“Maybe so maybe not, until the Supreme Court hears a case due to the ambiguity of the amendment we just can’t say.”
I agree with that. Furthermore, the lengthiness of that article alone tells me that yes, there’s ambiguity.
“Furthermore, the lengthiness of that article alone tells me that yes, there’s ambiguity.”
Assinine. The length of the article, which you obviously did not read, is the author piling on evidence to prove his point. There is no ambiguity.
“Maybe so maybe not, until the Supreme Court hears a case due to the ambiguity of the amendment..”
Ummmm, did I miss something like an amendment to the Constitutional requirements for President ?
-fjROberts-