Posted on 04/22/2021 11:17:31 AM PDT by rajesh0540
According to a startling recent study on the COVID-19 vaccinations, the Pfizer coronavirus vaccine has long-term health risks that have not historically been disclosed, including âALS, Alzheimer's, and other neurological degenerative diseases.â
The new RNA-based SARSCoV-2 vaccines were approved in the United States under an emergency order without rigorous long-term protection monitoring, according to the article. âIn this study, the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was assessed for its ability to cause prion-based disease in vaccine recipients.â According to the CDC, prion-based disorders are a type of neurodegenerative disease, which means that the Pfizer vaccine is likely to cause long-term brain injury and detrimental health consequences.
According to a National Library of Medicine study, this is particularly worrying because the Pfizer vaccine is an mRNA vaccine, an untested form of vaccine that produces new proteins that can potentially insert into the human genome. In other words, after having the vaccine, you could develop degenerative brain diseases at some point in your life.
âThe vaccine RNA sequence as well as the spike protein target association were examined for the ability to transform intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations,â according to the article. According to Alzpedia, TDP-43 is a protein that has been linked to dementia, ALS, and even Alzheimer's disease. According to the Human Genome Database, the FUS protein is also considered to induce ALS and Hereditary Essential Tremors.
The aim of the experiment for the study was to see whether these two dangerous proteins could insert themselves into our DNA, as an mRNA vaccine is supposed to do. According to the paper, âthe vaccine RNA has complex sequences that may trigger TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations,â which means that both proteins have the ability to insert themselves in our DNA and cause dangerous neurological diseases.
The abstract review of the study concludes, "The enclosed conclusion, as well as additional possible dangers, leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA-based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature, and that the vaccine may do much more harm than good." The study concludes, "The vaccine may be a bioweapon and much more harmful than the initial virus."
Despite these credible claims, National File contacted the CDC to ask why the Pfizer vaccine is still being administered. Prior to print, no response was obtained.
Why has this article and many other articles reporting negative news about the ChiCom vaccine not been blocked by Fakebook,Youtube and Twitter like they were prior to President Trumps loss to the Walking Idiot.
If people knew how bad these vaccines were they would Not have taken them.
As a person who has not taken the vaccine I’ll take my chances with getting it naturally.
My advice is don’t get that Vaccine.
Thanks
Did you read it?
And here’s the rebuttal/debunking.
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/can-mrna-based-covid-19-vaccines-cause-prion-disease/
How did Classen “evaluate the potential to convert TDP-43 and or FUS to their prion based disease causing states.” No, seriously, exactly how did he do that? He doesn’t say. Sure, he claims to have “analyzed” the mRNA sequence encoding the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that was used in the Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine to induce cells to encode the protein to be used as the vaccine’s antigen, but he didn’t say how he did that. Classen appears to be leading readers to believe that he did some sort of bioinformatics analysis of the nucleotide sequence of the mRNA used in Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine, but details matter. Nowhere is there a figure showing the alignments of the sequences that he allegedly found that can “activate” TDP-43 and FUS. Nowhere in the paper is a description of the specific algorithms used to produce these claimed “alignments”. Nowhere is there a description of the methodology used or the analysis of the “goodness of fit” for the sequences that he claims to have identified that align with prion “activating” proteins. Nowhere is there a description of the controls, such as normal RNA sequences that contain the relevant sequences, which are common, so common as to be ubiquitous.
Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist affiliated with Georgetown University, told USA TODAY Classen’s paper held “no scientific weight at all” and that the journal his article is published in, Microbiology & Infectious Diseases, was “not a reputable or reliable journal.” (Microbiology & Infectious Diseases is an open-access journal published by SciVision Publishers, a potential predatory publisher intended for profit rather than academic peer-review.)
Dr. David Gorski, professor of surgery and oncology at the Wayne State University School of Medicine, echoed Rasmussen in a Feb. 22 blog post for Science-Based Medicine.
...but....isn't that also true if you didn't get the shot?
What Pfizer and Moderna, the mRNA twins, really come down to are, what is, if any, going to be the antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE) effect.
As you pointed out the mRNA research is at least 10 years old (older if you include trials) and was directed initially as cancer-killing vehicles to utilize the immune system to attack cancer cells, which has been vastly hit-or-miss to date; however, at least that timeline has produced a pool of patients who have not produced a statistically-signifiant, unwanted 'expression' of adverse genetic fallout from mRNA treatment.
10 years is young in testing, no doubt, and of course this was an enhanced, "Operation Warp Speed" timeline to utilize this 'still-young' delivery package for a resilient, Chinese-engineered-to-cause-a-global-pandemic SARS virus.
I will get my vaccine the natural way, catch covid 19 sometime in the future and gain some immunity yhe way that nature intends for it to happen
My husband and I have decided NOT to get the vaccine. I wish President Trump would stop bragging about it, because you can be sure as shootin’ that if it DOES turn out to have horrible side effects, the blame will fall squarely at HIS feet -— not FAUXTUS, not WHO, not Falsie, nor anyone else involved with the vaccine. All those officials and politicians who are pushing people to get vaccinated now, will immediately blame DJT.
BTW, this is anecdotal, but several months ago, our former pastor’s father had to be hospitalized after receiving the Pfizer vaccine, and is just now starting to recognize his own family members, with whom he lives. He has been confused ever since he was vaccinated.
I did find the article quoted link above through google
Citation: Classen JB. COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021; 5(1): 1-3.
You read the study? I linked it above.
IDK about you but I don’t require absolute harm to be proven to avoid something when there have been worrisome findings as are outlined in this study.
I never forget the thalidomide babies and how grateful I am that one woman at the FDA thought there was something funny about the testing and wouldn’t approve the use of the drug for pregnant women in America for several years, just long enough for thousand of limb abnormalities to be attributed to the drug use in UK & Europe. In Germany alone, 10,000 babies were born affected by Thalidomide. Many were too damaged to survive for long.
Just take a little time, not difficult to find the reference. I for one am tired of FR turning into a liberal site where there are factions that attack opposing points of view or information.
Volume 5 | Issue 1 | 1 of 3Microbiol Infect Dis, 2021 COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion DiseaseClassen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester, MD 21102, E-mail: classen@vaccines.net.J. Bart Classen, MD*Citation: Classen JB. COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease. Microbiol Infect Dis. 2021; 5(1): 1-3.
What a bunch of fearmongering nonsense. Truly ridiculous, absurd nonsense that doesn’t pass the sniff test because it fails freshman biology class.
“the Pfizer vaccine is an mRNA vaccine, an untested form of vaccine”
Wrong.
Pfizer went through full Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 clinical trials. Trial participants got their first doses of vaccine over a year ago. Both human and animal studies have been conducted. President Trump stated that the Pfizer vaccine had passed the “gold standard of safety testing”.
“produces new proteins”
It produces one protein: the S protein of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. That’s one small part of the surface of the virus. The virus itself produces those same proteins during infection. It just also produces the rest of the virus too and causes a lot of damage because it’s self-replicating. The mRNA vaccine material has a half-life of 10 hours. Within a week, it’s completely gone from your system. What remains are the antibodies that destroy SARS-CoV-2 and prevent COVID-19.
“proteins that can potentially insert into the human genome”
Wrong. That doesn’t even make any sense. Proteins aren’t part of your genome. Your genome is made up of nucleotides. Proteins are not. That’s like saying your car might grow a leg because you sat in it. That’s ridiculous nonsense. Cars don’t work that way. Cars are made of car parts. Genes are made of nucleotides. Proteins are made of amino acids. Completely different.
I just read the paper. The author has zero evidence to support any of these statements. It’s just a list of claims without any evidence. Further, the author completely ignores the fact that the sequence encoded in the mRNA for the Pfizer vaccine is nucleotide-for-nucleotide identical to the viral sequence. Ergo, if the receptor site binding were going to result in prions, we would see that more with infection than we would we the vaccine. So the vaccine is STILL reducing the risk of even this.
But what risk is there of this? No quantifiable risk because the whole thing is entirely theoretical in the author’s mind.
MIT and Harvard researchers found that mRNA from the real, original COVID virus itself was incorporated into patients’ DNA. I think it was the same article that mentioned the virus was found to have crossed the blood-brain barrier, but without the intrusion of white blood cells which usually accompanies such.
Granted the virus is not the vaccine, but the mRNA can get transcribed (presumably if there are any coinfections by viruses with reverse transcriptase).
Some of the author’s conclusions about this “study”:
- The paper cited in the “study” is about RNA binding protein, not about RNA.
- The “study” did not describe the methods used to determine whether mRNA could transform to disease causing prions. A real study would describe methods.
- The “study” speculates on interactions between the vaccine and RNA binding proteins. The binding proteins he mentions are mainly found in the nucleus, which the vaccine does not enter.
The paper you reference is about SARS 2 viral RNA, not about mRNA.
Note: No actual study is cited.
No authors, no link - just trust this website that you never heard of before, that they have seen such a study from somewhere.
These claims are garbage without a link to the original study.
Yep. And this happens more than you think - big claims and then no link to the study.
recentlyheard.com - another hack site of journalism school dropouts. Pathetic.
Re: 35 - Nope - says page not found.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.