NASA Finds Sugar Molecules Essential to Life in Meteorites That Crashed to Earth

An international team of scientists at NASA have found sugar molecules on two different meteorites, the agency announced on Nov. 19.

The new discovery adds to the growing list of biologically important compounds that have been found in meteorites and supports the theory that chemical reactions in asteroids can play an important role in creating and supporting life, the space agency said in a statement.

Researchers said they discovered “ribose and other bio-essential sugars” in the extraterrestrial rock, adding that ribose is a “crucial component of RNA (ribonucleic acid)”—essential for the regulation and expression of genes.

“In much of modern life, RNA serves as a messenger molecule, copying genetic instructions from the DNA molecule (deoxyribonucleic acid) and delivering them to molecular factories within the cell called ribosomes that read the RNA to build specific proteins needed to carry out life processes,” they explained.

In a study published Monday in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, researchers analysed three separate meteorites, including one dating back billions of years that landed in Australia in 1969.

Previous attempts were made to investigate the meteors for sugar. However this time, the researchers decided to utilize a new technique using hydrochloric acid and water, and found sugars like arabinose and xylose in addition to the significant find of ribose.

“Other important building blocks of life have been found in meteorites previously, including amino acids (components of proteins) and nucleobases (components of DNA and RNA), but sugars have been a missing piece among the major building blocks of life,” the study’s lead author, Yoshihiro Furukawa, said in a statement.

The discovery of ribose also suggests that RNA evolved first and was later replaced by DNA because RNA molecules have capabilities that DNA lack, adding to the evidence that scientists are using to develop a clearer understanding of how life may have formed.

“RNA can make copies of itself without ‘help’ from other molecules, and it can also initiate or speed up chemical reactions as a catalyst. The new work gives some evidence to support the possibility that RNA coordinated the machinery of life before DNA,” the report said.

Furukawa added: “The research provides the first direct evidence of ribose in space and the delivery of the sugar to Earth. The extra-terrestrial sugar might have contributed to the formation of RNA on the prebiotic Earth which possibly led to the origin of life.”

The research team now plans to analyze more meteorites to see how abundant these sugars are and if have they a left-handed or right-handed bias, as some molecules come in two varieties which are mirror images of each other.

“On Earth, life uses left-handed amino acids and right-handed sugars. Since it’s possible that the opposite would work fine–right-handed amino acids and left-handed sugars. Scientists want to know where this preference came from,” the report explained.

In January, a report published by the American Association for the Advancement of Science said that researchers had found that two meteorites held other ingredients for life.

They included amino acids, hydrocarbons, other organic matter, and traces of liquid water which could date back to the earliest days of the solar system.

I’ve wondered that for years.

Like the difference between Levomethamphetamine and dextromethamphetamine. One is a vasoconstrictor in a nasal inhaler and the other gets you a prison sentence.

It's like Alice through the looking glass.

When I first read that on my Vicks nasal inhaler I was taken aback to say the least.

“please define ‘serious’ truth seeking spectrum”

I put “serious” in quotes because I was quoting you. It’s a simple term. I think we both know what it means. You can define it if you want.

When discussing epistemology in relation to science, we must delineate between science and a philosophy of science. The scientific method was not derived from scientific inquiry directly. Sure, in a pragmatic sense, the method evolved by doing scientific experimentation. But it was philosophy that examined the process and refined it to what is used today.

Technological progress does not always rely on the scientific method. Technology exploits how things work. Science seeks to understand how things work. Technology advances due to science but also do to random discoveries, intuition, and happy accidents. It is more pragmatic than science as inventors often simply try something until it works.

An axiomatic assumption of naturalism ignores the importance of the philosophy of science and wrongly elevates scientific inquiry to the level of reality and truth itself. When we are able to distinguish the philosophy of naturalism from science we are then able to ask the question (scientifically) of whether or not space-time is a fundamental reality. It is looking more and more like this is not the case.

It is beginning to appear that space-time functions more like an interface between our minds and the fundamental reality behind it.

Returning to Einstein’s quote, Einstein recognized philosophy to be the foundation of science and what distinguished “a mere artisan or specialist [from] a real seeker after truth”.

I do not consider those who stubbornly refuse to question their own philosophic adherence to naturalism but, rather, treat it as an article of faith, to be “serious” truth seekers.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.



· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·

Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·