Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ancient DNA reveals the world’s oldest family tree
University of York ^ | 22 December 2021 | unattributed

Posted on 01/02/2022 11:32:10 AM PST by SunkenCiv

Most of the people buried in one of the best-preserved Neolithic tombs in Britain were from five continuous generations of a single extended family, new research involving the University of York has revealed.

In a study published in Nature, researchers analysed DNA extracted from the bones and teeth of 35 individuals entombed approximately 5700 years ago at Hazleton North long cairn in the Cotswolds-Severn region. They found that 27 of them were descended from four women who all had children with the same man.
Kinship
The group lived around 100 years after farming had been introduced to Britain and the authors of the study say that the results provide new insights into kinship and burial practices in Neolithic times.

Co-author of the study, Dr Lindsey Büster from the Department of Archaeology at the University of York, said: “This breakthrough study demonstrates the potential of fully integrated cultural and biomolecular approaches to understanding past societies and offers us a glimpse into the ways people who lived and died thousands of years ago articulated their relationships with one another”.

The cairn at Hazleton North included two L-shaped burial chambers which were located north and south of the main ‘spine’ of the linear structure. The research findings indicate that men were generally buried with their father and brothers, suggesting that descent was patrilineal with later generations buried at the tomb connected to the first generation entirely through male relatives.

While two of the daughters of the lineage who died in childhood were buried in the tomb, the complete absence of adult daughters suggests that their remains were placed either in the tombs of male partners with whom they had children, or elsewhere.

(Excerpt) Read more at york.ac.uk ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: cotswolds; dna; godsgravesglyphs; hazletonnorth; helixmakemineadouble; history; neolithic; severn
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last
To: AndyJackson

it might not have been all at once. Women often died in childbirth not too long ago and a man would simply marry again.


21 posted on 01/02/2022 2:13:02 PM PST by TexasFreeper2009
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Harmless Teddy Bear
Childbirth did tend to kill you.

27 children from 4 mothers means that each had, on average, about 7 children. Taking into account the dangers of childbirth and infant mortality, that is astonishing.

I imagine (although I have not researched this) that woman giving birth to seven live children would have been noteworthy, even in the Middle Ages.

22 posted on 01/02/2022 2:19:32 PM PST by TontoKowalski (You can call me "Dick.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

My great times 5 grandfather married 3 times and fatered 87 children.

A lot of the kids died young from disease. 6 in one month alone in 1870s.


23 posted on 01/02/2022 2:28:02 PM PST by Fledermaus (I'll wear a mask when Dr. Fraudchi shuts the hell up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Glad2bnuts; SunkenCiv

Haha, yes. This is nothing unusual and still goes on to this very day.


24 posted on 01/02/2022 2:52:19 PM PST by Scarlett156 (Don't take it personally. I just get bored really easily. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Co-author of the study, Dr Lindsey Büster from the Department of Archaeology at the University of York, said: “Please take my findings seriously in spite of my ridiculous name”.
25 posted on 01/02/2022 2:52:53 PM PST by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
While it is somewhat interesting to learn a bit about the procreational habits of descendants of a particular, heavily patriarchal, now British Isle family tree branch from 5700 years ago, I'm even more interested to hear from research into those who had time well beyond their struggle for survival (already 80k+ years ago advanced from hunter-gatherers to farming, apparently) to congregate at Gobekli Tepe 11,000+ years ago. All the more, I'm interested in the Denisovans, who were living and using precision drills to make jewelry 40k+ years ago. There's apparently Denisovan DNA scattered through "the four corners" of the world.


26 posted on 01/02/2022 2:52:55 PM PST by rx (Truth will out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
It’s a sad reality of the human species that for most of our time on this planet, most men had no children, and the men who did have children had them by a truly startling number of women. In some societies, 17 women had children for every man who left descendants.

It’s good to be king. Or Khan. Or just a village chief.

27 posted on 01/02/2022 3:00:47 PM PST by ccmay (Too much Law; not enough Order.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TontoKowalski
Not 27 children from those same 4 women. Five generations in the tomb which would mean (if we allow each women one child which would be the minimum possible) four in the first generation and about five in each following generation.

There were also eight "step-sons" where the woman apparently joined along the community with her child.

Really a fascinating find. I will need to locate the original paper in order to answer a lot of questions I have.

28 posted on 01/02/2022 3:25:54 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (add a dab of lavender in milk, leave town with an orange and pretend you're laughing with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ccmay
Male DNA tends to vanish where female does not.

Guy has no sons and his Y line vanishes.

Woman has no daughters and her X line will still show up in her granddaughters.

29 posted on 01/02/2022 3:28:09 PM PST by Harmless Teddy Bear (add a dab of lavender in milk, leave town with an orange and pretend you're laughing with it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
I'm pretty sure it wasn't this guy:


30 posted on 01/02/2022 3:29:44 PM PST by nicollo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rx

I am curious as to why there is a Homo sapiens bottleneck at 50 to 70k years ago. Modern humans were nearly extinct due to a possible super volcano, but the Neanderthals and Denisovans didn’t seem to have suffered this set back. Curious, in my opinion.


31 posted on 01/02/2022 4:19:37 PM PST by wintertime ( Behind every government school teacher stand armed police.( Real bullets in those guns on the hip!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Fascinating! Thanks for posting!


32 posted on 01/02/2022 8:31:25 PM PST by PistolPaknMama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“They found that 27 of them were descended from four women who all had children with the same man.”

I know woman from Uganda who has 27 brothers and sisters from one father with 7 wives.


33 posted on 01/02/2022 9:10:31 PM PST by Rebelbase
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wintertime

Maybe location? Homo sapiens were in African savannahs so more affected?

Or perhaps we are the weaker sub species physically?


34 posted on 01/03/2022 4:08:55 AM PST by Cronos ( One cannot desire freedom from the Cross, especially when one is especially chosen for the cross)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: AndyJackson
Lucky? Maybe not. Imagine putting up with 4 wives with PMS at the same time.

And since they were buried with honor, one should presume they were wives or concubines not slaves.

Or given the high death rate in childbirth, it might be one after another.

Actually a tribal leader might have lots of wives, to show status. In some societies, men have a high mortality from hunting accidents or war, these extra women might be married by the chief, especially if they are widows,so that they and their other children wouldn't starve to death. And of course young women might prefer living a leisurely life as a third wife instead of marrying a poor schmuck.

Finally, many tribes have taboos against intercourse when the wife is pregnant or breast feeding, because if a woman gets pregnant her breast milk dries up and the baby dies. And they might breast feed 2 to 4 years.

African proverb: poor guy, 4 wives, all pregnant or nursing. He might as well be single.

35 posted on 01/03/2022 1:34:32 PM PST by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: LadyDoc

I was just being flip. I presume the consequences for a male of sex and getting a woman pregnant have, with brief exceptions, such as war and rapine, or the social breakdown caused by folks trying to cause a progressive revolution, are pretty much constant throughout human existence, at least where any sort of permanent human culture has remained.


36 posted on 01/03/2022 3:27:25 PM PST by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: mountainlion
Wonder how many had 6 fingers.

My name is Inigo Montoya, you killed my father, prepare to die!

37 posted on 05/28/2022 8:13:21 AM PDT by null and void (We're trapped between too many questions unanaswered, and too many answers unquestioned...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-37 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson