Posted on 01/20/2024 3:17:41 PM PST by Macho MAGA Man
Nikki Haley was born “Nimarata Randhawa” in Bamberg, South Carolina, in 1972. But at the time of her birth, neither one of her parents were American citizens. As recently unearthed by investigative journalist Laura Loomer, both “Haley’s parents were Indian immigrants who did not become U.S. citizens until after her birth in 1972. Her father, Ajit Randhawa, became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 1978, Haley’s office said. Her mother, Raj Randhawa, became a U.S. citizen in 2003, a year before Haley won a seat in the S.C. House.”
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Yes she is, but it doesn’t matter.
Gateway Pundit is garbage.
Maybe so maybe not, until the Supreme Court hears a case due to the ambiguity of the amendment we just can't say.
But who cares? She has no chance to win the presidency and Trump will never pick her as VP. Its a mute point.
Moot point maybe mute too!
“Maybe so maybe not, until the Supreme Court hears a case due to the ambiguity of the amendment we just can’t say.”
I agree with that. Furthermore, the lengthiness of that article alone tells me that yes, there’s ambiguity.
-PJ
HAHAHA Barack’s both fathers were never US citizens. That horse has flown the coop.
Why waste time indict her ASAP for fraudulent attempt to run for Presidency.
Why do you need the SC to read to you what the Constitution says?
In Nimrids case IT IS SIMPLE! “patents (plural) must be Citizens of the USA.”
NIMROD has NEITHER parent being a Citizen. Sometimes a Resident . . . But not a Citizen.
Why, because the more times you re-post an article that's been posted already, the more you increase the likelihood that the article is accurate. Right? Right???
It's like the Big Lie. The more you repeat it, the more true it becomes.
Personally I'll wait for the SCOTUS to make a determination, if they ever do. Until then, it's a matter of argument and discussion, but it's not definite.
Actually, the 146-post thread was a duplicate of one that already had 57 replies.
No, The Constitution Does Not Allow Children Born Of Non-Citizens To Become President Of The United States
01/19/2024 7:22:02 AM PST · by bitt · 57 replies
GATEWAYPUNDIT ^ | 1/19/2024 | Paul Ingrassia
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/4211419/posts
That horse left the barn once Obama was elected. It’s stupid to keep bringing it up time and time again.
Coz some men like to keep flogging a dead horse.
WHERE?
Article. II.
Section. 1.
The executive Power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his Office during the Term of four Years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same Term, be elected, as follows
Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress: but no Senator or Representative, or Person holding an Office of Trust or Profit under the United States, shall be appointed an Elector.
The Electors shall meet in their respective States, and vote by Ballot for two Persons, of whom one at least shall not be an Inhabitant of the same State with themselves. And they shall make a List of all the Persons voted for, and of the Number of Votes for each; which List they shall sign and certify, and transmit sealed to the Seat of the Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate. The President of the Senate shall, in the Presence of the Senate and House of Representatives, open all the Certificates, and the Votes shall then be counted. The Person having the greatest Number of Votes shall be the President, if such Number be a Majority of the whole Number of Electors appointed; and if there be more than one who have such Majority, and have an equal Number of Votes, then the House of Representatives shall immediately chuse by Ballot one of them for President; and if no Person have a Majority, then from the five highest on the List the said House shall in like Manner chuse the President. But in chusing the President, the Votes shall be taken by States, the Representation from each State having one Vote; A quorum for this Purpose shall consist of a Member or Members from two thirds of the States, and a Majority of all the States shall be necessary to a Choice. In every Case, after the Choice of the President, the Person having the greatest Number of Votes of the Electors shall be the Vice President. But if there should remain two or more who have equal Votes, the Senate shall chuse from them by Ballot the Vice President.
The Congress may determine the Time of chusing the Electors, and the Day on which they shall give their Votes; which Day shall be the same throughout the United States.
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
The President shall, at stated Times, receive for his Services, a Compensation, which shall neither be encreased nor diminished during the Period for which he shall have been elected, and he shall not receive within that Period any other Emolument from the United States, or any of them.
Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—”I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
Section. 2.
From Cornell Law School
“A natural born citizen refers to someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth, and did not need to go through a naturalization proceeding later in life. Under the 14th Amendment’s Naturalization Clause and the Supreme Court case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 US. 649, anyone born on U.S. soil and subject to its jurisdiction is a natural born citizen, regardless of parental citizenship. This type of citizenship is referred to as birthright citizenship. One can be a citizen while not being a natural born citizen if, for example, that person gained citizenship through the process of naturalization.
In some rare cases, a person born within the United States may not be a citizen if that person is not subject to U.S. jurisdiction. In Wong Kim Ark, the Supreme Court identifies two specific examples of people not subject to U.S. jurisdiction:
Children born of alien enemies in hostile occupation
Children of diplomatic representatives”
investigative journalist Laura Loomer. Always, always take important or legal advice from Looney Loomer. A newish FR tradition!
Three words for Nimrata Randhawa: Not Constitutionally Eligible!
__________________________________
Three words for Nacho Nugget Man: Quit Posting Trash.
(refer to the two or three previous GP threads and shut up.)
“Furthermore, the lengthiness of that article alone tells me that yes, there’s ambiguity.”
Assinine. The length of the article, which you obviously did not read, is the author piling on evidence to prove his point. There is no ambiguity.
SCOTUS had 8+ years to rule on this when Barack Hussein Obama was nominated twice and won twice. Hid biological or his adopted father, both, were never US citizens.
If our wonderful US Constitution intended the definition of NBC as having both parents US citizens, it would have stated it clearly. Actually the constitution never mentions the word “parent”.
Horse has flown the coop?! Pegasus
...is that you? LOL
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.