Posted on 01/02/2025 5:36:20 AM PST by Red Badger
The James Webb Space Telescope has found evidence of large, bright galaxies in the early universe, challenging traditional dark matter theories and suggesting a rapid galactic formation as predicted by MOND. Credit: SciTechDaily.com New findings from the James Webb Space Telescope contradict traditional theories about early galaxy formation, revealing large and bright galaxies instead of the expected small, dim structures.
This observation supports the Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND) theory, which disputes the role of dark matter and suggests a rapid formation of galaxies in the early universe, presenting a challenge to the widely accepted dark matter hypothesis.
Challenging Conventional Galaxy Formation Theories
The prevailing theory of galaxy formation in the early universe suggested that the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) would detect faint signals from small, primitive galaxies. However, new data challenge this idea, casting doubt on the widely accepted hypothesis that invisible dark matter helped the earliest stars and galaxies clump together.
Instead, observations show that the oldest galaxies are unexpectedly large and bright. This finding aligns with an alternative theory of gravity, according to research from Case Western Reserve University published recently in The Astrophysical Journal. The results call into question astronomers’ long-held understanding of how the universe’s first structures formed.
Protogalaxies as seen by the James Webb Space Telescope. Credit: NASA Evidence Supporting Modified Gravity
“What the theory of dark matter predicted is not what we see,” said Case Western Reserve astrophysicist Stacy McGaugh, whose paper describes structure formation in the early universe.
Rather than dark matter driving galaxy formation, McGaugh suggests that modified gravity could be the key. A theory called Modified Newtonian Dynamics (MOND), proposed in 1998, predicted that galaxy formation in the early universe occurred much faster than the Cold Dark Matter model, known as lambda-CDM, had anticipated.
The Role of JWST in Galactic Observations
JWST was designed to answer some of the biggest questions in the universe, such as how and when did stars and galaxies form? Until it was launched in 2021, no telescope was able to see that deeply into the universe and far back in time.
Lambda-CDM predicts that galaxies were formed by gradual accretion of matter from small to larger structures, due to the extra gravity provided by the mass of dark matter.
“Astronomers invented dark matter to explain how you get from a very smooth early universe to big galaxies with lots of empty space between them that we see today,” McGaugh said.
The small pieces assembled in larger and larger structures until galaxies formed. JWST should be able to see these small galaxy precursors as dim light.
MOND’s Predictive Success
“The expectation was that every big galaxy we see in the nearby universe would have started from these itty-bitty pieces,” he said.
But even at higher and higher redshift—looking earlier and earlier into the evolution of the universe—the signals are larger and brighter than expected.
MOND predicted that the mass that becomes a galaxy assembled rapidly and initially expands outward with the rest of the universe. The stronger force of gravity slows, then reverses, the expansion, and the material collapses on itself to form a galaxy. In this theory, there is no dark matter at all.
The large and bright structures seen by JWST very early in the universe were predicted by MOND over a quarter century ago, McGaugh said. He co-authored the paper with former Case Western Reserve postdoctoral researcher Federico Lelli, now at INAF—Arcetri Astrophysical Observatory in Italy, and former graduate student Jay Franck. The fourth coauthor is James Schombert from the University of Oregon.
“The bottom line is, ‘I told you so,’” McGaugh said. “I was raised to think that saying that was rude, but that’s the whole point of the scientific method: Make predictions and then check which come true.” He added that finding a theory compatible with both MOND and General Relativity is still a great challenge.
Reference:
“Accelerated Structure Formation: The Early Emergence of Massive Galaxies and Clusters of Galaxies”
by Stacy S. McGaugh, James M. Schombert, Federico Lelli and Jay Franck, 12 November 2024, The Astrophysical Journal.
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad834d
Some galaxies are stupid.
Which one do we live in?....................
The main problem is not so much conflicting theories as conflicting evidence. MOND predicts no dark matter, and seems to explain what JWST is seeing. But we are also seeing direct evidence of dark matter by way of gravitational lensing. Namely, in the Bullet Cluster where dark matter and visible matter have separated, yet lensing occurs where not enough visible matter exists.
Fiction can also be "rapid" formation, at least on a galactic scale
So what does this mean for the Big Bang theory?
Dr. Jason Lisle predicted a lot of what James Webb telescope is now seeing because he is creationist and also a astronomist. See https://biblicalscienceinstitute.com/astronomy/the-james-webb-space-telescope/
Lensing occurs where not enough visible matter can be seen because space itself is compressed in the early universe and causing the lensing effect. Like light passing thru water and air, it gets shifted..................
I like the ‘63s best.
Well, since ours is headed to Andromeda, I’d say it’s damn stupid.
It’s moot to me. I’m stuck on 🤡🌎.
I have been reading a book about this since my childhood. It perfectly describes the beginning of the heavens and the Earth in the start of chapter 1.
EC
Perfectly, perhaps, but in not much detail. That’s not its purpose anyway, any more than a book on gardening is expected to tell you how a lawn mower engine works.
Dammed Xeelee at it again
“So what does this mean for the Big Bang theory?”
It means precisely what glaciers melting, glaciers forming, more tornadoes, and less tornadoes mean for “Climate Change”...every aberration or discovery only proves the a priori assumption.
And God said.....
Sounds like God’s handiwork is confounding we mere mortals...yet again.
No, what does this mean for the Creation theory?
God spoke - it came into existence.
Really simple.....
Astronomers Back to the Drawing Board
The same answer I get asking where did the first atom come from what made matter.
Oh well
Where did the singularity of the Great Black Hole that started the Big Bang come from?............😉
Ping!................
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.