Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Levin: the birther tactic is crap, here's the relevant statute
247Sports ^ | Jan 7th, 2016

Posted on 02/28/2022 12:40:27 PM PST by conservative98

WVUfan222:

Levin: the birther tactic is crap, here's relevant statute:

https://247sports.com/college/west-virginia/Board/103782/Contents/Merk-Levin-the-birther-tactic-is-crap-heres-relevant-statute-71403365/

---------------------------------------

8 U.S. Code § 1401 - Nationals and citizens of United States at birth....

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1401

RDMercEER:

It didn't matter where Obama was born, it doesn't matter where Ted Cruz was born, it didn't matter where John McCain was born, it didn't matter where George Romney was born. The phrase “natural born Citizen” has a specific meaning: namely, someone who was a U.S. citizen at birth with no need to go through a naturalization proceeding at some later time. If one of your parents was a US citizen, which is the case in all four examples, you are a natural born US citizen.

This has been Levin's contention all along. Dishonest leftists, such was Pruto and whoisyourdaddy may want to do a little research, before spouting our their Alinskyite lies. Can either of you provide a link where Mark Levin said Obama couldn't be President because he wasn't a natural born US citizen?

I still don't think Obama was born in Hawaii, but it is a moot point, because at least one parent was a US citizen (and with the possibility of Frank Marshall Davis being his real dad, perhaps both). By birth status, he has every right to be the president.

(Excerpt) Read more at 247sports.com ...


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 2016; anotherstupidvanity; barrygoldwater; birther; birtherism; birthers; canada; constitutional98; cruz; cubanadian; cubnadian; foreignborn; georgeromney; hillary; ibtz; ineligible; johnmccain; levin; liberal98; merklevin; naturalborn; naturalborncitizen; obama; obamalover; oldcrap; oldnews; personalattacks; stirringthepot; tedcruz; trolling; vanity; vikingkitties; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-183 next last
To: conservative98
Dishonest leftists

As well as a number of idiot FReepers also.........

81 posted on 02/28/2022 1:41:14 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Not only that, but all the children ‘created’ from male tourists and servicemen around the world; would be natural born citizens. Nuts.


82 posted on 02/28/2022 1:44:22 PM PST by Theoria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

The writers of the Constitution were “birthers” since they placed the clause in the Constitution.

Every word in the Constitution was debated. So when the “natural born” phrase was placed in it, it meant something — born of citizen parents (as the history professor told us in college) as defined directly by the Immigration Act of 1790. As a qualification for president, the only time it is used.


83 posted on 02/28/2022 1:45:24 PM PST by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pete Dovgan
Mark Levin is wrong.

Mark Levin is not wrong. I think he has more knowledge of Constitutional law than you who is just an internet know it all........

84 posted on 02/28/2022 1:45:26 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: TakebackGOP
’Why are you bringing this up?’

Once the demented one goes south, we will be expected to place an overtly not ‘natural born citizen’ into the Oval Office. This absolutely should not be permitted.

This issue ought never be tucked away as it is is irrelevant. The Founders were prescient in their insisting upon the qualification.

The Constitution when written clearly states that there were 2 categories of Citizens. This was before any ‘Naturalization’ took place, which by any rational conclusion indicates that there are 3 categories of Citizens.

Not every Citizen is a ‘natural born citizen.’

85 posted on 02/28/2022 1:46:16 PM PST by Radix (Politicians; the Law and the Profits )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

One more piece on this from Aug 19, 2013....

Mark Levin: Attacked by a Birther at book signing, Declares Cruz Eligible

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z8__Iwc08MQ

(Levin talks about a guy screaming at him at a book signing in NJ about Ted Cruz and birtherism. Who knows this could have been a poster on a website? I’m not saying it was, but there is one from the area and the most obsessed about this.)

‘This guy gets in my face and points to some obscure note on page whatever. And he says you were wrong about this, you were wrong. And then he goes Ted Cruz is not eligible to be President! He’s not a natural born citizen! But he’s born of a mother who’s an American citizen. Doesn’t that make an American. “No because he was in Canada when he was born.” Ok. But she wasn’t Canadian. She was an American citizen. And so the issue isn’t what the constitution says in that regard. And the way I interpret it is. His mother is an American citizen, so he is an American citizen. That is not a constitutional issue. That is an interpretative issue or a statutory issue if Congress has passed some law subsequent to that to enforce that provision of the constitution. So the face of the constitution isn’t terribly helpful. If he was born of non-citizens in a foreign country that would be easy. So the guy gets in my face and starts pointing and pointing. So I looked at him and pointed back and I cursed unfortunately because he was a nutjob. So I ask him why do you come here and do that is that how you excite yourself or something? So I just want you people to know who like Ted Cruz, I assume they are going to do this to some of these other people. Whether you like Cruz or not for President, I am just making a point that this has become an entire industry. People just get obsessed or conspiratorial. And there is no end to it. And there is nothing I can point to or say that can change their mind. But in my view there is no doubt about it that he is eligible should he choose to run.’


86 posted on 02/28/2022 1:47:05 PM PST by conservative98
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: rolling_stone
On August 4, 1961, at the age of 18, Dunham gave birth to her first child, Barack Obama.

You seem to be right. So she met the "4 years after age 14" requirement. Well, that's embarrassing. I read that she was 17 and never checked it.

87 posted on 02/28/2022 1:47:38 PM PST by TChad ("Joe, we should evacuate the civilians before the military. You understand that, right? Joe?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
And then he goes Ted Cruz is not eligible to be President! He’s not a natural born citizen! But he’s born of a mother who’s an American citizen. Doesn’t that make an American. “No because he was in Canada when he was born.” Ok. But she wasn’t Canadian. She was an American citizen.

Wong Kim Ark is widely considered to be the most significant Supreme Court case regarding the meaning of citizenship at birth.

You won't like what Wong Kim Ark says about this.

88 posted on 02/28/2022 1:51:58 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Outstanding post. The kind that makes Free Republic the BEST site on the web.


89 posted on 02/28/2022 1:52:29 PM PST by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservative98

Yep, the phrase natural born citizen” has a meaning, and anybody willing to read can find it in Wong Kim Ark. Anybody who thinks it can ONLY mean someone who has two citizen parents, as opposed to someone being “legally” born here, is the equivalent of a Sovereign Citizen arguing with a police officer about the need to have a driver’s license or insurance - in other words, some kind of a nut.


90 posted on 02/28/2022 1:53:41 PM PST by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TChad

I retract my post #87 above. I’ll have to check my old posts of the subject. Was the requirement for transfer of citizenship really that one parent was required to have five years of American citizenship after age 14?


91 posted on 02/28/2022 1:53:46 PM PST by TChad ("Joe, we should evacuate the civilians before the military. You understand that, right? Joe?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: bort

FWIW, Al Hamilton, the bastard brat of a scotch peddlar, born on the island of Nevis, West Indies, was POTUS-eligible, despite not being a Natural Born Citizen of any relevant jurisdiction. All of John Adams’ children when born were subjects of the British Crown. Natural Born Subject by that time had expanded by Parliamentary stature to describe a host of newborn babies, which may explain Levin’s definition of Natural Born Citizen:. Anybidy born anywhere in the world to anyone except two non-citizen parents.

I wonder what it was that you read.

By the way, John Adams, overseas minister plenipotentiary negotiating for the independent United States of America, was tossing the exact term “Natural Born Citizen of the United States” around on drafts he authored of what became the 1783 Treaty of Paris. Trying to gain amnesty for our purebloods.


92 posted on 02/28/2022 1:54:27 PM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: poconopundit
What's with Levin anyway? I thought he shook the magic spell that Ted Cruz cast over Levin

Maybe because this stupid article was from six years ago?

93 posted on 02/28/2022 1:55:15 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: TChad

no its 5 years after 14


94 posted on 02/28/2022 1:57:25 PM PST by rolling_stone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Because in the situation you are describing, when someone has lost their citizenship because they left the country, they’re not going to be eligible for the Presidency anyway so it becomes a non-issue.


95 posted on 02/28/2022 1:59:20 PM PST by Bruce Campbells Chin ( .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Penelope Dreadful
Yep, the phrase natural born citizen” has a meaning, and anybody willing to read can find it in Wong Kim Ark. Anybody who thinks it can ONLY mean someone who has two citizen parents, as opposed to someone being “legally” born here, is the equivalent of a Sovereign Citizen arguing with a police officer about the need to have a driver’s license or insurance - in other words, some kind of a nut.

You are aware that Wong Kim Ark cites the 14th amendment as the basis for it's conclusion?

What were "natural born citizens" before the 14th amendment?

Also, Wong Kim Ark specifically excludes people like Ted Cruz, who are born in a foreign country.

96 posted on 02/28/2022 1:59:25 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

Constitutiinal NBC of US = Plain Vanilla, at least two generations removed from any Exotic Flavoring!!!


97 posted on 02/28/2022 1:59:52 PM PST by one guy in new jersey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: conservative98
The article being referenced was from 2016. Always brings out the so called experts on who is eligible to run for president and who is not.

This crap gets tiresome........

98 posted on 02/28/2022 1:59:52 PM PST by Hot Tabasco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: TChad
Was the requirement for transfer of citizenship really that one parent was required to have five years of American citizenship after age 14?

My recollection from looking at this at the time was that she didn't meet the requirements, but don't make the mistake of thinking these requirements applied to birth inside the United States. The maternal residency requirements only applied to a birth outside of the United States.

I believe it was the Naturalization act of 1952 that applies to Barack Obama.

99 posted on 02/28/2022 2:02:11 PM PST by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: DiogenesLamp

Should you actually read Wong Kim Ark, it will explain that all to you! But I suspect that it will do not good for you to read it, because, like The Sovereign Citizen, you will never admit that you are wrong. Nope. You will die and go to Hell before you ever admit that the fringe on the flag is meaningless, and that Capitalizing your name does not make you a different entity! Nope. Birther and Sovereign Citizens were transexuals in mindset before trannies became a thing - self identifying as whatever based on their subjective whims.


100 posted on 02/28/2022 2:05:08 PM PST by Penelope Dreadful (And there is Pansies, that's for Thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 181-183 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson