|
Posted on 04/01/2019 11:32:59 AM PDT by ransomnote
Q is the result of the sacrifices and commitment of countless patriots to win back our captured country from the Deep State and achieve the transformation President Trump promised in this campaign video. President Trump has said the awakening of the public is key to this transformation.
Q describes this transformation as follows:
"The Great Awakening ('Freedom of Thought’), was designed and created not only as a backchannel to the public (away from the longstanding ‘mind’ control of the corrupt & heavily biased media) to endure future events through transparency and regeneration of individual thought (breaking the chains of ‘group-think’), but, more importantly, aid in the construction of a vehicle (a ‘ship’) that provides the scattered (‘free thinkers’) with a ‘starter’ new social-networking platform which allows for freedom of thought, expression, and patriotism or national pride (the feeling of love, devotion and sense of attachment to a homeland and alliance with other citizens who share the same sentiment).
When ‘non-dogmatic’ information becomes FREE & TRANSPARENT it becomes a threat to those who attempt to control the narrative and/or the stable.
When you are awake, you stand on the outside of the stable (‘group-think’ collective), and have ‘free thought’.
"Free thought" is a philosophical viewpoint which holds that positions regarding truth should be formed on the basis of logic, reason, and empiricism, rather than authority, tradition, revelation, or dogma.
When you are awake, you are able to clearly see.
The choice is yours, and yours alone.
Trust and put faith in yourself.
You are not alone and you are not in the minority.
Difficult truths will soon see the light of day.
WWG1WGA!!!" ~ Q (#3028)
We discuss Q drop content on our threads to learn the truth about the capture of our country, after a lifetime of reading, watching and listening to lies and distortions used to control us and tame the American spirit. The truth shall set us free.
For summaries of Q drops (i.e., posts) discussed on our threads, I invite you to read the latest editions of The Oracle, which include helpful links and quotes to explain Q drop content.
Q drops can be found here in their original format.
Links to our Q threads, and Q drops posted on our threads, are listed in this table.
The video, Qanon is 100% coming from the Trump Administration, is just one of many excellent responses to the all-important question, "Whom does Q serve?" Another excellent source for identifying Q's involvement with President Trump is found at the website titled Qproofs.com.
Q Boot Camp is a quick, condensed way to learn the background and basics about the Q movement.
Q has reminded us repeatedly that together, we are strong. As the false "narrative" is destroyed and the divisive machinery put in place by the Deep State fails, the fact that patriotism has no skin color or political party is exposed for all to see.
In the battle between Good and Evil, we can't afford to let false divisions separate us any longer. The changes heading our way and the information revealed will, at times, be very difficult to face, but we will face it together. We, and our country, will be forever made stronger for having reclaimed the truth and freedom of thought.
Where We Go 1, We Go All
Note: Links in the post above are included in a resource table in Post #1 below, along with many additional excellent links to the best Q analysts and informations sources we've identified.
Working on the coverup together. How nice!
Nice!
Now if we can just start seeing some indictments....
Soon.....
Aha, well Webb said JEFF Sessions, not me, so Webb is misleading everyone, or shall I say, “Lying”!
***********************************************************************************
That is NOT NICE. Webb often crowd sources his research, since task force -his researcher died. I suspect that someone read the article that said Mr. Sessions and thought it was Jeff and passed it on to Webb. Mistakes happen.
I have seen no proof of deliberate lying. So far, just a mistake. Maybe you should tell him about the mistake and see if he admits to the error or not.
Who’s wearing striped ties? POTUS?
If so, I don’t think he does things without a reason. I picture him almost always wearing a red tie. I think there was a reason for that, too.
>> They are rather embarrassed that the racketeering and sex trafficking cult was in their district for 20 years, that numerous people filed complaints with them, but they saw nothing, heard nothing, did nothing.
Anyone else buying the story that they’re embarrassed? That they didn’t know?
I’m not.
I’m betting that whoever was pointedly looking the other way was in on it. Either directly involved or getting paid to look away.
It seems to me that the Obama side of the crime family has been rather unlucky lately-Presidential Library troubles, Smollet blowback, and losing candidate for Mayor.
There’s a couple of us who watched his early stuff about the Awans, and his work then was very valuable. He also spelled out the incredible relationships with the Awan prosecutors and DWS, etc. He maintains that there are routes of child trafficking in plain sight. But since then, I can’t keep up with his threads of info.
*********************************************************************************************
Exactly! That’s what I’m saying too. I don’t have enough time to listen to the long Vids that only give me a snip or 2 of information that I can find out about elsewhere faster.
If he went back to the short Vids with the posterboards of info, I might watch something if it was of interest.
Red is a “power color,” and red ties connote power. It’s an old television bit of wisdom.
What has changed is the NDNY office was swimming in the Albany swamp for decades and not doing much. That changed when POTUS appointed a new US Attorney last Spring (Grant C. Jaquith).
Looks to me like the new prosecutor there intends to clean house.
>>One of the best posts ever. Thanks.
hanks, Def. That means a lot. Searching out articles seems to be my niche. I so much enjoy the strengths that others exemplify. I’m lousy at the analysis.
Is the Lockheed Skunk Works near Lancaster CA?
Burbank. Other side of the mountain.
I have no interest in communicating with Webb. If he’s such an expert and all, he would have instantly saw, as I a nobody did, that Jeff Sessions could not have had any clients for decades, if he ever did in his life, since he was a prosecuting attorney, Senator and AG for decades.
I do not see Webb as well meaning in any sense of the word. I am tired of disinfo people pretending to be MAGA. A.Jones is one of them.
Did a search about Smithfield Foods. Piece is from September of 2015:
SMITHFIELD, VIRGINIA —
When a Chinese firm bought the world’s largest pork producer, Smithfield Foods, two years ago, critics worried about U.S. employment, food safety and other issues.
After two years under Chinese ownership, the Smithfield company is doing well financially and employment is growing.
~~snip~~
https://www.voanews.com/a/china-owned-smithfield-foods-growing-little-change/2972885.html
Wait what
I pass Fox airfield all the time.
Q
Hey, if you get a chance to do a site survey hop on board. You will get to observe just how clean the facility is..... And oh that sweet smell. Not quite bacon....
No, sorry, the Chinese bought Smithfield Foods in 2013.
See 1128 and 1355.
SNIPPET OF INTERVIEW WITH CHICAGO MAYOR LIGHTFOOT:
Q: Who has called you since you won? Obama called. What’s that been like?
A: I spoke with President (Donald) Trump. Very cordial conversation. Spoke with (former) President (Barack) Obama. Spoke with Ivanka Trump, which was interesting and a surprise. Spoke with a number of different Democratic presidential contenders, who have reached out. A number of mayors from across the country have reached out. And then, you know, lots of friends and family members from near and far.
Q: Were you surprised that Trump called?
A: Yes and no, right? It’s a smart, politic thing to do. Yeah, of course I was a little surprised. You know, when you get the White House operator and they say, “Just a moment for the president of the United States,” that’s a pretty heady moment.
Q: How did the call go?
A: I think it went well. I’ve never spoken to the man before. He’s never spoken to me. He was very complimentary about the race, and extended an offer to be helpful to the city.
I intend to take him up on that offer. While our politics are radically different, he’s still the president of the United States. We have a lot of taxpayers in this city who deserve to get every nickel of their tax dollars that they’re entitled to from Washington, and I intend to make that happen.
Q: Did the president bring up the crime issue that he so frequently tweets about?
A: Yeah, but in a much more indirect way. Yes, we did talk briefly about it. It was not a short conversation, but not a long conversation.
Chicago Mayor-elect Lori Lightfoot speaks on April 3, 2019, about how the Ald. Edward Burke scandal helped propel her to victory in the mayoral election. (Zbigniew Bzdak / Chicago Tribune)
Q: You mentioned the unlikely nature of your campaign, just from the poll numbers in January to now. If you think back even further to when you started on the Police Board, that was pre-Laquan McDonald and before policing became the mega-issue that it is now. Has the thought crossed your mind that without the McDonald shooting and without the raids and charge against Ald. Ed Burke, that you wouldn’t be sitting here in this position?
A: Well, let me take that in chunks. I think that the fact of Laquan McDonald’s murder and all of the process around the suppression of the videotape caused a lot of things to happen in our city.
It sent tremors in a lot of ways. It certainly galvanized the feeling that had been expressed in black and brown communities, particularly black communities, for a long time, that the police were not fair to them.
And that’s probably a supreme understatement. It opened up a lot of shock waves, and certainly it galvanized a lot of activism, of all generations, particularly around young people. It gave them kind of a rallying cause for sure, which I think on balance has been a good thing for our city.
Obviously, there are people in that community who view me as suspect, that’s probably the most generous characterization. But some of the conversations we’re having today, certainly around that issue, but also just around governance and accountability between the government and the people, we wouldn’t be having without that moment happening.
So, yeah, that certainly has made me think about public service and governance in a very different way. I can say unequivocally thinking about being a candidate for mayor back then was probably the furthest thing from my mind. It wasn’t even in my mind. That came much, much later.
But we’ve been in this moment in our city. We didn’t know it in October of ’14 when Laquan McDonald was murdered, but really if you kind of trace the arc of this, it probably could trace back until at least then.
Now, a lot of these issues that are blowing have been cross currents that have been in Chicago for maybe the entirety of its history, but certainly modern history. So that’s kind of one phase of it.
What happened with the search warrants with Burke’s office, I can actually remember very clearly you called on a Friday afternoon, and said, “Nobody else is talking to me.” I was surprised by that, because it was such a seminal moment. That conversation that we had that Friday afternoon probably propelled things, because I certainly realized they’re running for cover.
This is an important thing that we need to talk about, make sure we capitalize on for sure. But what it did, and obviously the final chapter in this is far from being written, but you think about that happens on a Thursday and the next Tuesday or Wednesday he holds his annual fundraiser and 2,000 people show up. They probably broke records. That really kind of puts in context where we were.
I think that and the reaction, particularly around all the running for cover. I said they were scattering like cockroaches with a light shined on them, and I think there was some truth to that. Now, I wasn’t calling a person a cockroach, but it was that action of running for cover to stay away from this story and hope that it didn’t consume them, but it did.
I’ve talked with people who are like Fortune 25 CEOs in that world, and I’ve talked to just the little, tiny small business person and local residents, this issue of corruption is something that touches everybody. Everybody. And people are sick of it.
They want a life in this city that they don’t have to do something because they are afraid that not to take some action, not to write a check, not to kiss the ring in some way, is going to cause them harm.
We still have that city, and I want to fundamentally change that. So, yes, I became the vessel into which people poured their hopes that we can have a different kind of city. I recognize that, but in politics, sometimes it’s good to be lucky.
Q: You ran on getting rid of aldermanic privilege (the practice of aldermen having veto power over all permitting and zoning decisions in their wards). That’s probably easier to talk about than the mechanics of actually withdrawing that practice. It’s not like it’s a line in the city code. It’s deeper than that. How do you go about addressing that?
A: I’m going to consult with some of the alderman who have been supportive of the campaign. I’m very clear on it. Some of them have a very different view, but I’m very clear that it’s got to go. I want to do it in a way that doesn’t do further harm, the quintessential throwing the baby out with the bathwater. But it’s got to go. How do you do it?
My thoughts are that because it’s not written into law and it’s just a very dominant culture … I’m thinking about an executive order from day one that says in more legalese than this, “This is not a thing. We will no longer honor this.”
Because the way that aldermanic prerogative works is there’s got to be compliance with the executive branch, because otherwise it doesn’t work.
So, you’ve got to eliminate that compliance, and you make it a mandate. And then you do training, particularly in the city licensing departments whether it’s zoning, buildings, housing, planning, and you pick the people who run those agencies and the deputies that are pledging allegiance to the new world order and good governance. And then I think you have the inspector general do some spot audits to make sure that there is real compliance.
You obviously have to engage in a dialogue with the City Council. It’s not that alderman no longer are able to have notice and an opportunity to be heard. If aldermen are doing their job right, they should be the people who are closest to the vibe and the beat in their neighborhood and have a very important role to play on a number of different issues, but not a unilateral, unchecked right.
That’s gone as soon as I take office, because it prevents us from engaging in citywide initiatives, it prevents us from moving ahead on important issues like affordable housing and it is fundamentally corrosive and there is no ay to monitor it in a way you can bring transparency and accountability to it. ...snip...
copyright © 2019, Chicago Tribune
Edward Burke Lori Lightfoot Ivanka Trump Lincoln Yards Ty
Fahner
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
