my apology, I was referring to another poster. I hit reply on your box, by mistake.
Sorry for the mixup.