Skip to comments.BREAKING: Supreme Court Dismisses President Trump and Attorney Lin Wood’s Final Election Challenge Without Comment
Posted on 03/08/2021 10:57:29 AM PST by White Lives Matter
What a dark day for America. Democrats are now allowed to make any changes to election law whenever they feel necessary without consequence.
The Supreme Court also threw out Attorney Lin Wood’s election challenge without comment.
The Supreme Court turned down EVERY SINGLE election case this year without comment. What a tragedy.
It was the Trump Wisconsin case that was dismissed this morning.
(Excerpt) Read more at thegatewaypundit.com ...
Turn out the lights, our country is over...
So there’s no standing before the election in state courts. No standing after the election in any court. So what kind of country do we live in?
Why would SCOTUS comment on something as trivial as election integrity.
In 2022, have armed patriots standing 24 hour watch at every ballot collection box across the country. Video document every second from the time they are put out until they are picked up. Follow every vehicle that collects ballots, and video their drive back to the election office.
Do not relent.
The enemy has gotten to them through physical threats and probably blackmail against Roberts.
United Soviet States of America?
Not even a dissent from Justice Thomas...
“Trump’s three picks had to be threatened for this to happen.”
Then they are worthless, weak-minded cowards and no better than their liberal counterparts on the court. They should all be arrested, tried and convicted for treason and betraying their oaths to US Constitution and Nation.
“There, comrades, is the answer to all our problems. It is summed up in a single word— Man”
― George Orwell, Animal Farm
We all know why. Someday their time will come. The world will know.
Nobody has freaking “standing”.
My questions are ....
Is SCOTUS saying that it has no jurisdiction over the way state’s run their elections, ergo the states have to settle it?
If so, then that would mean that NO federal court could hear a case involving state election laws or say, voter ID laws, right?
So, that would mean that Abrams’ sister never had and will never have authority to hear any case brought to her by her sister so they can defraud the people of Georgia and America anymore?
And that would mean that any other state that wants to strengthen their election laws, pass some form of voter ID if they don’t have it, restructure absentee ballots and get rid of mail in voting, can do so without having the Left run to the 9th circuit or the DC circuit so they can get one of their judges to rule for them, right?
Yup, officially sanctioned theft
What a bunch of useless slugs, shame on them, shame on every single one of them.
We have video of their theft in 2020.
Evidence doesn’t matter.
This just forces all parties to engage in election fraud from here on out.
No court said “there is no standing.” They said Lin Wood has no standing. Because he doesn’t, under long established tenets of the standing doctrine.
I’m not voting ever again, since no one, not Republicans, or the courts have any respect for my ballot, or the Constitution, enough to want to protect, or enforce either one of them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.