Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

I’m Retired and Regret Claiming Social Security at 70 — Here’s Why
GOBankingRates ^ | May 13, 2025 | Laura Beck

Posted on 05/14/2025 12:38:15 PM PDT by where's_the_Outrage?

We’ve all heard the advice: Wait until you’re 70 to claim Social Security and you’ll get the biggest possible monthly check. Tim F., a retired healthcare worker from Arizona, followed this advice to the letter. But now, at 75, he’s having second thoughts.

GOBankingRates spoke with Tim to understand why he wishes he’d claimed his benefits earlier. His insights might just change the way you think about your own retirement plans.

Tim thought he was doing everything right.

“Everything you read says you should wait until 70 if you can,” he shared. “I guess I thought, well, I can, so I should. I didn’t stop to think about if that was actually the best plan for me.”

Tim likes larger monthly checks, but he’s not sure they were worth the price.

“Looking back, I would’ve wanted that extra money when my wife was still around.”.....

Tim doesn’t believe waiting until 70 is wrong for everyone. But he does have some advice for those trying to make this decision:

Consider your health. “Be realistic about how you might feel in 5 years,” said Tim.

Talk it over with your significant other. It’s not a good decision if it’s not made together.

Think about what you want to do in retirement. Travel? Spend time with grandkids? Take up knitting? Make a list and let your finances follow.

Look at your other income sources. Side hustles don’t have to end with retirement.

(Excerpt) Read more at msn.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Health/Medicine; Society
KEYWORDS: retiredincome; retirement; socialsecurity; ss
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141 next last
To: af_vet_1981

Social Security is nothing but a government-endorsed PONZI Scheme. in 12 years when I become “eligible”, I suspect there won’t be much if anything left for me to draw.


81 posted on 05/14/2025 2:21:40 PM PDT by TheBattman (Democrats-Progressives-Marxists-Socialists-Satanists: redundant labels.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: shotgun

You ought to be enjoying that young wife. Or you can keep working till you drop, and then she finds a young stud so that she and him can live off of your money.


82 posted on 05/14/2025 2:22:49 PM PDT by caver ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I took it at 62...didn’t think I’d make it to 65.


83 posted on 05/14/2025 2:25:16 PM PDT by RckyRaCoCo (Time to throw them out of the Temple...again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I saw a lot of people do about the same. Many dead within 6 months. Bear, at least was really doing something he loved and he was forced into retirement.


84 posted on 05/14/2025 2:28:03 PM PDT by packrat35 (Pureblood! No clot shot for me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: TheBattman

I’m sorry to read that and my heart goes out to you.. It’s a shame we are forced to contribute to a fund that Congress constantly robs rather than being free to invest that same money in our own retirement funds.


85 posted on 05/14/2025 2:28:59 PM PDT by CatHerd (Whoever said "all's fair in love and war" probably never participated in either.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

If you wait until 67 versus taking it at 62 you don’t even begin to break even until you’re 72


86 posted on 05/14/2025 2:29:18 PM PDT by Hammerhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I started at 66. Pretty happy with that decision.


87 posted on 05/14/2025 2:41:47 PM PDT by 6ppc (During times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act -George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
Ditto. I get people waiting until 65, but 70, nope. I know too many people who either died shortly after turning 70 or were diagnosed with a serious illness at 70. Take the money and enjoy life while you can.

My dad was planning on taking an early retirement. He had seen to many people wait and die early before they could enjoy not working.

The company talked him into staying a few more months. In that time, he had a massive, fatal heart attack. And he was in his mid 50's.

88 posted on 05/14/2025 2:42:30 PM PDT by metmom ( He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ebshumidors

SS at 66, and I continued to work another 5 years. Glad I did that.


89 posted on 05/14/2025 2:47:13 PM PDT by healy61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Since a lot of my family lived into their 80’s, I figured taking SS at 62 made sense. No regrets.

IBM Research retirement deal was one of the last good ones. I retired at 58 and they smeared my last year’s salary over the next 7 years when calculating my retirement amount. I didn’t get anything for the next 7 years, but got a larger amount at the end of the 7 years. Also gave money and retraining for week long workshops in Maine. Great fun and a new career attempt. That’s how I got agented for screenplays with Writers & Artists in Hollywood. LOVE IBM. Still have warm fuzzies toward them.


90 posted on 05/14/2025 2:48:19 PM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: z3n

I started a few years ago when the democrats were in control and busy destroying the country.

Who knew if SS would still be around, no matter how much I paid into it.

I don’t regret it. It has helped pay the bills and my health isn’t the greatest so I don’t how long I’ve got.

Plus, my extended family has a history of longevity, but my dad passed at 56 and my mom at 67. Lost a brother just last year and he was 61, same deal as my dad, but the alcoholism, diabetes, and obesity sure didn’t help.


91 posted on 05/14/2025 2:49:50 PM PDT by metmom ( He who testifies to these things says, “Surely I am coming soon." Amen. Come, Lord Jesus.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

All depends on how long you live. There is a breakeven point after which you made the right decision. If you die before that, you made the wrong decision.


92 posted on 05/14/2025 2:56:59 PM PDT by E. Pluribus Unum (Democrats are the Party of anger, hate and violence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I took SS at 62. My full benefit age is 67. I don’t regret it. What’s aggravating is that if I die my wife won’t receive any of my benefits because she earned more in her career than I did.


93 posted on 05/14/2025 2:57:02 PM PDT by kawhill ("Ain't gonna drink it? You tell me don't be like you, but you offer me a beer. Well which is it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I took SS at 62. My full benefit age is 67. I don’t regret it. What’s aggravating is that if I die my wife won’t receive any of my benefits because she earned more in her career than I did.


94 posted on 05/14/2025 2:59:07 PM PDT by kawhill ("Ain't gonna drink it? You tell me don't be like you, but you offer me a beer. Well which is it?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

It’s a gamble either way. Wait until you get the largest amount, and you might not even collect the first check. Take it early and at least have something coming in besides bills.

I just wonder why they take Medicare out of the SS check when it was collected as a separate tax. Shouldn’t that tax have been invested so that the SS check wouldn’t be reduced? At least I had a couple of years of full SS checks.


95 posted on 05/14/2025 3:19:47 PM PDT by skr (1 Peter 1:15 - But as he which hath called you is holy, so be ye holy in all manner of conversation)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I claimed SS at 63 and kept working so I got half he check. That was enough to make me solvent again. When I hit 65 full payments resumed though at a lower level than if I had waited for 70. I am 79 now and Over all I have run the numbers and have determined that I did better totally than if I had waited for 70. And I am still working.


96 posted on 05/14/2025 3:21:24 PM PDT by ThanhPhero (covfefe xdpx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

I will wait until I am 70, because my wife is considerably younger than I am, and I have little savings. I understand that if I take SS before 67 my regular job ensures that my SS will be taxes heavily. Iwon’t be able to retire, so 70 it is.


97 posted on 05/14/2025 3:21:25 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981
Everybody thinks they are going to live forever so they get greedy and hold out for more SSA money.

That isn’t being greedy. It is making a prudential judgment.
98 posted on 05/14/2025 3:24:27 PM PDT by Dr. Sivana ("Whatsoever he shall say to you, do ye." (John 2:5))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: The Truth Will Make You Free

“A contributing factor often ignored in these FR discussions, is that a surviving spouse can receive the higher payment, so that’s an added reason to delay my higher payout.”

In our case the numbers were super clear.

I should wait until I was 70 to collect. Then my (much younger and much lower earning) wife could collect whenever she wanted—eventually she started collecting at 65.

Why? Because (as you note) if I died first she gets the high survivor number. In addition her benefit was calculated based on my benefit which meant she received a much higher number while I was alive.

We were looking at the “family” number to make the decision—not the individual number.


99 posted on 05/14/2025 3:32:43 PM PDT by cgbg (It was not us. It was them--all along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: where's_the_Outrage?

Also took it at 62. Break even age is ~74. If you don’t need it then invest for 12 years. Waaaayyyy ahead. On top of that, there’s a pot of money for heirs. I’ve known a lot of people who waited but tee’d off before they benefitted.


100 posted on 05/14/2025 3:33:37 PM PDT by Bonemaker (invictus maneo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 141 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson