|
Posted on 01/10/2021 11:26:49 PM PST by ransomnote
(h/t numberonepal)
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this awakening as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding 'mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3038)
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?"
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between those who strip us our constitutional rights, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger by diligently seeking the truth, independence and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Meghan McCain would be under a jail if she were to be held accountable for the crimes of her dad going back to his VN service.
::You wasted too much intellect on that one.::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
‘S’okay, she’s got lots to spare. :)
My Pops took the family to DC for sightseeing (I think) when he we lived in Hampton, Virginia for one year while Pops worked on the lunar landing module (that went to the moon).
I remember going underground in the Capitol and eating lunch at a cafeteria. I believe we rode the underground subway thingy. Or at least saw it, can't remember.
I believe that was back when DC was occupied by Americans for the most part. I thought it was pretty cool. But I was just a kid.
Mr. Adelson was a big supporter of Trump as is Steve Wynn. Don’t think he was a swamp dweller. He died of lymphoma complications.
Mr. Adelson was a big supporter of Trump as is Steve Wynn. Don’t think he was a swamp dweller. He died of lymphoma complications.
Twitter and Facebook censor and remove post they don’t agree with.
My post was respectful but then removed.
That’s called censorship.
Dorsey would be proud.
in typelouder’s post #2248
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3923831/posts?page=2248#2248
This link
https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2021/01/11/cleric-john-preston-writes/
Describes “sovereign citizen” theories, which have no basis to them.
People have attempted to use those concepts in legal filings, and have never ultimately succeeded.
This movement has been going on since at least the mid nineties, and probably earlier.
Your whole internet presence should be deleted.
From the entire earth, along with every derp now and in the future forever and ever, awomen.
Wow! That guy is good! Thanks for posting the link.
Everyone on Facebook contributes to Zuckerberg’s wealth by merely having an account in my opinion. Remember companies pay Facebook just to get their ads out to the public. If Facebook had few members to view those ads, the companies would find paying Zuckerberg to not be a good investment of advertising funds.
Just my opinion but I won’t support that b*stard. If I want to contact a friend or share a photo I will email.
::Also on YoooBoob (No pay wall)::
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thanks for that link.
https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3924724/posts?page=1
CIA releases UFO ‘Black Vault’ documents early: How to see them online
NY Post ^ | January 12, 2021 | | Hannah Sparks
Sorry greeneyes, I meant this for cherry
Everyone on Facebook contributes to Zuckerberg’s wealth by merely having an account in my opinion. Remember companies pay Facebook just to get their ads out to the public. If Facebook had few members to view those ads, the companies would find paying Zuckerberg to not be a good investment of advertising funds.
Just my opinion but I won’t support that b*stard. If I want to contact a friend or share a photo I will email.
ThankQ !
I c&p part of the article to include your 4th paragraph down, which had some info missing.
In my snipping, it’s the 6th paragraph down.
And now just a week after the heinous and deadly siege of the U.S. Capitol, the final narrative of what actually happened is still being written, revised and unmasked.
Since the weekend, major bombshell revelations already have substantially revised the initial story of a spontaneous mob overrunning an unsuspecting Capitol police force.
The FBI admitted Tuesday it received information ahead of the Jan. 6 tragedy suggesting some participants were planning a “war” on the Capitol, including killing officers and distributing maps of the complex. It alerted Washington D.C. law enforcement through the joint terrorism task force alert system. It also “disrupted” the travel plans of some of the suspected trouble-makers.
“We developed some intelligence that a number of individuals were planning to travel to the D.C. area with intentions to cause violence,” Assistant Director Steven M. D’Antuono said. “We immediately shared that information, and action was taken.”
The New York Police Department is reported to have given the Capitol Police similar intelligence warnings of impending violence.
The chief federal prosecutor in Washington declared Tuesday he is pursuing conspiracy charges, signaling the attacks on the Capitol involved multiple acts and multiple conspirators working in concert with each other. The prosecutor talked about the planting of carefully constructed IEDs as one such act. In other words, there was pre-planning for some elements of last Wednesday’s chaos.
And the official timeline of events constructed by the New York Times through videos shows protesters began breaching the perimeter of the Capitol a full 20 minutes before Trump finished his speech.
This new evidence raises the first compelling question that remains unanswered. How could Trump incite an attack that had already been pre-planned and was in motion before his speech ended?
A senior intelligence official told Just the News he has found no evidence that the president, the White House or the National Security Council was alerted in formal intelligence briefings to the pre-warnings or suspicions of violence the FBI and NYPD have admitted they had.
D’Antuono explained that one of the concerns the FBI had was trying to distinguish whether those writing “despicable things on the internet are just practicing keyboard bravado or they actually have the intent to do harm.”
Former NYPD Commissioner Bernard Kerik told Just the News on Tuesday it appeared the FBI and NYPD did their job in alerting the Capitol Police, but the evidence of a pre-planned attack would undercut the current narrative that Trump had incited a spontaneous insurrection.
“By all accounts, the FBI, NYPD and other authorities did exactly what they should have done by conducting interviews and making notifications to the Washington D.C. authorities,” Kerik said. “If these reports are true, you cannot incite a group that already pre-planned acts of violence by days or weeks, and it raises serious questions as to what security precautions were taken at the Capitol as a result.”
Getting the facts to resolve this question is essential for congressional and federal investigators, both for the legacy of Trump and for learning how to avoid a repeat of the deadly tragedy that struck last Wednesday.
The second major question that remains unanswered is: What did House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the other leaders in Congress know — and when did they know it — about the possibility for violence and the Pentagon’s pre-attack offer to send National Guardsmen to reinforce the Capitol Police?
The U.S. Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund, who resigned after the attack, told The Washington Post that security officials at the House and Senate rebuffed his early request to call in the National Guard ahead of a protest.
Sund alleged that House Sergeant-at-Arms Paul Irving was concerned with the “optics” of declaring an emergency ahead of the protests and rejected a National Guard presence. He says Senate Sergeant-at-Arms Michael Stenger recommended that he informally request the Guard to be ready in case it was needed to maintain security.
Irving and Stenger have not talked publicly. But their account will be essential to the final effort to assign accountability for the glaring security lapses exposed last Wednesday. The key questions for both men is whether they warned Pelosi or Senate Leaders Mitch McConnell and Chuck Schumer about the violence concerns or consulted with the leaders about the idea of activating the Guard.
Democrats for weeks were concerned by the pro-Trump rally and previously had criticized Trump for using National Guard to quell Black Lives Matter riots in the summer. The leadership’s discussions with their security chiefs now becomes an essential investigative focus.
Finally, there is this troubling third question: Were there facilitators inside the Capitol and outside it who instigated or enabled the attack to be carried out?
Rep. James Clyburn (D-S.C.) one of the House’s longest serving and most respected members, first raised this question a few days ago. He aptly noted that protesters were able to locate and penetrate his unlisted, unmarked office within minutes, raising the possibility they had inside help.
And video taken contemporaneously shows officers and other people opening doors to rushing rioters and some people — purported by the filming cameramen to be leftist anarchists —smashing windows and urging protesters to jump into the Capitol.
Identifying any insider help and the motives will be the final and perhaps most delicate task investigators face.
One week from today, I will be stepping aside as Secretary of State and this account will be archived. Be sure to follow me @mikepompeo. Go do it now.— Secretary Pompeo (@SecPompeo) January 13, 2021
___________________________________________________
“Go do it now”
Interesting.
Why so imperative that we do it now? Is he going to start posting interesting tidbits there today?
“rabbithole to hell”....where did you go for that”....
Rudy is on the War Room.
It was not.
Most hearty agreement on this!
Thank you for taking the time to listen and give me your input. I know it was long. Up until that broadcast Bards has been anticipating IA too. We've focused much on it on-thread. When I heard this last night I knew I did not know enough to determine to my own satisfaction and I appreciate feedback.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
