Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

More Humans Are Growing an Extra Artery in Our Arms, Showing We're Still Evolving
www.sciencealert.com ^ | 9 OCTOBER 2020 | MIKE MCRAE

Posted on 10/09/2020 11:03:16 AM PDT by Red Badger

Picturing how our species might appear in the far future often invites wild speculation over stand-out features such as height, brain size, and skin complexion. Yet subtle shifts in our anatomy today demonstrate how unpredictable evolution can be.

Take something as mundane as an extra blood vessel in our arms, which going by current trends could be common place within just a few generations.

Researchers from Flinders University and the University of Adelaide in Australia have noticed an artery that temporarily runs down the centre of our forearms while we're still in the womb isn't vanishing as often as it used to.

That means there are more adults than ever running around with what amounts to be an extra channel of vascular tissue flowing under their wrist.

"Since the 18th century, anatomists have been studying the prevalence of this artery in adults and our study shows it's clearly increasing," says Flinders University anatomist Teghan Lucas.

"The prevalence was around 10 percent in people born in the mid-1880s compared to 30 percent in those born in the late 20th century, so that's a significant increase in a fairly short period of time, when it comes to evolution."

The median artery forms fairly early in development in all humans, transporting blood down the centre of our arms to feed our growing hands.

Three major arteries in the forearm - median in the centre

At around 8 weeks, it usually regresses, leaving the task to two other vessels – the radial (which we can feel when we take a person's pulse) and the ulnar arteries.

Anatomists have known for some time that this withering away of the median artery isn't a guarantee. In some cases, it hangs around for another month or so.

Sometimes we're born with it still pumping away, feeding either just the forearm, or in some cases the hand as well.

To compare the prevalence of this persistent blood channel, Lucas and colleagues Maciej Henneberg and Jaliya Kumaratilake from the University of Adelaide examined 80 limbs from cadavers, all donated by Australians of European descent.

The donors raged from 51 to 101 on passing, which means they were nearly all born in the first half of the 20th century.

Noting down how often they found a chunky median artery capable of carrying a good supply of blood, they compared the figures with records dug out of a literature search, taking into account tallies that could over-represent the vessel's appearance.

The fact the artery seems to be three times as common in adults today as it was more than a century ago is a startling find that suggests natural selection is favouring those who hold onto this extra bit of bloody supply.

"This increase could have resulted from mutations of genes involved in median artery development or health problems in mothers during pregnancy, or both actually," says Lucas.

We might imagine having a persistent median artery could give dextrous fingers or strong forearms a dependable boost of blood long after we're born. Yet having one also puts us at a greater risk of carpal tunnel syndrome, an uncomfortable condition that makes us less able to use our hands.

Nailing down the kinds of factors that play a major role in the processes selecting for a persistent median artery will require a lot more sleuthing.

Whatever they might be, it's likely we'll continue to see more of these vessels in coming years.

"If this trend continues, a majority of people will have median artery of the forearm by 2100," says Lucas.

This rapid rise of the median artery in adults isn't unlike the reappearance of a knee bone called the fabella, which is also three times more common today than it was a century ago.

As small as these differences are, tiny microevolutionary changes add up to large-scale variations that come to define a species.

Together they create new pressures themselves, putting us on new paths of health and disease that right now we might find hard to imagine today.

This research was published in the Journal of Anatomy.


TOPICS: Education; Health/Medicine; History; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: antichristian; evolushun; evolution; evolutionisfact; fakenews; fakescience; godcommanded; godsgravesglyphs; helixmakemineadouble; lettherebextra; macroevolution; medianartery; microevolution; neandertal; neandertals; neanderthal; neanderthals; nosuchthing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last
To: Buckeye McFrog
A lot of those buildings were constructed that way to make them more efficient at using heat in cold weather. Hot air rises. The lower the ceiling height the warmer the room will stay.
41 posted on 10/09/2020 11:41:20 AM PDT by jmacusa (If we're all equal how is diversity our strength?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Interesting. One of my other random thoughts is that viruses are and have been essential in transferring genetic changes across human populations. This may already be a known thing. I’m a techie, not a geneticist dammit. :)


42 posted on 10/09/2020 11:43:29 AM PDT by StolarStorm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

I have thought that since I was a preteen and refer to it as “evolition” as opposed to “evolution”. I believe the field of epigenetics is coming around to this as well.


43 posted on 10/09/2020 11:44:50 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: GrandJediMasterYoda

What I want to know is why folks in the Old Testament lived for hundreds and hundreds of years and today seems that eighty years is the norm.


44 posted on 10/09/2020 11:46:36 AM PDT by redshawk ( I want my red balloon. ( https://youtu.be/zNLpfEDliV0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Of course this is not an example of evolution. It’s not even an example of natural selection.

It’s an interesting observation that 1) needs to be defined clearly and validated and the 2) the reason for it can be studied.

I would guess if real it has to do with nutrition, similar to our being taller than previous generations (or fatter).


45 posted on 10/09/2020 11:47:15 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ifinnegan

I’ve noticed there seems to be a lot more left handed people than there used to be......................


46 posted on 10/09/2020 11:48:42 AM PDT by Red Badger (Sine Q-Anon.....................very............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Simply more variation within species.

Certainly not creating a new one.


47 posted on 10/09/2020 11:49:53 AM PDT by metmom (...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

That is amazing, and 1870 is not long ago at all when you consider how far back humans date. Makes me wonder if the Egyptians from 5,000 years ago were a foot tall lol lol


48 posted on 10/09/2020 11:50:53 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

In a pig’s artery.

That was bad.

5.56mm


49 posted on 10/09/2020 11:52:16 AM PDT by M Kehoe (DRAIN THE SWAMP! Finish THE WALL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas resident

That’s incredible, I think if we could go back in time and see that live we would be utterly shocked how small people were. It really shows how much nutrition and disease can hinder growth


50 posted on 10/09/2020 11:52:28 AM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (As long as Hillary Clinton remains free equal justice under the law will never exist in the USA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Notice also how the headline is false, i.e. a lie.

The article does not say humans are growing a new artery. It says this artery is lost over time in childhood but now seems to be lasting longer than previously observed.

It’s similar to if baby teeth were lost at a slightly older age.


51 posted on 10/09/2020 11:53:10 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If the DNA does not account for the ‘extra’ artery, then, it’s not evolution.

If the artery is not inherited by all the generations that follow those individuals who have it, then, it’s not evolution. High intelligence is not necessarily inherited by the generations that follow those intelligent humans.

Ugliness is not necessarily inherited either, and neither is beauty.


52 posted on 10/09/2020 11:55:58 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

The extra artery is used to keep the middle finger erect.


53 posted on 10/09/2020 11:59:11 AM PDT by glorgau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: StolarStorm

“Not enough generations for natural selection to create this change.”

Yes. These articles are nonsense (not the observations about the artery per se).

And this crap is from SCIENCE publications for the lay readership, ostensibly articles which should be scientifically valid but aren’t.


54 posted on 10/09/2020 11:59:52 AM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar

“This is a genetic mutation not ‘evolution’ but labeled as such to get everyone’s dander up.”

What evidence is there this is a genetic mutation?


55 posted on 10/09/2020 12:01:16 PM PDT by ifinnegan (Democrats kill babies and harvest their organs to sell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: BBQToadRibs

Sure would. That is micro.

There is a reason Eskimos have an average 500 cholesterol count.


56 posted on 10/09/2020 12:01:30 PM PDT by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

This is not “evolution”. This is “selection”, which sometimes is “natural selection”

The artery exists, and it sometimes doesn’t go away. It used to be that it went away almost all the time, but now for an unknown reason, people are inheriting genes that keep it around.

Could be simple random chance. Could be there is something about the set of genes involved that are also giving some breeding advantage. Or it could simply be that this has been coming for a long time, but we finally got enough people with it that we hit a tipping point.

Remember, EVOLUTION is when something mutates in a way we think is “better”. Selection is when that mutation gains some advantage, so that it is propagated. Most of what people describe as evolution is simple selection.


57 posted on 10/09/2020 12:02:29 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Salvavida

Micro evolution is demonstrable. Always has been.


As long as this is understood to be gene expression of genetic information already existing.


58 posted on 10/09/2020 12:02:34 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple (Thinking Caps are no longer being issued but there must be a warehouse full of them somewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
We are not growing another artery. We are not losing one we had already.

Big difference.

It is like the enzyme we now keep to allow us to digest milk as adults. It is not new, it just does not switch off.

The body gets rid of things that are no longer being used. If they are still in use they are kept.

59 posted on 10/09/2020 12:03:27 PM PDT by Harmless Teddy Bear (And lead us not into hysteria, but deliver us from the handwashers. Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Researchers from Flinders University and the University of Adelaide in Australia have noticed an artery that temporarily runs down the centre of our forearms while we're still in the womb isn't vanishing as often as it used to.

Wouldn't this be more-properly described as an example of devolution?

If you believe in neoteny, that is.

Regards,

60 posted on 10/09/2020 12:03:31 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson