Rabbit Bone One of the rabbit bones dated for the study. Credit: Andrew Somerville, Iowa State University Posted on 06/02/2021 10:39:00 AM PDT by Red Badger
An unexpected discovery by an Iowa State University researcher suggests that the first humans may have arrived in North America more than 30,000 years ago – nearly 20,000 years earlier than originally thought.
Andrew Somerville, an assistant professor of anthropology in world languages and cultures, says he and his colleagues made the discovery while studying the origins of agriculture in the Tehuacan Valley in Mexico. As part of that work, they wanted to establish a date for the earliest human occupation of the Coxcatlan Cave in the valley, so they obtained radiocarbon dates for several rabbit and deer bones that were collected from the cave in the 1960s as part of the Tehuacan Archaeological-Botanical Project. The dates for the bones suddenly took Somerville and his colleagues in a different direction with their work.
The date ranges for the bone samples from the base of the cave ranged from 33,448 to 28,279 years old. The results are published in the academic journal Latin American Antiquity. Somerville says even though previous studies had not dated items from the bottom of the cave, he was not expecting such old ages. The findings add to the debate over a long-standing theory that the first humans crossed the Bering Land Bridge into the Americas 13,000 years ago.
“We weren’t trying to weigh in on this debate or even find really old samples. We were just trying to situate our agricultural study with a firmer timeline,” Somerville said. “We were surprised to find these really old dates at the bottom of the cave, and it means that we need to take a closer look at the artifacts recovered from those levels.”
Somerville says the findings provide researchers with a better understanding of the chronology of the region. Previous studies relied on charcoal and plant samples, but he says the bones were a better material for dating. However, questions still remain. Most importantly, is there a human link to the bottom layer of the cave where the bones were found?
To answer that question, Somerville and Matthew Hill, ISU associate professor of anthropology, plan to take a closer look at the bone samples for evidence of cut marks that indicate the bones were butchered by a stone tool or human, or thermal alternations that suggest the bones were boiled or roasted over fire. He says the possible stone tools from the early levels of the cave may also yield clues.
Rabbit Bone One of the rabbit bones dated for the study. Credit: Andrew Somerville, Iowa State University
“Determining whether the stone artifacts were products of human manufacture or if they were just naturally chipped stones would be one way to get to the bottom of this,” Somerville said. “If we can find strong evidence that humans did in fact make and use these tools, that’s another way we can move forward.”
Year-long journey to even find the bones Not only was this discovery unexpected, but the process of tracking down the animal bones to take samples was more than Somerville anticipated. The collection of artifacts from the 1960s Tehuacan Archaeological-Botanical Project was distributed to different museums and labs in Mexico and the United States, and it was unclear where the animal bones were sent.
After a year of emails and cold calls, Somerville and his collaborator, Isabel Casar from the National Autonomous University of Mexico, had a potential lead for a lab in Mexico City. The lab director, Joaquin Arroyo-Cabrales, agreed to give Somerville and Casar a tour to help search for the missing collection. The tour proved to be beneficial. Among the countless boxes of artifacts, they found what they were looking for.
“Having spent months trying to locate the bones, we were excited to find them tucked away on the bottom shelf in a dark corner of the lab,” Somerville said. “At the time, we felt that was a great discovery, we had no idea it would lead to this.”
Once he located the bones, Somerville got permission from the Mexican government to take small samples – about 3/4 inch in length and 1/4 inch in width – from 17 bones (eight rabbits and nine deer) for radiocarbon dating. If closer examination of the bones provides evidence of a human link, Somerville says it will change what we know about the timing and how the first people came to America.
“Pushing the arrival of humans in North America back to over 30,000 years ago would mean that humans were already in North America prior to the period of the Last Glacial Maximum, when the Ice Age was at its absolute worst,” Somerville said. “Large parts of North America would have been inhospitable to human populations. The glaciers would have completely blocked any passage over land coming from Alaska and Canada, which means people probably would have had to come to the Americas by boats down the Pacific coast.”
Isabel Casar, a professor at the National Autonomous University of Mexico, and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales, a researcher with the National Institute of Anthropology and History in Mexico, contributed to this research. The work was funded by the National Science Foundation and the Wenner-Gren Foundation.
Reference: “New AMS Radiocarbon Ages from the Preceramic Levels of Coxcatlan Cave, Puebla, Mexico: A Pleistocene Occupation of the Tehuacan Valley?” by Andrew D. Somerville, Isabel Casar and Joaquín Arroyo-Cabrales, 19 May 2021, Latin American Antiquity. DOI: 10.1017/laq.2021.26
PinGGG!....................
The “native people” are really not natives, but migrants.
Let me be the first to proclaim this racist.
So the first nations are not first but a distant 2nd?
The Indians are not going to like this one bit.
But BIPOCs? Weren’t the ALWAYS here? Straight out of Africa.
When the Climate people started talking about “settled science”, every decent scientist in the world should have jumped up and said, “Hang on. We never really know much of anything in science. We don’t “prove” things in science — that’s a mathematical concept not a scientific concept. Science is a quest, we are constantly learning new things. Science is never “settled” and it’s a bad idea to talk about it that way.”
But, of course, scientists kept their mouths shut.
Didn’t they find bones way older than they were supposed to be in Washington state back during the Clinton years?
exactly
North America had aborigines?
If you look at the coasts of Africa and South America, they are really close at their closest points...............
Low tide crossing if you’re quick? :-}
Correct. Humans are not an indigenous species of the Americas. There are no ‘indigenous people’ here. As I understand it, there have never been any fossilized remains from the Homo Group found anywhere in the Americans other than the ones from homo sapiens (modern man) that found there way here an estimated 13K years ago (or maybe somewhat earlier, if this story is accurate).
I for one, salute our ancient rabbit overlords.
It’s only about 1800 miles apart.
Whereas the Pilgrims had to travel 3200 miles..............
Do you say that about europeans? They’re even less native.
BTW- indigenous or native simply means first.
That was Kennewick Man, found in 1996.
According to the Solutrean hypothesis, the injuns kicked out former inhabitants who were of European descent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solutrean_hypothesis
Injuns = Siberian-Americans
Here’s a link to a thread from last year about another cave Mexico.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3867807/posts
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.